Shiling Wu, Kun Li, Jiang Long, Chenchen Zhang, Rui Li, Bochao Cheng, Minne Cao, Wei Deng
{"title":"老年患者接受电休克治疗后谵妄的危险因素:锂和奎硫平的作用。","authors":"Shiling Wu, Kun Li, Jiang Long, Chenchen Zhang, Rui Li, Bochao Cheng, Minne Cao, Wei Deng","doi":"10.31083/AP45431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postictal delirium (PID) is a significant and often underrecognized adverse effect associated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in geriatric patients. Despite its clinical relevance, the specific risk factors contributing to the development of PID in this vulnerable population remain inadequately understood, which may affect treatment outcomes and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 168 elderly patients who underwent ECT between 2009 and 2020 at a general hospital in China. Univariate analyses of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were performed to identify variables for inclusion in a logistic regression model. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between these variables and PID occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of PID was 20.8% (35/168) among the study cohort. Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences between PID and non-PID groups for lithium (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6.67, <i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.010), quetiapine (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 4.36, <i>p</i> = 0.037), number of ECT sessions (<i>U</i> = 3065.50, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and response rate (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 12.86, <i>p <</i> 0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that lithium (odds ratio (OR) = 5.128; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and quetiapine (OR = 2.562; <i>p</i> = 0.024) were significantly associated with PID.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that lithium and quetiapine use significantly increase the risk of developing PID, underscoring the need for clinical vigilance. Careful consideration of these medications when planning ECT treatment is recommended to minimize the risk of postictal complications and optimize therapeutic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"26 4","pages":"45431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Postictal Delirium in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy: The Role of Lithium and Quetiapine.\",\"authors\":\"Shiling Wu, Kun Li, Jiang Long, Chenchen Zhang, Rui Li, Bochao Cheng, Minne Cao, Wei Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/AP45431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postictal delirium (PID) is a significant and often underrecognized adverse effect associated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in geriatric patients. Despite its clinical relevance, the specific risk factors contributing to the development of PID in this vulnerable population remain inadequately understood, which may affect treatment outcomes and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 168 elderly patients who underwent ECT between 2009 and 2020 at a general hospital in China. Univariate analyses of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were performed to identify variables for inclusion in a logistic regression model. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between these variables and PID occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of PID was 20.8% (35/168) among the study cohort. Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences between PID and non-PID groups for lithium (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6.67, <i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.010), quetiapine (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 4.36, <i>p</i> = 0.037), number of ECT sessions (<i>U</i> = 3065.50, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and response rate (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> = 12.86, <i>p <</i> 0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that lithium (odds ratio (OR) = 5.128; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and quetiapine (OR = 2.562; <i>p</i> = 0.024) were significantly associated with PID.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that lithium and quetiapine use significantly increase the risk of developing PID, underscoring the need for clinical vigilance. Careful consideration of these medications when planning ECT treatment is recommended to minimize the risk of postictal complications and optimize therapeutic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"45431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP45431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP45431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:老年患者电休克治疗(ECT)后谵妄(PID)是一种显著且常被忽视的不良反应。尽管具有临床意义,但在这一弱势人群中导致PID发展的具体危险因素仍未得到充分了解,这可能会影响治疗结果和患者安全。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了2009年至2020年在中国一家综合医院接受ECT治疗的168名老年患者的数据。对社会人口学和临床特征进行单因素分析,以确定纳入逻辑回归模型的变量。采用多元二元logistic回归分析来确定这些变量与PID发生的关系。结果:研究队列中PID的发生率为20.8%(35/168)。单因素分析显示,在锂离子治疗(χ 2 = 6.67, p = 0.010)、喹硫平治疗(χ 2 = 4.36, p = 0.037)、ECT治疗次数(U = 3065.50, p = 0.003)和有效率(χ 2 = 12.86, p = 0.001)方面,PID组与非PID组之间存在统计学差异。Logistic回归分析显示,锂(优势比(OR) = 5.128;p = 0.009)和喹硫平(OR = 2.562; p = 0.024)与PID显著相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,锂和喹硫平的使用显著增加了发生PID的风险,强调了临床警惕的必要性。建议在计划ECT治疗时仔细考虑这些药物,以尽量减少术后并发症的风险并优化治疗结果。
Risk Factors for Postictal Delirium in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy: The Role of Lithium and Quetiapine.
Background: Postictal delirium (PID) is a significant and often underrecognized adverse effect associated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in geriatric patients. Despite its clinical relevance, the specific risk factors contributing to the development of PID in this vulnerable population remain inadequately understood, which may affect treatment outcomes and patient safety.
Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 168 elderly patients who underwent ECT between 2009 and 2020 at a general hospital in China. Univariate analyses of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were performed to identify variables for inclusion in a logistic regression model. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between these variables and PID occurrence.
Results: The incidence of PID was 20.8% (35/168) among the study cohort. Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences between PID and non-PID groups for lithium (χ2 = 6.67, p= 0.010), quetiapine (χ2 = 4.36, p = 0.037), number of ECT sessions (U = 3065.50, p = 0.003), and response rate (χ2 = 12.86, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that lithium (odds ratio (OR) = 5.128; p = 0.009) and quetiapine (OR = 2.562; p = 0.024) were significantly associated with PID.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that lithium and quetiapine use significantly increase the risk of developing PID, underscoring the need for clinical vigilance. Careful consideration of these medications when planning ECT treatment is recommended to minimize the risk of postictal complications and optimize therapeutic outcomes.