替奈普酶在症状发作24小时内治疗大血管闭塞性卒中的疗效:ETERNAL-LVO随机对照试验。

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vignan Yogendrakumar, Bruce C V Campbell, Leonid Churilov, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Philip M C Choi, Dennis J Cordato, Niruta Dhimal, Liudmyla Olenko, Prodipta Guha, Gagan Sharma, Chushuang Chen, Amy McDonald, Vincent Thijs, Abul Mamun, Angela Dos Santos, Anna H Balabanski, Timothy J Kleinig, Ken S Butcher, Michael J Devlin, Fintan O'Rourke, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis, Christopher R Levi, Henry Ma, Mark W Parsons
{"title":"替奈普酶在症状发作24小时内治疗大血管闭塞性卒中的疗效:ETERNAL-LVO随机对照试验。","authors":"Vignan Yogendrakumar, Bruce C V Campbell, Leonid Churilov, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Philip M C Choi, Dennis J Cordato, Niruta Dhimal, Liudmyla Olenko, Prodipta Guha, Gagan Sharma, Chushuang Chen, Amy McDonald, Vincent Thijs, Abul Mamun, Angela Dos Santos, Anna H Balabanski, Timothy J Kleinig, Ken S Butcher, Michael J Devlin, Fintan O'Rourke, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis, Christopher R Levi, Henry Ma, Mark W Parsons","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset with a large vessel occlusion and target mismatch on perfusion computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ETERNAL-LVO was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, phase 3, superiority trial where adult participants with a large vessel occlusion, presenting within 24 hours of onset with salvageable tissue on computed tomography perfusion, were randomized to tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or standard care across 11 primary and comprehensive stroke centers in Australia. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 or return to baseline at 90 days via a modified Poisson regression model. Secondary outcomes include the modified Rankin Scale, considered as an ordinal variable, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following trial initiation, a supply shortage of the investigational product hindered recruitment. When supply resumed, phase 3 evidence had emerged supporting tenecteplase use within 4.5 hours of stroke onset, including large vessel occlusion. ETERNAL-LVO was, therefore, terminated early. Two hundred forty-two participants (median age: 73 years, 43% female, 79% undergoing EVT) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis; 120 received tenecteplase and 122 received standard care. No difference in the primary outcome was observed between the tenecteplase (n=44, 37%) and standard care (n=52, 43%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.66-1.21]; <i>P</i>=0.48). No significant differences in an ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale were observed between the 2 treatment groups. In a planned per-protocol analysis, the odds of improvement by 1 point in the modified Rankin Scale were doubled in the tenecteplase-treated transfer subgroup compared with standard care transfer patients (odds ratio, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.07-6.40]). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5 (4%) participants assigned to tenecteplase and was present in 1 (1%) participant assigned to standard care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with tenecteplase did not increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, but early stoppage of the study prevents definitive conclusions from being drawn.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04454788.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Within 24 Hours of Symptom Onset: The ETERNAL-LVO Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Vignan Yogendrakumar, Bruce C V Campbell, Leonid Churilov, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Philip M C Choi, Dennis J Cordato, Niruta Dhimal, Liudmyla Olenko, Prodipta Guha, Gagan Sharma, Chushuang Chen, Amy McDonald, Vincent Thijs, Abul Mamun, Angela Dos Santos, Anna H Balabanski, Timothy J Kleinig, Ken S Butcher, Michael J Devlin, Fintan O'Rourke, Geoffrey A Donnan, Stephen M Davis, Christopher R Levi, Henry Ma, Mark W Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset with a large vessel occlusion and target mismatch on perfusion computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ETERNAL-LVO was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, phase 3, superiority trial where adult participants with a large vessel occlusion, presenting within 24 hours of onset with salvageable tissue on computed tomography perfusion, were randomized to tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or standard care across 11 primary and comprehensive stroke centers in Australia. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 or return to baseline at 90 days via a modified Poisson regression model. Secondary outcomes include the modified Rankin Scale, considered as an ordinal variable, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following trial initiation, a supply shortage of the investigational product hindered recruitment. When supply resumed, phase 3 evidence had emerged supporting tenecteplase use within 4.5 hours of stroke onset, including large vessel occlusion. ETERNAL-LVO was, therefore, terminated early. Two hundred forty-two participants (median age: 73 years, 43% female, 79% undergoing EVT) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis; 120 received tenecteplase and 122 received standard care. No difference in the primary outcome was observed between the tenecteplase (n=44, 37%) and standard care (n=52, 43%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.66-1.21]; <i>P</i>=0.48). No significant differences in an ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale were observed between the 2 treatment groups. In a planned per-protocol analysis, the odds of improvement by 1 point in the modified Rankin Scale were doubled in the tenecteplase-treated transfer subgroup compared with standard care transfer patients (odds ratio, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.07-6.40]). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5 (4%) participants assigned to tenecteplase and was present in 1 (1%) participant assigned to standard care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with tenecteplase did not increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, but early stoppage of the study prevents definitive conclusions from being drawn.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04454788.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052511\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估替奈普酶在症状发作24小时内出现大血管闭塞和灌注计算机断层扫描靶位不匹配的患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:ETERNAL-LVO是一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲法终点的3期优势试验,在澳大利亚的11个初级和综合卒中中心,成年大血管闭塞患者在发病24小时内出现计算机断层扫描灌注可恢复组织,随机接受0.25 mg/kg的tenecteplase或标准治疗。主要结局是修改后的Rankin量表评分为0到1,或通过修改后的泊松回归模型在90天恢复到基线。次要结局包括修改后的Rankin量表(被认为是一个顺序变量)和症状性脑出血。结果:在试验开始后,研究产品的供应短缺阻碍了招募。当供应恢复时,iii期证据已经出现,支持在中风发作4.5小时内使用tenecteplase,包括大血管闭塞。因此,ETERNAL-LVO被提前终止。242名参与者(中位年龄:73岁,43%为女性,79%接受EVT)被纳入改进的意向治疗分析;120人接受替奈普,122人接受标准治疗。tenecteplase组(n=44, 37%)和标准治疗组(n=52, 43%;校正风险比为0.90 [95% CI, 0.66-1.21]; P=0.48)的主要结局无差异。改良Rankin量表的顺序分析在两个治疗组间无显著差异。在一项计划的方案分析中,在改良的Rankin量表中,tenecte酶治疗的转移亚组与标准治疗的转移患者相比,改善1点的几率增加了一倍(优势比为2.61 [95% CI, 1.07-6.40])。5名(4%)接受替奈普酶治疗的患者出现症状性脑出血,1名(1%)接受标准治疗的患者出现症状性脑出血。结论:用tenecteplase治疗并没有增加良好功能结果的可能性,但早期停止研究阻止了得出明确的结论。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT04454788。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Tenecteplase in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Within 24 Hours of Symptom Onset: The ETERNAL-LVO Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset with a large vessel occlusion and target mismatch on perfusion computed tomography.

