{"title":"热机械刺激对IANB注射疼痛的影响。","authors":"Dharanshi Amlani, Devendra Nagpal, Pooja Rathi, Gagandeep Lamba, Purva Chaudhari, Prabhat Singh","doi":"10.2344/23-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are very few studies on the use of a thermomechanical device for reducing injection pain in pediatric dentistry, especially for inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a thermomechanical device (Buzzy, Pain Care Labs) for reducing pain associated with an IANB for pediatric dental patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 children, 5 to 8 years of age undergoing bilateral mandibular dental treatment requiring IANBs, were included in this randomized crossover study. The test group received an IANB with the use of the thermomechanical device and the control group received the IANB without the device. The groups were randomized, and the IANB was readministered after a 1-week washout interval. Subjective evaluation of pain was done utilizing the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and objective evaluation of pain was assessed using the Faces, Leg, Activity, Consolability, Cry (FLACC) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant reductions in pain for the objective and subjective measures were noted in the thermomechanical device group (P ≤ .00016). No differences in pain ratings were noted in groups based on treatment sequence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less pain was observed when the thermomechanical device (Buzzy) was used during IANB injections vs without the device.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"72 3","pages":"137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Thermomechanical Stimulation on Pain During IANB Injections.\",\"authors\":\"Dharanshi Amlani, Devendra Nagpal, Pooja Rathi, Gagandeep Lamba, Purva Chaudhari, Prabhat Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2344/23-0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are very few studies on the use of a thermomechanical device for reducing injection pain in pediatric dentistry, especially for inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a thermomechanical device (Buzzy, Pain Care Labs) for reducing pain associated with an IANB for pediatric dental patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 children, 5 to 8 years of age undergoing bilateral mandibular dental treatment requiring IANBs, were included in this randomized crossover study. The test group received an IANB with the use of the thermomechanical device and the control group received the IANB without the device. The groups were randomized, and the IANB was readministered after a 1-week washout interval. Subjective evaluation of pain was done utilizing the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and objective evaluation of pain was assessed using the Faces, Leg, Activity, Consolability, Cry (FLACC) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant reductions in pain for the objective and subjective measures were noted in the thermomechanical device group (P ≤ .00016). No differences in pain ratings were noted in groups based on treatment sequence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less pain was observed when the thermomechanical device (Buzzy) was used during IANB injections vs without the device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"137-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2344/23-0047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/23-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在儿童牙科,特别是下牙槽神经阻滞(IANBs)中,使用热机械装置减轻注射疼痛的研究很少。本研究的目的是评估热机械装置(Buzzy, Pain Care Labs)减轻儿童牙科患者IANB相关疼痛的疗效。方法:本随机交叉研究共纳入30例5 - 8岁接受双侧下颌牙治疗需要IANBs的儿童。试验组接受带热机械装置的IANB,对照组接受不带热机械装置的IANB。各组随机分组,洗脱间隔1周后重新给予IANB。主观疼痛评价采用Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表,客观疼痛评价采用面部、腿部、活动、安慰、哭泣(FLACC)量表。结果:在客观和主观测量中,热机械装置组疼痛明显减轻(P≤0.00016)。根据治疗顺序,各组疼痛评分无差异。结论:在IANB注射过程中使用热机械装置(Buzzy)比不使用热机械装置时疼痛减轻。
Effect of Thermomechanical Stimulation on Pain During IANB Injections.
Objective: There are very few studies on the use of a thermomechanical device for reducing injection pain in pediatric dentistry, especially for inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a thermomechanical device (Buzzy, Pain Care Labs) for reducing pain associated with an IANB for pediatric dental patients.
Methods: A total of 30 children, 5 to 8 years of age undergoing bilateral mandibular dental treatment requiring IANBs, were included in this randomized crossover study. The test group received an IANB with the use of the thermomechanical device and the control group received the IANB without the device. The groups were randomized, and the IANB was readministered after a 1-week washout interval. Subjective evaluation of pain was done utilizing the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and objective evaluation of pain was assessed using the Faces, Leg, Activity, Consolability, Cry (FLACC) scale.
Results: Significant reductions in pain for the objective and subjective measures were noted in the thermomechanical device group (P ≤ .00016). No differences in pain ratings were noted in groups based on treatment sequence.
Conclusions: Less pain was observed when the thermomechanical device (Buzzy) was used during IANB injections vs without the device.