骨盆底疾病的多学科团队方法:系统回顾。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Tzong-Yun Tsai, Shu-Huan Huang, Chun-Kai Liao, Kun-Yu Tsai, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Sum-Fu Chiang, Osamu Hiraike
{"title":"骨盆底疾病的多学科团队方法:系统回顾。","authors":"Tzong-Yun Tsai, Shu-Huan Huang, Chun-Kai Liao, Kun-Yu Tsai, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Sum-Fu Chiang, Osamu Hiraike","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) severely and negatively impact on quality of life, affecting physical, psychological, and social well-being. Historically, PFDs have been managed within single-specialty frameworks, yet the complexity of these conditions often necessitates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of MDT strategies in improving outcomes for individuals with PFDs, aiming to identify the benefits and potential advantages of integrated, multi-specialty care for these complex conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted through September 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies of adult patients with PFDs in which MDT protocols were integrated for diagnosis, treatment, or rehabilitation. Eligible studies included comparisons between MDT and non-MDT care, as well as studies without a comparison group. Outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcomes, therapy adherence, complication rates, and recurrence rates. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for eligibility, with discrepancies resolved through discussion to reach a consensus. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 24 studies conducted across various countries were included, comprising 21 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), with sample sizes ranging from 36 to 3,600 patients. The findings generally indicate favorable outcomes with an MDT approach, including enhanced surgical results, greater symptom relief, reduced recurrence and complication rates following surgical interventions, improved treatment adherence, and high patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An MDT approach offers benefits for PFD management, improving patient-reported outcomes, treatment adherence, and quality of life. This review supports the broader adoption of MDT approaches for comprehensive PFD management. Further research is warranted to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize MDT protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"100912"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Tzong-Yun Tsai, Shu-Huan Huang, Chun-Kai Liao, Kun-Yu Tsai, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Sum-Fu Chiang, Osamu Hiraike\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bj.2025.100912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) severely and negatively impact on quality of life, affecting physical, psychological, and social well-being. Historically, PFDs have been managed within single-specialty frameworks, yet the complexity of these conditions often necessitates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of MDT strategies in improving outcomes for individuals with PFDs, aiming to identify the benefits and potential advantages of integrated, multi-specialty care for these complex conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted through September 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies of adult patients with PFDs in which MDT protocols were integrated for diagnosis, treatment, or rehabilitation. Eligible studies included comparisons between MDT and non-MDT care, as well as studies without a comparison group. Outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcomes, therapy adherence, complication rates, and recurrence rates. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for eligibility, with discrepancies resolved through discussion to reach a consensus. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 24 studies conducted across various countries were included, comprising 21 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), with sample sizes ranging from 36 to 3,600 patients. The findings generally indicate favorable outcomes with an MDT approach, including enhanced surgical results, greater symptom relief, reduced recurrence and complication rates following surgical interventions, improved treatment adherence, and high patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An MDT approach offers benefits for PFD management, improving patient-reported outcomes, treatment adherence, and quality of life. This review supports the broader adoption of MDT approaches for comprehensive PFD management. Further research is warranted to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize MDT protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2025.100912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:盆底疾病(PFDs)严重影响生活质量,影响身体、心理和社会福祉。从历史上看,pfd一直在单一专业框架内进行管理,但这些条件的复杂性通常需要一个全面的多学科团队(MDT)方法。本系统综述评估了MDT策略在改善pfd患者预后方面的有效性,旨在确定对这些复杂疾病进行综合多专业护理的益处和潜在优势。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,在2024年9月25日之前对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL进行系统检索。纳入标准是对成年PFDs患者的研究,其中MDT方案被纳入诊断、治疗或康复。符合条件的研究包括MDT和非MDT治疗之间的比较,以及没有对照组的研究。研究的结果包括患者报告的结果、治疗依从性、并发症发生率和复发率。三位独立审稿人对标题和摘要进行筛选,并通过讨论解决差异以达成共识。数据提取由两名审稿人独立完成,任何差异由第三名审稿人裁定。结果:共纳入来自不同国家的24项研究,包括21项回顾性队列研究、2项前瞻性队列研究和1项随机对照试验(RCT),样本量从36例到3600例不等。研究结果普遍表明MDT方法的良好结果,包括增强手术效果,更大的症状缓解,减少手术干预后的复发率和并发症发生率,改善治疗依从性和高患者满意度。结论:MDT方法为PFD管理提供了益处,改善了患者报告的结果、治疗依从性和生活质量。本综述支持更广泛地采用MDT方法进行PFD的综合管理。有必要进一步研究以确认长期有效性并使MDT方案标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Background: Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) severely and negatively impact on quality of life, affecting physical, psychological, and social well-being. Historically, PFDs have been managed within single-specialty frameworks, yet the complexity of these conditions often necessitates a comprehensive, multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of MDT strategies in improving outcomes for individuals with PFDs, aiming to identify the benefits and potential advantages of integrated, multi-specialty care for these complex conditions.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted through September 25, 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies of adult patients with PFDs in which MDT protocols were integrated for diagnosis, treatment, or rehabilitation. Eligible studies included comparisons between MDT and non-MDT care, as well as studies without a comparison group. Outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcomes, therapy adherence, complication rates, and recurrence rates. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts for eligibility, with discrepancies resolved through discussion to reach a consensus. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer.

Results: In total, 24 studies conducted across various countries were included, comprising 21 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), with sample sizes ranging from 36 to 3,600 patients. The findings generally indicate favorable outcomes with an MDT approach, including enhanced surgical results, greater symptom relief, reduced recurrence and complication rates following surgical interventions, improved treatment adherence, and high patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: An MDT approach offers benefits for PFD management, improving patient-reported outcomes, treatment adherence, and quality of life. This review supports the broader adoption of MDT approaches for comprehensive PFD management. Further research is warranted to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize MDT protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信