宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌癌症筛查连续体的护理差距。

Jennifer S Haas,Kaitlin W Todd,Dale Mclerran,Jasmin A Tiro,Anil Vachani,Sarah Kobrin,Chelsea Saia,Celette Sugg Skinner,Yingye Zheng,Jessica Chubak,Douglas A Corley,Robert T Greenlee,Ethan A Halm,Christopher I Li
{"title":"宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌癌症筛查连续体的护理差距。","authors":"Jennifer S Haas,Kaitlin W Todd,Dale Mclerran,Jasmin A Tiro,Anil Vachani,Sarah Kobrin,Chelsea Saia,Celette Sugg Skinner,Yingye Zheng,Jessica Chubak,Douglas A Corley,Robert T Greenlee,Ethan A Halm,Christopher I Li","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWhile screening for cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers reduce cancer-specific mortality, the full benefits of screening are only realized when coupled with timely care across the subsequent \"screening continuum\" steps, including surveillance (results warranting frequent monitoring), diagnostic evaluation (results that require additional testing), and treatment (detected cancers). Our goal was to describe the proportion of individuals receiving timely cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer care at each step in the screening continuum.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective cohort study used data from the 10 health care settings that participate in the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR II) consortium and included individuals who were eligible for a step along the cancer screening continuum in 2018. Proportions of individuals who received timely testing were calculated for screening, surveillance, and diagnostic tests for each of the three cancers and treatment (colorectal only), and the association of these outcomes with patient characteristics was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe overall proportions of timely screening, surveillance, and diagnostic testing were 41.8%, 37.3%, and 61.2%, for cervical cancer; 82.4%, 45.5%, and 73.5% for colorectal (94.1% for timely treatment); and 73.8%, 80.5%, and 80.7% for lung cancer. Across all three cancers, there were differences across the screening continuum by insurance status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThere are important gaps in care across the screening continuum beyond common metrics for screening uptake. Comparison across organ types may facilitate the identification of interventions and policies that could broadly improve cancer prevention and promote health equity.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps in care across the cancer screening continuum for cervical, colorectal and lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer S Haas,Kaitlin W Todd,Dale Mclerran,Jasmin A Tiro,Anil Vachani,Sarah Kobrin,Chelsea Saia,Celette Sugg Skinner,Yingye Zheng,Jessica Chubak,Douglas A Corley,Robert T Greenlee,Ethan A Halm,Christopher I Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nWhile screening for cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers reduce cancer-specific mortality, the full benefits of screening are only realized when coupled with timely care across the subsequent \\\"screening continuum\\\" steps, including surveillance (results warranting frequent monitoring), diagnostic evaluation (results that require additional testing), and treatment (detected cancers). Our goal was to describe the proportion of individuals receiving timely cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer care at each step in the screening continuum.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis retrospective cohort study used data from the 10 health care settings that participate in the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR II) consortium and included individuals who were eligible for a step along the cancer screening continuum in 2018. Proportions of individuals who received timely testing were calculated for screening, surveillance, and diagnostic tests for each of the three cancers and treatment (colorectal only), and the association of these outcomes with patient characteristics was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe overall proportions of timely screening, surveillance, and diagnostic testing were 41.8%, 37.3%, and 61.2%, for cervical cancer; 82.4%, 45.5%, and 73.5% for colorectal (94.1% for timely treatment); and 73.8%, 80.5%, and 80.7% for lung cancer. Across all three cancers, there were differences across the screening continuum by insurance status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThere are important gaps in care across the screening continuum beyond common metrics for screening uptake. Comparison across organ types may facilitate the identification of interventions and policies that could broadly improve cancer prevention and promote health equity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌的筛查降低了癌症特异性死亡率,但筛查的全部益处只有在随后的“筛查连续体”步骤中及时护理时才能实现,包括监测(需要经常监测的结果)、诊断评估(需要额外检测的结果)和治疗(检测到的癌症)。我们的目标是描述在筛查连续体的每个步骤中及时接受宫颈癌、结直肠癌和肺癌治疗的个体比例。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用了参与基于人群的优化筛查过程研究(PROSPR II)联盟的10个医疗机构的数据,并纳入了2018年有资格进行癌症筛查连续体一步的个体。计算及时接受三种癌症筛查、监测和诊断测试的个体比例以及治疗(仅结直肠癌),并使用多变量logistic回归评估这些结果与患者特征的关联。结果宫颈癌及时筛查、监测和诊断检测的总体比例分别为41.8%、37.3%和61.2%;结直肠82.4%、45.5%、73.5%(及时治疗94.1%);肺癌的发病率分别为73.8%,80.5%和80.7%。在所有三种癌症中,在保险状况、种族/民族和社会经济地位的筛查连续体中存在差异。结论:在筛查连续体的护理中,除了常见的筛查吸收指标外,还存在重要的差距。跨器官类型的比较可能有助于确定可以广泛改善癌症预防和促进健康公平的干预措施和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaps in care across the cancer screening continuum for cervical, colorectal and lung cancer.
BACKGROUND While screening for cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers reduce cancer-specific mortality, the full benefits of screening are only realized when coupled with timely care across the subsequent "screening continuum" steps, including surveillance (results warranting frequent monitoring), diagnostic evaluation (results that require additional testing), and treatment (detected cancers). Our goal was to describe the proportion of individuals receiving timely cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer care at each step in the screening continuum. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data from the 10 health care settings that participate in the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR II) consortium and included individuals who were eligible for a step along the cancer screening continuum in 2018. Proportions of individuals who received timely testing were calculated for screening, surveillance, and diagnostic tests for each of the three cancers and treatment (colorectal only), and the association of these outcomes with patient characteristics was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS The overall proportions of timely screening, surveillance, and diagnostic testing were 41.8%, 37.3%, and 61.2%, for cervical cancer; 82.4%, 45.5%, and 73.5% for colorectal (94.1% for timely treatment); and 73.8%, 80.5%, and 80.7% for lung cancer. Across all three cancers, there were differences across the screening continuum by insurance status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS There are important gaps in care across the screening continuum beyond common metrics for screening uptake. Comparison across organ types may facilitate the identification of interventions and policies that could broadly improve cancer prevention and promote health equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信