水淹树木气孔导度的水力约束。

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Marisa J Brennan, Kristopher S Criscione, Jacob A Olichney, Junyan Ding, Yilin Fang, Nate McDowell, Brett T Wolfe
{"title":"水淹树木气孔导度的水力约束。","authors":"Marisa J Brennan, Kristopher S Criscione, Jacob A Olichney, Junyan Ding, Yilin Fang, Nate McDowell, Brett T Wolfe","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05789-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stomatal closure is a pervasive response among trees exposed to flooded soil. We tested whether this response is caused by reduced hydraulic conductance in the soil-to-leaf hydraulic continuum (k<sub>total</sub>), and particularly by reduced root hydraulic conductance (k<sub>root</sub>), which has been widely hypothesized. We tracked stomatal conductance at the leaf level (g<sub>s</sub>) and canopy scale (G<sub>s</sub>) along with physiological conditions in two temperate tree species, Magnolia grandiflora and Quercus virginiana, that were subjected to flood and control conditions in a greenhouse experiment. Flooding reduced g<sub>s</sub>, G<sub>s</sub>, k<sub>root</sub> and k<sub>total</sub>. Path analysis showed strong support for direct effects of k<sub>total</sub> on g<sub>s</sub> and for flood duration on k<sub>total</sub>, but not k<sub>root</sub> on k<sub>total</sub>. A process-based model that accounted for the k<sub>total</sub> reduction predicted the timeseries of G<sub>s</sub> in flood and control treatment trees reasonably well (predicted versus observed G<sub>s</sub> R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80 and 0.51 for M. grandiflora and Q. virginiana, respectively). However, accounting only for k<sub>root</sub> reduction in flooded trees was insufficient for predicting observed G<sub>s</sub> reduction. Together, these results suggest that hydraulic constraints were not limited to roots and highlight the need to account for flooding effects on k<sub>total</sub> when projecting forest ecosystem function using process-based models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 10","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydraulic constraints to stomatal conductance in flooded trees.\",\"authors\":\"Marisa J Brennan, Kristopher S Criscione, Jacob A Olichney, Junyan Ding, Yilin Fang, Nate McDowell, Brett T Wolfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00442-025-05789-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stomatal closure is a pervasive response among trees exposed to flooded soil. We tested whether this response is caused by reduced hydraulic conductance in the soil-to-leaf hydraulic continuum (k<sub>total</sub>), and particularly by reduced root hydraulic conductance (k<sub>root</sub>), which has been widely hypothesized. We tracked stomatal conductance at the leaf level (g<sub>s</sub>) and canopy scale (G<sub>s</sub>) along with physiological conditions in two temperate tree species, Magnolia grandiflora and Quercus virginiana, that were subjected to flood and control conditions in a greenhouse experiment. Flooding reduced g<sub>s</sub>, G<sub>s</sub>, k<sub>root</sub> and k<sub>total</sub>. Path analysis showed strong support for direct effects of k<sub>total</sub> on g<sub>s</sub> and for flood duration on k<sub>total</sub>, but not k<sub>root</sub> on k<sub>total</sub>. A process-based model that accounted for the k<sub>total</sub> reduction predicted the timeseries of G<sub>s</sub> in flood and control treatment trees reasonably well (predicted versus observed G<sub>s</sub> R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80 and 0.51 for M. grandiflora and Q. virginiana, respectively). However, accounting only for k<sub>root</sub> reduction in flooded trees was insufficient for predicting observed G<sub>s</sub> reduction. Together, these results suggest that hydraulic constraints were not limited to roots and highlight the need to account for flooding effects on k<sub>total</sub> when projecting forest ecosystem function using process-based models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecologia\",\"volume\":\"207 10\",\"pages\":\"154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423221/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05789-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05789-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气孔关闭是树木暴露在淹水土壤中的普遍反应。我们测试了这种反应是否是由土壤-叶片水力连续体(ktotal)中的水力导度降低引起的,特别是由根水力导度降低引起的(kroot),这已经被广泛假设。在大棚试验中,对两种温带树种广玉兰(Magnolia grandflora)和维吉尼亚栎(Quercus virginiana)在洪水和控制条件下的叶片和冠层尺度气孔导度及其生理状况进行了跟踪研究。洪水降低了gs、gs、kroot和ktotal。通径分析表明,ktotal对gs和洪水持续时间有直接影响,而kroot对ktotal没有直接影响。一个基于过程的模型可以很好地预测洪水和控制处理树的Gs时间序列(预测与观测的Gs R2分别为0.80和0.51)。然而,仅考虑淹水树木的根减少不足以预测观测到的Gs减少。总之,这些结果表明,水力约束并不局限于根系,并强调在使用基于过程的模型预测森林生态系统功能时,需要考虑洪水对ktotal的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hydraulic constraints to stomatal conductance in flooded trees.

Hydraulic constraints to stomatal conductance in flooded trees.

Hydraulic constraints to stomatal conductance in flooded trees.

Hydraulic constraints to stomatal conductance in flooded trees.

Stomatal closure is a pervasive response among trees exposed to flooded soil. We tested whether this response is caused by reduced hydraulic conductance in the soil-to-leaf hydraulic continuum (ktotal), and particularly by reduced root hydraulic conductance (kroot), which has been widely hypothesized. We tracked stomatal conductance at the leaf level (gs) and canopy scale (Gs) along with physiological conditions in two temperate tree species, Magnolia grandiflora and Quercus virginiana, that were subjected to flood and control conditions in a greenhouse experiment. Flooding reduced gs, Gs, kroot and ktotal. Path analysis showed strong support for direct effects of ktotal on gs and for flood duration on ktotal, but not kroot on ktotal. A process-based model that accounted for the ktotal reduction predicted the timeseries of Gs in flood and control treatment trees reasonably well (predicted versus observed Gs R2 = 0.80 and 0.51 for M. grandiflora and Q. virginiana, respectively). However, accounting only for kroot reduction in flooded trees was insufficient for predicting observed Gs reduction. Together, these results suggest that hydraulic constraints were not limited to roots and highlight the need to account for flooding effects on ktotal when projecting forest ecosystem function using process-based models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信