Lorenzo Ferro Desideri, Nina Eldridge, Nicola Sagurski, Jonathan Brenneisen, Florian Heussen, Raphael Sznitman, Sebastian Wolf, Martin Zinkernagel, Rodrigo Anguita
{"title":"玻璃体后脱离对玻璃体黄斑界面病变患者OCT扫描注释一致性的评价。","authors":"Lorenzo Ferro Desideri, Nina Eldridge, Nicola Sagurski, Jonathan Brenneisen, Florian Heussen, Raphael Sznitman, Sebastian Wolf, Martin Zinkernagel, Rodrigo Anguita","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate inter-grader variability in posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) classification in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and identify challenges in defining a reliable ground truth for artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 437 horizontal SD-OCT B-scans were retrospectively selected and independently annotated by six experienced ophthalmologists adopting four categories: 'full PVD', 'partial PVD', 'no PVD', and 'ungradable'. Inter-grader agreement was assessed using pairwise Cohen's kappa scores. Consensus levels, accuracy, recall, specificity, and grading time were also analyzed using the majority vote as reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall average Cohen's kappa was 0.57. Agreement was highest for 'partial PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.70), followed by 'full PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.65), and lowest for 'no PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.14), indicating substantial diagnostic variability. Full consensus was achieved in only 31.1% of OCT scans, while 11.4% required adjudication. The sensitivity for 'no PVD' was notably low (0.35 ± 0.32), and misclassified OCT scans took significantly longer to grade (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results underscore challenges associated with reliable OCT-based classification of PVD in patients with diseases of the vitreomacular interface, especially for cases with completely attached vitreous. Improving inter-grader agreement through consensus grading and advanced imaging modalities will be critical for establishing a solid ground truth to support reliable, AI-driven PVD detection systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Posterior Vitreous Detachment Annotation Consistency on OCT Scans in Patients with Disease of the Vitreomacular Interface.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Ferro Desideri, Nina Eldridge, Nicola Sagurski, Jonathan Brenneisen, Florian Heussen, Raphael Sznitman, Sebastian Wolf, Martin Zinkernagel, Rodrigo Anguita\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate inter-grader variability in posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) classification in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and identify challenges in defining a reliable ground truth for artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 437 horizontal SD-OCT B-scans were retrospectively selected and independently annotated by six experienced ophthalmologists adopting four categories: 'full PVD', 'partial PVD', 'no PVD', and 'ungradable'. Inter-grader agreement was assessed using pairwise Cohen's kappa scores. Consensus levels, accuracy, recall, specificity, and grading time were also analyzed using the majority vote as reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall average Cohen's kappa was 0.57. Agreement was highest for 'partial PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.70), followed by 'full PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.65), and lowest for 'no PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.14), indicating substantial diagnostic variability. Full consensus was achieved in only 31.1% of OCT scans, while 11.4% required adjudication. The sensitivity for 'no PVD' was notably low (0.35 ± 0.32), and misclassified OCT scans took significantly longer to grade (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results underscore challenges associated with reliable OCT-based classification of PVD in patients with diseases of the vitreomacular interface, especially for cases with completely attached vitreous. Improving inter-grader agreement through consensus grading and advanced imaging modalities will be critical for establishing a solid ground truth to support reliable, AI-driven PVD detection systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004668\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Posterior Vitreous Detachment Annotation Consistency on OCT Scans in Patients with Disease of the Vitreomacular Interface.
Purpose: To evaluate inter-grader variability in posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) classification in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and identify challenges in defining a reliable ground truth for artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools.
Methods: A total of 437 horizontal SD-OCT B-scans were retrospectively selected and independently annotated by six experienced ophthalmologists adopting four categories: 'full PVD', 'partial PVD', 'no PVD', and 'ungradable'. Inter-grader agreement was assessed using pairwise Cohen's kappa scores. Consensus levels, accuracy, recall, specificity, and grading time were also analyzed using the majority vote as reference.
Results: The overall average Cohen's kappa was 0.57. Agreement was highest for 'partial PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.70), followed by 'full PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.65), and lowest for 'no PVD' (Cohen's kappa = 0.14), indicating substantial diagnostic variability. Full consensus was achieved in only 31.1% of OCT scans, while 11.4% required adjudication. The sensitivity for 'no PVD' was notably low (0.35 ± 0.32), and misclassified OCT scans took significantly longer to grade (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our results underscore challenges associated with reliable OCT-based classification of PVD in patients with diseases of the vitreomacular interface, especially for cases with completely attached vitreous. Improving inter-grader agreement through consensus grading and advanced imaging modalities will be critical for establishing a solid ground truth to support reliable, AI-driven PVD detection systems.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.