虚拟现实分心与一氧化二氮减少焦虑和注射疼痛。

Kinnison Edmunds, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, John Nusstein, Al Reader
{"title":"虚拟现实分心与一氧化二氮减少焦虑和注射疼痛。","authors":"Kinnison Edmunds, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, John Nusstein, Al Reader","doi":"10.2344/24-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare nitrous oxide (N2O) vs virtual reality (VR) as methods for reducing pain and anxiety during a dental injection. The primary objectives were to assess acute changes in stress responses by comparing salivary cortisol levels between the 2 groups and differences in injection pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 132 female subjects serving as their own control received maxillary lateral incisor infiltration injections with the use of either N2O or a VR headset during separate appointments spaced at least 2 weeks apart. Salivary cortisol samples were collected at 6 times throughout each appointment. Pain scores for needle insertion and solution deposition were recorded. Data were analyzed statistically using Wald and paired t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N2O significantly lowered salivary cortisol concentrations and subsequent physiologic anxiety as compared with VR (P = .0089). However, no significant differences in needle insertion or solution deposition pain scores were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although VR and N2O may be comparable in terms of perceived pain reduction, N2O was a more effective method than VR for physiologic analgesia and anxiolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"72 3","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual Reality Distraction vs Nitrous Oxide for Reducing Anxiety and Injection Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Kinnison Edmunds, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, John Nusstein, Al Reader\",\"doi\":\"10.2344/24-0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare nitrous oxide (N2O) vs virtual reality (VR) as methods for reducing pain and anxiety during a dental injection. The primary objectives were to assess acute changes in stress responses by comparing salivary cortisol levels between the 2 groups and differences in injection pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 132 female subjects serving as their own control received maxillary lateral incisor infiltration injections with the use of either N2O or a VR headset during separate appointments spaced at least 2 weeks apart. Salivary cortisol samples were collected at 6 times throughout each appointment. Pain scores for needle insertion and solution deposition were recorded. Data were analyzed statistically using Wald and paired t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N2O significantly lowered salivary cortisol concentrations and subsequent physiologic anxiety as compared with VR (P = .0089). However, no significant differences in needle insertion or solution deposition pain scores were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although VR and N2O may be comparable in terms of perceived pain reduction, N2O was a more effective method than VR for physiologic analgesia and anxiolysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"143-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较一氧化二氮(N2O)和虚拟现实(VR)作为减少牙科注射期间疼痛和焦虑的方法。主要目的是通过比较两组患者唾液皮质醇水平和注射疼痛评分的差异来评估应激反应的急性变化。方法:132名女性受试者作为对照,在至少间隔2周的两次预约中分别使用N2O或VR耳机进行上颌侧切牙浸润注射。唾液皮质醇样本在每次预约中收集6次。记录针插入和溶液沉积的疼痛评分。数据采用Wald和配对t检验进行统计学分析。结果:与VR相比,N2O显著降低了唾液皮质醇浓度和随后的生理性焦虑(P = 0.0089)。然而,针刺和溶液沉积疼痛评分没有明显差异。结论:虽然VR和N2O在感知疼痛减轻方面可能具有可比性,但N2O在生理性镇痛和焦虑缓解方面比VR更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual Reality Distraction vs Nitrous Oxide for Reducing Anxiety and Injection Pain.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare nitrous oxide (N2O) vs virtual reality (VR) as methods for reducing pain and anxiety during a dental injection. The primary objectives were to assess acute changes in stress responses by comparing salivary cortisol levels between the 2 groups and differences in injection pain scores.

Methods: A total of 132 female subjects serving as their own control received maxillary lateral incisor infiltration injections with the use of either N2O or a VR headset during separate appointments spaced at least 2 weeks apart. Salivary cortisol samples were collected at 6 times throughout each appointment. Pain scores for needle insertion and solution deposition were recorded. Data were analyzed statistically using Wald and paired t tests.

Results: N2O significantly lowered salivary cortisol concentrations and subsequent physiologic anxiety as compared with VR (P = .0089). However, no significant differences in needle insertion or solution deposition pain scores were found.

Conclusion: Although VR and N2O may be comparable in terms of perceived pain reduction, N2O was a more effective method than VR for physiologic analgesia and anxiolysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信