脑CT在门诊肿瘤患者颅内疾病诊断中的应用:不加对比扫描对加对比扫描诊断价值的评价。

Ethan Wang, Azad Darbandi, Long Tu, Leomar Y Ballester, Charles de Jesus Morales, Melissa Chen, Maria K Gule-Monroe, Jason M Johnson
{"title":"脑CT在门诊肿瘤患者颅内疾病诊断中的应用:不加对比扫描对加对比扫描诊断价值的评价。","authors":"Ethan Wang, Azad Darbandi, Long Tu, Leomar Y Ballester, Charles de Jesus Morales, Melissa Chen, Maria K Gule-Monroe, Jason M Johnson","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Brain imaging with MRI or CT is standard in screening for intracranial disease among ambulatory cancer patients. Although MRI offers greater sensitivity, CT is frequently employed due to its accessibility, affordability, and faster acquisition time. However, the necessity of routinely performing a non-contrast CT with the contrast-enhanced study is unknown. This study evaluates the clinical and economic utility of the non-contrast portion of the brain CT examination.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A board-certified neuroradiologist reviewed 737 brain CT reports from outpatients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who underwent contrast and non-contrast CT for cancer staging (October 2014 to March 2016) to assess if significant findings were identified only on non-contrast CT. A GPT-3 model was then fine-tuned to extract reports with a high likelihood of unique and significant non-contrast findings from 1,980 additional brain CT reports (January 2017 to April 2022). These reports were manually reviewed by two neuroradiologists, with adjudication by a third reviewer if needed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of non-contrast CT inclusion was then calculated based on Medicare reimbursement and the 95% confidence interval of the proportion of all reports in which non-contrast CT was necessary for identifying significant findings RESULTS: Seven of 737 reports in the initial dataset revealed significant findings unique to the non-contrast CT, all of which were hemorrhage. The GPT-3 model identified 145 additional reports with a high unique non-contrast CT finding likelihood for manual review from the second dataset of 1,980 reports. 19 of these reports were found to have unique and significant non-contrast CT findings. In total, 0.96% (95% CI: 0.63% -1.40%) of reports had significant findings identified only on non-contrast CT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for identification of a single significant finding on non-contrast CT missed on the contrast-enhanced study was $1,855 to $4,122.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In brain CT for ambulatory screening for intracranial disease in cancer patients, non-contrast CT offers limited additional diagnostic value compared to contrast-enhanced CT alone. Considering the associated financial cost, workload, and patient radiation exposure associated with performing a non-contrast CT, contrast-enhanced brain CT alone is sufficient for cancer staging in asymptomatic cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>GPT-3= Generative Pretrained Transformers 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain CT for Diagnosis of Intracranial Disease in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Scanning Without Contrast Prior to With Contrast.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Wang, Azad Darbandi, Long Tu, Leomar Y Ballester, Charles de Jesus Morales, Melissa Chen, Maria K Gule-Monroe, Jason M Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Brain imaging with MRI or CT is standard in screening for intracranial disease among ambulatory cancer patients. Although MRI offers greater sensitivity, CT is frequently employed due to its accessibility, affordability, and faster acquisition time. However, the necessity of routinely performing a non-contrast CT with the contrast-enhanced study is unknown. This study evaluates the clinical and economic utility of the non-contrast portion of the brain CT examination.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A board-certified neuroradiologist reviewed 737 brain CT reports from outpatients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who underwent contrast and non-contrast CT for cancer staging (October 2014 to March 2016) to assess if significant findings were identified only on non-contrast CT. A GPT-3 model was then fine-tuned to extract reports with a high likelihood of unique and significant non-contrast findings from 1,980 additional brain CT reports (January 2017 to April 2022). These reports were manually reviewed by two neuroradiologists, with adjudication by a third reviewer if needed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of non-contrast CT inclusion was then calculated based on Medicare reimbursement and the 95% confidence interval of the proportion of all reports in which non-contrast CT was necessary for identifying significant findings RESULTS: Seven of 737 reports in the initial dataset revealed significant findings unique to the non-contrast CT, all of which were hemorrhage. The GPT-3 model identified 145 additional reports with a high unique non-contrast CT finding likelihood for manual review from the second dataset of 1,980 reports. 19 of these reports were found to have unique and significant non-contrast CT findings. In total, 0.96% (95% CI: 0.63% -1.40%) of reports had significant findings identified only on non-contrast CT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for identification of a single significant finding on non-contrast CT missed on the contrast-enhanced study was $1,855 to $4,122.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In brain CT for ambulatory screening for intracranial disease in cancer patients, non-contrast CT offers limited additional diagnostic value compared to contrast-enhanced CT alone. Considering the associated financial cost, workload, and patient radiation exposure associated with performing a non-contrast CT, contrast-enhanced brain CT alone is sufficient for cancer staging in asymptomatic cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>GPT-3= Generative Pretrained Transformers 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8995\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:MRI或CT脑成像是筛查非流动肿瘤患者颅内疾病的标准方法。尽管MRI具有更高的灵敏度,但由于其可及性、可负担性和更快的采集时间,CT经常被采用。然而,常规进行非对比CT增强检查的必要性尚不清楚。本研究评估了脑CT检查的非对比部分的临床和经济效用。材料和方法:一名委员会认证的神经放射学家回顾了MD安德森癌症中心门诊患者的737份脑CT报告,这些患者接受了对比和非对比CT来评估癌症分期(2014年10月至2016年3月),以评估是否仅在非对比CT上发现了重大发现。然后对GPT-3模型进行微调,以从1980份额外的脑CT报告(2017年1月至2022年4月)中提取具有高可能性的独特且重要的非对比结果的报告。这些报告由两名神经放射学家手工审查,如果需要,由第三名审稿人裁决。然后,根据医疗保险报销和所有报告中需要进行非对比CT检查以确定重要发现的比例的95%置信区间,计算非对比CT纳入的增量成本-效果比。结果:初始数据集中的737份报告中有7份显示了非对比CT独有的重要发现,所有这些发现都是出血。GPT-3模型从1,980份报告的第二个数据集中确定了145份具有高独特非对比CT发现可能性的额外报告。这些报告中有19例发现有独特和显著的非对比CT表现。总的来说,0.96% (95% CI: 0.63% -1.40%)的报告仅在非对比CT上发现了显著的发现。在对比增强研究中,在非对比CT上识别单个重要发现的增量成本-效果比为1855美元至4122美元。结论:在用于肿瘤患者颅内疾病动态筛查的脑CT中,与单独增强CT相比,非对比CT提供的额外诊断价值有限。考虑到相关的财务成本、工作量和与进行非对比CT相关的患者辐射暴露,在无症状的癌症患者中,仅进行对比增强脑CT就足以确定癌症分期。缩写:GPT-3=生成预训练变形金刚3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain CT for Diagnosis of Intracranial Disease in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Scanning Without Contrast Prior to With Contrast.

