Jie Gao, Jun Chen, Xing Huang, Yiping Zheng, Yao Wei, Yufeng Shen
{"title":"621例胆总管取石术后胆漏及切口感染的影响因素分析","authors":"Jie Gao, Jun Chen, Xing Huang, Yiping Zheng, Yao Wei, Yufeng Shen","doi":"10.1159/000548103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify independent risk factors for bile leakage and incisional infection after choledocholithotomy and to explore the potential association between bile leakage and incisional infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 621 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy between January 2017 and October 2024. Clinical data were collected, and univariate analysis followed by binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative bile leakage and incisional infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bile leakage occurred in 60 patients (9.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that open surgery (OR = 1.672), acute biliary inflammation (OR = 2.469), advanced age (OR = 1.061), continuous suturing (OR = 4.991), prolonged operative time (OR = 1.005), and bile pathogen infection (OR = 2.37) were independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). Among 181 patients who underwent open or converted surgery, 40 (22.1%) developed incisional infections. Independent risk factors for incisional infection included advanced age (OR = 1.055), prolonged operation time (OR = 1.006), elevated postoperative WBC count within 24 hours (OR = 1.149), emergency surgery (OR = 3.745), longer incision length (OR = 1.141), and postoperative bile leakage (OR = 14.027) (all P < 0.05), indicating a strong association between bile leakage and subsequent wound infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open surgery, acute inflammation, older age, continuous suturing, and intra-biliary infection significantly increase the risk of postoperative bile leakage. Moreover, bile leakage was identified as a strong independent predictor of incisional infection. In addition, prolonged operative time, elevated early postoperative leukocyte count, emergency surgery, and longer incisions were also associated with increased infection risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Bile Leakage and Incisional Infection Post Choledocholithotomy: An Analysis Based on 621 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Gao, Jun Chen, Xing Huang, Yiping Zheng, Yao Wei, Yufeng Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify independent risk factors for bile leakage and incisional infection after choledocholithotomy and to explore the potential association between bile leakage and incisional infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 621 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy between January 2017 and October 2024. Clinical data were collected, and univariate analysis followed by binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative bile leakage and incisional infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bile leakage occurred in 60 patients (9.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that open surgery (OR = 1.672), acute biliary inflammation (OR = 2.469), advanced age (OR = 1.061), continuous suturing (OR = 4.991), prolonged operative time (OR = 1.005), and bile pathogen infection (OR = 2.37) were independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). Among 181 patients who underwent open or converted surgery, 40 (22.1%) developed incisional infections. Independent risk factors for incisional infection included advanced age (OR = 1.055), prolonged operation time (OR = 1.006), elevated postoperative WBC count within 24 hours (OR = 1.149), emergency surgery (OR = 3.745), longer incision length (OR = 1.141), and postoperative bile leakage (OR = 14.027) (all P < 0.05), indicating a strong association between bile leakage and subsequent wound infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open surgery, acute inflammation, older age, continuous suturing, and intra-biliary infection significantly increase the risk of postoperative bile leakage. Moreover, bile leakage was identified as a strong independent predictor of incisional infection. In addition, prolonged operative time, elevated early postoperative leukocyte count, emergency surgery, and longer incisions were also associated with increased infection risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors Influencing Bile Leakage and Incisional Infection Post Choledocholithotomy: An Analysis Based on 621 Patients.
Purpose: To identify independent risk factors for bile leakage and incisional infection after choledocholithotomy and to explore the potential association between bile leakage and incisional infection.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 621 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy between January 2017 and October 2024. Clinical data were collected, and univariate analysis followed by binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative bile leakage and incisional infection.
Results: Bile leakage occurred in 60 patients (9.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that open surgery (OR = 1.672), acute biliary inflammation (OR = 2.469), advanced age (OR = 1.061), continuous suturing (OR = 4.991), prolonged operative time (OR = 1.005), and bile pathogen infection (OR = 2.37) were independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). Among 181 patients who underwent open or converted surgery, 40 (22.1%) developed incisional infections. Independent risk factors for incisional infection included advanced age (OR = 1.055), prolonged operation time (OR = 1.006), elevated postoperative WBC count within 24 hours (OR = 1.149), emergency surgery (OR = 3.745), longer incision length (OR = 1.141), and postoperative bile leakage (OR = 14.027) (all P < 0.05), indicating a strong association between bile leakage and subsequent wound infection.
Conclusion: Open surgery, acute inflammation, older age, continuous suturing, and intra-biliary infection significantly increase the risk of postoperative bile leakage. Moreover, bile leakage was identified as a strong independent predictor of incisional infection. In addition, prolonged operative time, elevated early postoperative leukocyte count, emergency surgery, and longer incisions were also associated with increased infection risk.
期刊介绍:
''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.