各种预成型鼻气管管长度和形状的比较。

Naotaro Nakamura, Natsuki Kobayashi, Ryohei Okazawa, Manabu Miki, Takeshi Ohno, Mutsumi Nonaka, Kentaro Ouchi
{"title":"各种预成型鼻气管管长度和形状的比较。","authors":"Naotaro Nakamura, Natsuki Kobayashi, Ryohei Okazawa, Manabu Miki, Takeshi Ohno, Mutsumi Nonaka, Kentaro Ouchi","doi":"10.2344/24-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the differences in the lengths and shapes of several preformed nasotracheal tubes (NTTs) among different manufacturers and compare our findings with a previous report.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using reference points at the tube tip, the proximal edge of the cuff, and the flexion point, we measured tube lengths for NTTs with inner diameters of 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5 mm from 4 manufacturers: the Parker Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube (Parker), the Medtronic Taper Guard RAE (RAE), the Rusch AGT Nasal Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube, and the Portex Polar Preformed Tracheal Tube. Cuff lengths and shapes were also assessed. A historical comparison was then performed using a previous report from 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective lengths (distance between tube tip and flexion point) were largest for the Parker tubes (295-315 mm). The RAE and Rusch tubes had the shortest effective lengths (270-290 mm). Cuff lengths ranged from 30 to 39 mm, and cuff shapes were cylindrical, tapered, and oval. Comparison with the past data revealed substantial changes in tube lengths for Parker and RAE tubes, modest increases in cuff lengths, and a change in cuff shape from oval to tapered in RAE tubes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several changes in tube lengths and cuff lengths/shapes were noted among manufacturers relative to the historical data. These findings demonstrate that manufacturer specifications can change over time. In dentistry and oral surgery, Parker tubes may be more ideal due to their longer effective lengths because extension and/or rotation of the neck can decrease NTT insertion depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"72 3","pages":"180-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Length and Shape of Various Preformed Nasotracheal Tubes.\",\"authors\":\"Naotaro Nakamura, Natsuki Kobayashi, Ryohei Okazawa, Manabu Miki, Takeshi Ohno, Mutsumi Nonaka, Kentaro Ouchi\",\"doi\":\"10.2344/24-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the differences in the lengths and shapes of several preformed nasotracheal tubes (NTTs) among different manufacturers and compare our findings with a previous report.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using reference points at the tube tip, the proximal edge of the cuff, and the flexion point, we measured tube lengths for NTTs with inner diameters of 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5 mm from 4 manufacturers: the Parker Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube (Parker), the Medtronic Taper Guard RAE (RAE), the Rusch AGT Nasal Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube, and the Portex Polar Preformed Tracheal Tube. Cuff lengths and shapes were also assessed. A historical comparison was then performed using a previous report from 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective lengths (distance between tube tip and flexion point) were largest for the Parker tubes (295-315 mm). The RAE and Rusch tubes had the shortest effective lengths (270-290 mm). Cuff lengths ranged from 30 to 39 mm, and cuff shapes were cylindrical, tapered, and oval. Comparison with the past data revealed substantial changes in tube lengths for Parker and RAE tubes, modest increases in cuff lengths, and a change in cuff shape from oval to tapered in RAE tubes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several changes in tube lengths and cuff lengths/shapes were noted among manufacturers relative to the historical data. These findings demonstrate that manufacturer specifications can change over time. In dentistry and oral surgery, Parker tubes may be more ideal due to their longer effective lengths because extension and/or rotation of the neck can decrease NTT insertion depth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"180-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目的是研究不同制造商的几种预成型鼻气管管(ntt)的长度和形状的差异,并将我们的发现与先前的报道进行比较。方法:使用导管尖端、袖带近端边缘和弯曲点的参考点,我们测量了内径为6.5、7.0和7.5 mm的ntt的管长,这些ntt来自4家制造商:Parker预成形袖带气管内管(Parker)、Medtronic锥形防护RAE (RAE)、Rusch AGT鼻预成形袖带气管内管和Portex Polar预成形气管管。袖口长度和形状也被评估。然后使用2012年的上一份报告进行历史比较。结果:帕克管的有效长度(管尖与挠曲点之间的距离)最大,为295 ~ 315 mm。RAE管和Rusch管的有效长度最短(270 ~ 290 mm)。袖口长度从30到39毫米不等,袖口形状为圆柱形、锥形和椭圆形。与过去的数据比较显示,Parker管和RAE管的管长发生了实质性的变化,袖口长度适度增加,RAE管的袖口形状从椭圆形变为锥形。结论:与历史数据相比,制造商在管长和袖口长度/形状方面存在一些变化。这些发现表明,制造商的规格可以随着时间的推移而改变。在牙科和口腔外科中,帕克管可能更理想,因为它的有效长度更长,因为颈部的伸展和/或旋转可以减少NTT的插入深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Length and Shape of Various Preformed Nasotracheal Tubes.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the differences in the lengths and shapes of several preformed nasotracheal tubes (NTTs) among different manufacturers and compare our findings with a previous report.

Methods: Using reference points at the tube tip, the proximal edge of the cuff, and the flexion point, we measured tube lengths for NTTs with inner diameters of 6.5, 7.0, and 7.5 mm from 4 manufacturers: the Parker Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube (Parker), the Medtronic Taper Guard RAE (RAE), the Rusch AGT Nasal Preformed Cuffed Endotracheal Tube, and the Portex Polar Preformed Tracheal Tube. Cuff lengths and shapes were also assessed. A historical comparison was then performed using a previous report from 2012.

Results: The effective lengths (distance between tube tip and flexion point) were largest for the Parker tubes (295-315 mm). The RAE and Rusch tubes had the shortest effective lengths (270-290 mm). Cuff lengths ranged from 30 to 39 mm, and cuff shapes were cylindrical, tapered, and oval. Comparison with the past data revealed substantial changes in tube lengths for Parker and RAE tubes, modest increases in cuff lengths, and a change in cuff shape from oval to tapered in RAE tubes.

Conclusion: Several changes in tube lengths and cuff lengths/shapes were noted among manufacturers relative to the historical data. These findings demonstrate that manufacturer specifications can change over time. In dentistry and oral surgery, Parker tubes may be more ideal due to their longer effective lengths because extension and/or rotation of the neck can decrease NTT insertion depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信