Background and purpose: Brain imaging with MRI or CT is standard in screening for intracranial disease among ambulatory cancer patients. Although MRI offers greater sensitivity, CT is frequently employed due to its accessibility, affordability, and faster acquisition time. However, the necessity of routinely performing a non-contrast CT with the contrast-enhanced study is unknown. This study evaluates the clinical and economic utility of the non-contrast portion of the brain CT examination.

Materials and methods: A board-certified neuroradiologist reviewed 737 brain CT reports from outpatients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who underwent contrast and non-contrast CT for cancer staging (October 2014 to March 2016) to assess if significant findings were identified only on non-contrast CT. A GPT-3 model was then fine-tuned to extract reports with a high likelihood of unique and significant non-contrast findings from 1,980 additional brain CT reports (January 2017 to April 2022). These reports were manually reviewed by two neuroradiologists, with adjudication by a third reviewer if needed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of non-contrast CT inclusion was then calculated based on Medicare reimbursement and the 95% confidence interval of the proportion of all reports in which non-contrast CT was necessary for identifying significant findings RESULTS: Seven of 737 reports in the initial dataset revealed significant findings unique to the non-contrast CT, all of which were hemorrhage. The GPT-3 model identified 145 additional reports with a high unique non-contrast CT finding likelihood for manual review from the second dataset of 1,980 reports. 19 of these reports were found to have unique and significant non-contrast CT findings. In total, 0.96% (95% CI: 0.63% -1.40%) of reports had significant findings identified only on non-contrast CT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for identification of a single significant finding on non-contrast CT missed on the contrast-enhanced study was $1,855 to $4,122.

Conclusions: In brain CT for ambulatory screening for intracranial disease in cancer patients, non-contrast CT offers limited additional diagnostic value compared to contrast-enhanced CT alone. Considering the associated financial cost, workload, and patient radiation exposure associated with performing a non-contrast CT, contrast-enhanced brain CT alone is sufficient for cancer staging in asymptomatic cancer patients.

Abbreviations: GPT-3= Generative Pretrained Transformers 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信