重新制定咨询和心理治疗基础的哲学错误和意外伤害：对苏等人的评论（2024）。

IF 12.3 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

American Psychologist Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1037/amp0001469

Dean McKay,Elysa Koppelman-White

{"title":"重新制定咨询和心理治疗基础的哲学错误和意外伤害：对苏等人的评论（2024）。","authors":"Dean McKay,Elysa Koppelman-White","doi":"10.1037/amp0001469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this commentary, we address some of the faulty assumptions regarding Enlightenment philosophy that Sue et al. (see record 2025-04512-010) claim are at the root of systemic racism in counseling and psychotherapy (C&P). They argued that Enlightenment concepts-universalism, individualism, objectivism, and empiricism-be replaced by relativism, collectivism, subjectivism, and experientialism. We describe the potential harms that could result from the abandonment of Enlightenment ideals, including worsening prejudicial actions. We conclude that racism in C&P is more likely accounted for by individual therapist actions rather than a result of the philosophical foundations of C&P. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":"19 1","pages":"964-965"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philosophical errors and unintended harms in recrafting the foundation of counseling and psychotherapy: Commentary on Sue et al. (2024).\",\"authors\":\"Dean McKay,Elysa Koppelman-White\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this commentary, we address some of the faulty assumptions regarding Enlightenment philosophy that Sue et al. (see record 2025-04512-010) claim are at the root of systemic racism in counseling and psychotherapy (C&P). They argued that Enlightenment concepts-universalism, individualism, objectivism, and empiricism-be replaced by relativism, collectivism, subjectivism, and experientialism. We describe the potential harms that could result from the abandonment of Enlightenment ideals, including worsening prejudicial actions. We conclude that racism in C&P is more likely accounted for by individual therapist actions rather than a result of the philosophical foundations of C&P. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Psychologist\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"964-965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001469\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论中，我们讨论了一些关于启蒙哲学的错误假设，Sue等人（见record 2025-04512-010）声称这些假设是咨询和心理治疗（C&P）中系统性种族主义的根源。他们认为启蒙运动的概念——普遍主义、个人主义、客观主义和经验主义——应该被相对主义、集体主义、主观主义和经验主义所取代。我们描述了放弃启蒙理想可能导致的潜在危害，包括恶化的偏见行为。我们的结论是，C&P中的种族主义更可能是由个体治疗师的行为造成的，而不是C&P的哲学基础造成的。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Philosophical errors and unintended harms in recrafting the foundation of counseling and psychotherapy: Commentary on Sue et al. (2024).

In this commentary, we address some of the faulty assumptions regarding Enlightenment philosophy that Sue et al. (see record 2025-04512-010) claim are at the root of systemic racism in counseling and psychotherapy (C&P). They argued that Enlightenment concepts-universalism, individualism, objectivism, and empiricism-be replaced by relativism, collectivism, subjectivism, and experientialism. We describe the potential harms that could result from the abandonment of Enlightenment ideals, including worsening prejudicial actions. We conclude that racism in C&P is more likely accounted for by individual therapist actions rather than a result of the philosophical foundations of C&P. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

18.50

自引率

1.20%

发文量

145

期刊介绍： Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.