绘制见解:探索参与者如何体验丰富的图片访谈,以研究卫生专业教育中的复杂问题。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tim Dubé, Monica Molinaro, Roger Strasser, Saleem Razack, Erin Cameron
{"title":"绘制见解:探索参与者如何体验丰富的图片访谈,以研究卫生专业教育中的复杂问题。","authors":"Tim Dubé, Monica Molinaro, Roger Strasser, Saleem Razack, Erin Cameron","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10473-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Innovative qualitative approaches are essential for exploring how health professions education (HPE) can address complex, value-laden constructs such as social accountability. Visual elicitation techniques, including rich picture interviews (RPIs), offer distinctive opportunities to surface layered, affective, and contextually embedded understandings. This methodological study examines participant perspectives on the use of RPIs within a broader qualitative interpretive description on social accountability. 46 participants, including learners, community representatives, faculty, and institutional leaders, created rich pictures (20-30 min) followed by semi-structured interviews (60 min) conducted virtually in English or French. Importantly, a dedicated segment of each interview explicitly elicited participants' reflections on the RPI process itself, including its accessibility, relevance, and perceived value. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Three overarching themes captured participants' experiences: (a) from hesitation to reflective engagement, (b) visual thinking as a catalyst for dialogue and adaptability, and (c) affordances and boundaries of RPIs. Many began with apprehension, often tied to artistic skill or ambiguity of the task, yet valued RPIs for structuring reflection, deepening emotional engagement, and anchoring abstract concepts in personalized, tangible representations. Participants noted the method's adaptability across cultural, linguistic, and professional contexts, while also identifying barriers such as discomfort with drawing or the abstract nature of social accountability. By documenting these experiences across diverse partner groups, this study offers practical guidance for employing RPIs in HPE and related fields. RPIs can serve not only as data collection tools but as reflective, generative spaces that bridge abstract ideals with concrete experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drawing insights: exploring how participants experience rich picture interviews for studying complex issues in health professions education.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Dubé, Monica Molinaro, Roger Strasser, Saleem Razack, Erin Cameron\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-025-10473-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Innovative qualitative approaches are essential for exploring how health professions education (HPE) can address complex, value-laden constructs such as social accountability. Visual elicitation techniques, including rich picture interviews (RPIs), offer distinctive opportunities to surface layered, affective, and contextually embedded understandings. This methodological study examines participant perspectives on the use of RPIs within a broader qualitative interpretive description on social accountability. 46 participants, including learners, community representatives, faculty, and institutional leaders, created rich pictures (20-30 min) followed by semi-structured interviews (60 min) conducted virtually in English or French. Importantly, a dedicated segment of each interview explicitly elicited participants' reflections on the RPI process itself, including its accessibility, relevance, and perceived value. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Three overarching themes captured participants' experiences: (a) from hesitation to reflective engagement, (b) visual thinking as a catalyst for dialogue and adaptability, and (c) affordances and boundaries of RPIs. Many began with apprehension, often tied to artistic skill or ambiguity of the task, yet valued RPIs for structuring reflection, deepening emotional engagement, and anchoring abstract concepts in personalized, tangible representations. Participants noted the method's adaptability across cultural, linguistic, and professional contexts, while also identifying barriers such as discomfort with drawing or the abstract nature of social accountability. By documenting these experiences across diverse partner groups, this study offers practical guidance for employing RPIs in HPE and related fields. RPIs can serve not only as data collection tools but as reflective, generative spaces that bridge abstract ideals with concrete experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10473-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10473-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创新的定性方法对于探索卫生专业教育(HPE)如何处理复杂的、价值承载的结构(如社会责任)至关重要。视觉启发技术,包括富图片访谈(rpi),提供了独特的机会来表面分层,情感和上下文嵌入的理解。本方法学研究考察了参与者在更广泛的社会责任定性解释描述中使用RPIs的观点。包括学习者、社区代表、教师和机构领导在内的46名参与者制作了丰富的图片(20-30分钟),随后进行了半结构化的访谈(60分钟),以英语或法语进行虚拟访谈。重要的是,每次访谈都有一个专门的环节明确地引出参与者对RPI过程本身的反思,包括其可访问性、相关性和感知价值。数据分析采用Braun和Clarke的反身性主题分析。三个主要主题捕捉了参与者的经历:(a)从犹豫到反思参与,(b)视觉思维作为对话和适应性的催化剂,以及(c) rpi的启示和边界。许多人一开始都有忧虑,通常与艺术技巧或任务的模糊性有关,但他们认为RPIs有助于构建反思,深化情感投入,并将抽象概念锚定在个性化的、有形的表现中。参与者注意到该方法在不同文化、语言和专业背景下的适应性,同时也发现了一些障碍,如不习惯绘画或社会责任的抽象性质。通过记录不同合作伙伴群体的这些经验,本研究为在HPE和相关领域使用rpi提供了实践指导。rpi不仅可以作为数据收集工具,还可以作为连接抽象理想与具体经验的反思和生成空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drawing insights: exploring how participants experience rich picture interviews for studying complex issues in health professions education.

Innovative qualitative approaches are essential for exploring how health professions education (HPE) can address complex, value-laden constructs such as social accountability. Visual elicitation techniques, including rich picture interviews (RPIs), offer distinctive opportunities to surface layered, affective, and contextually embedded understandings. This methodological study examines participant perspectives on the use of RPIs within a broader qualitative interpretive description on social accountability. 46 participants, including learners, community representatives, faculty, and institutional leaders, created rich pictures (20-30 min) followed by semi-structured interviews (60 min) conducted virtually in English or French. Importantly, a dedicated segment of each interview explicitly elicited participants' reflections on the RPI process itself, including its accessibility, relevance, and perceived value. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Three overarching themes captured participants' experiences: (a) from hesitation to reflective engagement, (b) visual thinking as a catalyst for dialogue and adaptability, and (c) affordances and boundaries of RPIs. Many began with apprehension, often tied to artistic skill or ambiguity of the task, yet valued RPIs for structuring reflection, deepening emotional engagement, and anchoring abstract concepts in personalized, tangible representations. Participants noted the method's adaptability across cultural, linguistic, and professional contexts, while also identifying barriers such as discomfort with drawing or the abstract nature of social accountability. By documenting these experiences across diverse partner groups, this study offers practical guidance for employing RPIs in HPE and related fields. RPIs can serve not only as data collection tools but as reflective, generative spaces that bridge abstract ideals with concrete experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信