ADHEAR骨传导装置在儿科患者队列中的听力学性能、并发症和依从性

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Hidde Kees Krijnen, Luke Sterry, Anne Elizabeth Child-Hymas, Max Sallis Osborne, Myrthe Hol, Ann-Louise Mc Dermott
{"title":"ADHEAR骨传导装置在儿科患者队列中的听力学性能、并发症和依从性","authors":"Hidde Kees Krijnen, Luke Sterry, Anne Elizabeth Child-Hymas, Max Sallis Osborne, Myrthe Hol, Ann-Louise Mc Dermott","doi":"10.1159/000548291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ADHEAR is a non-surgical Bone Conduction Device (BCD) that makes use of an adhesive adapter. While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy with regards to audiological performance, safety and compliance, data on real-world paediatric cohorts is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analysed data from paediatric patients fitted with ADHEAR at a tertiary centre between January 2017 and September 2024. Baseline characteristics such as hearing loss aetiology were recorded. Long-term free-field aided and unaided warble-tone audiometry was performed within a subsample of 19 patients. Compliance and reasons for discontinuation were recorded over a follow-up period of up to 78 months and based on the last recorded status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 children (mean age: 10.1 years) were included. Mean functional gain was 22.7 (95% CI: 18.3 - 27.1) decibels hearing loss (dB HL) and the mean effective gain was 20.3 dB HL (95% CI: 20.3 (16.4, 24.2). Skin complications were low and reported in 16 children (14.4%), of whom 7 needed to temporarily refrain from device use. Long-term compliance was 40.9% (median follow-up: 24 months). Key reasons for discontinuation included lack of perceived benefit (23.5%), appearance or social stigmatization issues (20.6%), and practical issues with adhesives (16.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For congenital malformation and chronic suppurative otitis media patients, the ADHEAR provides effective amplification, although air-bone gap closure is suboptimal. Complications associated with device use were relatively rare and mild in nature. Compliance rates were notably lower than observed in other studies. Appearance and social stigmatization issues should be addressed during consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audiological performance, complications and compliance of the ADHEAR Bone Conduction Device in a paediatric patient cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Hidde Kees Krijnen, Luke Sterry, Anne Elizabeth Child-Hymas, Max Sallis Osborne, Myrthe Hol, Ann-Louise Mc Dermott\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ADHEAR is a non-surgical Bone Conduction Device (BCD) that makes use of an adhesive adapter. While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy with regards to audiological performance, safety and compliance, data on real-world paediatric cohorts is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analysed data from paediatric patients fitted with ADHEAR at a tertiary centre between January 2017 and September 2024. Baseline characteristics such as hearing loss aetiology were recorded. Long-term free-field aided and unaided warble-tone audiometry was performed within a subsample of 19 patients. Compliance and reasons for discontinuation were recorded over a follow-up period of up to 78 months and based on the last recorded status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 children (mean age: 10.1 years) were included. Mean functional gain was 22.7 (95% CI: 18.3 - 27.1) decibels hearing loss (dB HL) and the mean effective gain was 20.3 dB HL (95% CI: 20.3 (16.4, 24.2). Skin complications were low and reported in 16 children (14.4%), of whom 7 needed to temporarily refrain from device use. Long-term compliance was 40.9% (median follow-up: 24 months). Key reasons for discontinuation included lack of perceived benefit (23.5%), appearance or social stigmatization issues (20.6%), and practical issues with adhesives (16.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For congenital malformation and chronic suppurative otitis media patients, the ADHEAR provides effective amplification, although air-bone gap closure is suboptimal. Complications associated with device use were relatively rare and mild in nature. Compliance rates were notably lower than observed in other studies. Appearance and social stigmatization issues should be addressed during consultation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:ADHEAR是一种非手术骨传导装置(BCD),它使用粘合剂适配器。虽然临床试验已经证明了它在听力学性能、安全性和依从性方面的有效性,但实际儿科队列的数据很少。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2017年1月至2024年9月在三级中心安装ADHEAR的儿科患者的数据。记录听力损失的病因学等基线特征。对19例患者进行了长期自由场辅助和非辅助的颤音听力测定。在长达78个月的随访期间,根据上次记录的状态记录了依从性和停药原因。结果:共纳入111例患儿,平均年龄10.1岁。平均功能增益为22.7 (95% CI: 18.3 - 27.1)分贝听力损失(dB HL),平均有效增益为20.3 dB HL (95% CI: 20.3(16.4, 24.2))。皮肤并发症较低,16名儿童(14.4%)报告,其中7名需要暂时避免使用器械。长期依从性为40.9%(中位随访时间:24个月)。停用的主要原因包括缺乏感知到的益处(23.5%),外观或社会污名问题(20.6%),以及粘合剂的实际问题(16.2%)。结论:对于先天性畸形和慢性化脓性中耳炎患者,ADHEAR提供了有效的放大,尽管气骨间隙闭合不理想。与器械使用相关的并发症相对罕见,性质轻微。依从率明显低于其他研究中观察到的。外貌和社会污名化问题应在协商期间解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Audiological performance, complications and compliance of the ADHEAR Bone Conduction Device in a paediatric patient cohort.

Introduction: The ADHEAR is a non-surgical Bone Conduction Device (BCD) that makes use of an adhesive adapter. While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy with regards to audiological performance, safety and compliance, data on real-world paediatric cohorts is scarce.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed data from paediatric patients fitted with ADHEAR at a tertiary centre between January 2017 and September 2024. Baseline characteristics such as hearing loss aetiology were recorded. Long-term free-field aided and unaided warble-tone audiometry was performed within a subsample of 19 patients. Compliance and reasons for discontinuation were recorded over a follow-up period of up to 78 months and based on the last recorded status.

Results: A total of 111 children (mean age: 10.1 years) were included. Mean functional gain was 22.7 (95% CI: 18.3 - 27.1) decibels hearing loss (dB HL) and the mean effective gain was 20.3 dB HL (95% CI: 20.3 (16.4, 24.2). Skin complications were low and reported in 16 children (14.4%), of whom 7 needed to temporarily refrain from device use. Long-term compliance was 40.9% (median follow-up: 24 months). Key reasons for discontinuation included lack of perceived benefit (23.5%), appearance or social stigmatization issues (20.6%), and practical issues with adhesives (16.2%).

Conclusion: For congenital malformation and chronic suppurative otitis media patients, the ADHEAR provides effective amplification, although air-bone gap closure is suboptimal. Complications associated with device use were relatively rare and mild in nature. Compliance rates were notably lower than observed in other studies. Appearance and social stigmatization issues should be addressed during consultation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信