From oversight to insight: integrating epicotyl emergence to redefine germination and enhance the seed dormancy framework

The seed science community currently defines germination as radicle emergence of 2 mm from the dispersal unit. Consequently, most seed researchers abruptly terminate germination experiments after radicle emergence, concluding that the seed has germinated. However, this approach underestimates epicotyl dormancy and often leads to dormancy misclassification, or worse, a failure to identify epicotyl dormancy altogether. To address these limitations, we propose extending germination studies to the point of first leaf emergence; we term this the “full germination” period. Our methodology involves germinating fully matured, freshly collected seeds and depending on the time required for radicle emergence, the seeds are categorized into (1) viviparous, where seeds germinate prematurely while they are still attached to the parent plant or within the fruit; (2) Morphological dormancy (MD) or Non-dormant (ND), where seeds germinate within 30 days; and (3) physiological dormancy (PD) and morphophysiological dormancy (MPD), where germination does not occur within 30 days. The absence of shoot emergence within 30 days following radicle protrusion indicates the presence of epicotyl dormancy. Thus, species initially classified as ND, MD, or viviparous may be miscategorized if shoot emergence is not assessed. Likewise, seeds exhibiting PD or MPD may possess an additional epicotyl dormancy component, possibly leading to placing them in incorrect subclass or level. A comprehensive assessment of shoot development is imperative for accurate dormancy characterization. We strongly recommend monitoring seed germination until first true leaf emergence should be adopted to ensure correct conclusions about dormancy, plant life cycles and ecological adaptations.