抗菌素耐药性的卫生系统驱动因素:默西塞德郡医院和长期护理设施感染预防和控制的定性探索。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yussif Alhassan, Maria Moore, Kirsten A Duda, Fabrice E Graf, Stacy Todd, Joseph M Lewis, Nicholas Feasey, Miriam Taegtmeyer
{"title":"抗菌素耐药性的卫生系统驱动因素:默西塞德郡医院和长期护理设施感染预防和控制的定性探索。","authors":"Yussif Alhassan, Maria Moore, Kirsten A Duda, Fabrice E Graf, Stacy Todd, Joseph M Lewis, Nicholas Feasey, Miriam Taegtmeyer","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) transmission is shaped by a complex interplay of health system factors, many of which remain underexplored or insufficiently addressed. This study investigates concrete systemic transmission drivers in hospitals and long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for older adults in Merseyside, UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 37 purposively selected participants across hospitals, LTCFs, community settings, and ambulance services. Interviews were informed by the WHO Health System Building Blocks framework and explored AMR transmission pathways and drivers, barriers to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, and intervention strategies. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key perceived transmission points were identified: prolonged waits in overcrowded hospital areas, inter-facility transfers, and shared spaces within LTCFs and hospital wards. Contributing systemic AMR drivers included inadequate infrastructure, fragmented communication during care transitions, staff turnover, training gaps. Less recognised yet significant risks included the lack of consistent cleaning teams across wards; generic IPC guidelines ill-suited to specific care contexts; and weak administrative oversight of environmental hygiene. While AMR screening was widely recognised as problematic, its cost-effectiveness and clinical utility remain unclear. Communication failures during transfers emerged as an immediately addressable issue, while infrastructure deficits and workforce instability posed more persistent, systemic challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing AMR in care settings requires a context-specific, multi-component approach prioritising effective infection risk communication at care interfaces, tailored IPC protocols, and stable staffing. While long-term investment in infrastructure, screening and workforce is essential, immediate progress is possible through low-resource measures such as improved infection risk information systems and context-specific IPC guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health system drivers of antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative exploration of implications for infection prevention and control in hospitals and long-term care facilities in Merseyside.\",\"authors\":\"Yussif Alhassan, Maria Moore, Kirsten A Duda, Fabrice E Graf, Stacy Todd, Joseph M Lewis, Nicholas Feasey, Miriam Taegtmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) transmission is shaped by a complex interplay of health system factors, many of which remain underexplored or insufficiently addressed. This study investigates concrete systemic transmission drivers in hospitals and long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for older adults in Merseyside, UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 37 purposively selected participants across hospitals, LTCFs, community settings, and ambulance services. Interviews were informed by the WHO Health System Building Blocks framework and explored AMR transmission pathways and drivers, barriers to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, and intervention strategies. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key perceived transmission points were identified: prolonged waits in overcrowded hospital areas, inter-facility transfers, and shared spaces within LTCFs and hospital wards. Contributing systemic AMR drivers included inadequate infrastructure, fragmented communication during care transitions, staff turnover, training gaps. Less recognised yet significant risks included the lack of consistent cleaning teams across wards; generic IPC guidelines ill-suited to specific care contexts; and weak administrative oversight of environmental hygiene. While AMR screening was widely recognised as problematic, its cost-effectiveness and clinical utility remain unclear. Communication failures during transfers emerged as an immediately addressable issue, while infrastructure deficits and workforce instability posed more persistent, systemic challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing AMR in care settings requires a context-specific, multi-component approach prioritising effective infection risk communication at care interfaces, tailored IPC protocols, and stable staffing. While long-term investment in infrastructure, screening and workforce is essential, immediate progress is possible through low-resource measures such as improved infection risk information systems and context-specific IPC guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的传播是由卫生系统因素的复杂相互作用形成的,其中许多因素尚未得到充分探索或没有得到充分解决。本研究调查了英国默西塞德郡老年人医院和长期护理设施(ltcf)中具体的系统传播驱动因素。方法:通过半结构化访谈收集定性数据,有目的地选择来自医院、长期护理中心、社区设置和救护车服务的37名参与者。采访由世卫组织卫生系统构建模块框架提供信息,并探讨了抗生素耐药性的传播途径和驱动因素、感染预防和控制(IPC)做法的障碍以及干预战略。使用NVivo 12进行专题分析。结果:确定了三个关键的感知传播点:过度拥挤的医院区域的长时间等待,设施间转移以及ltcf和医院病房内的共享空间。造成系统性抗菌素耐药性的驱动因素包括基础设施不足、护理过渡期间沟通不完整、人员流失和培训缺口。人们很少认识到的重大风险包括:各个病房缺乏一致的清洁团队;不适合具体护理情况的IPC通用指南;环境卫生行政监管薄弱。虽然AMR筛查被广泛认为是有问题的,但其成本效益和临床效用仍不清楚。转移过程中的通信故障成为了一个可以立即解决的问题,而基础设施不足和劳动力不稳定则构成了更持久的系统性挑战。结论:解决护理环境中的抗菌素耐药性需要一种针对具体情况的多成分方法,优先考虑在护理界面进行有效的感染风险沟通,量身定制的IPC协议和稳定的人员配备。虽然对基础设施、筛查和劳动力的长期投资至关重要,但通过改进感染风险信息系统和针对具体情况的IPC指南等低资源措施,可以立即取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health system drivers of antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative exploration of implications for infection prevention and control in hospitals and long-term care facilities in Merseyside.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) transmission is shaped by a complex interplay of health system factors, many of which remain underexplored or insufficiently addressed. This study investigates concrete systemic transmission drivers in hospitals and long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for older adults in Merseyside, UK.

Methods: Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 37 purposively selected participants across hospitals, LTCFs, community settings, and ambulance services. Interviews were informed by the WHO Health System Building Blocks framework and explored AMR transmission pathways and drivers, barriers to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, and intervention strategies. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12.

Results: Three key perceived transmission points were identified: prolonged waits in overcrowded hospital areas, inter-facility transfers, and shared spaces within LTCFs and hospital wards. Contributing systemic AMR drivers included inadequate infrastructure, fragmented communication during care transitions, staff turnover, training gaps. Less recognised yet significant risks included the lack of consistent cleaning teams across wards; generic IPC guidelines ill-suited to specific care contexts; and weak administrative oversight of environmental hygiene. While AMR screening was widely recognised as problematic, its cost-effectiveness and clinical utility remain unclear. Communication failures during transfers emerged as an immediately addressable issue, while infrastructure deficits and workforce instability posed more persistent, systemic challenges.

Conclusion: Addressing AMR in care settings requires a context-specific, multi-component approach prioritising effective infection risk communication at care interfaces, tailored IPC protocols, and stable staffing. While long-term investment in infrastructure, screening and workforce is essential, immediate progress is possible through low-resource measures such as improved infection risk information systems and context-specific IPC guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信