Methods: ETERNAL-LVO was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, phase 3, superiority trial where adult participants with a large vessel occlusion, presenting within 24 hours of onset with salvageable tissue on computed tomography perfusion, were randomized to tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or standard care across 11 primary and comprehensive stroke centers in Australia. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 or return to baseline at 90 days via a modified Poisson regression model. Secondary outcomes include the modified Rankin Scale, considered as an ordinal variable, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.

Results: Following trial initiation, a supply shortage of the investigational product hindered recruitment. When supply resumed, phase 3 evidence had emerged supporting tenecteplase use within 4.5 hours of stroke onset, including large vessel occlusion. ETERNAL-LVO was, therefore, terminated early. Two hundred forty-two participants (median age: 73 years, 43% female, 79% undergoing EVT) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis; 120 received tenecteplase and 122 received standard care. No difference in the primary outcome was observed between the tenecteplase (n=44, 37%) and standard care (n=52, 43%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.66-1.21]; P=0.48). No significant differences in an ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale were observed between the 2 treatment groups. In a planned per-protocol analysis, the odds of improvement by 1 point in the modified Rankin Scale were doubled in the tenecteplase-treated transfer subgroup compared with standard care transfer patients (odds ratio, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.07-6.40]). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5 (4%) participants assigned to tenecteplase and was present in 1 (1%) participant assigned to standard care.

Conclusions: Treatment with tenecteplase did not increase the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, but early stoppage of the study prevents definitive conclusions from being drawn.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04454788.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信