植物-昆虫食草动物军备竞赛的生物力学组成部分:切叶蚁的模型测试。

IF 3.5 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Journal of The Royal Society Interface Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-10 DOI:10.1098/rsif.2025.0091
Olivia K Walthaus, Dilanka I Deegala, Raphael Delattre, David Labonte
{"title":"植物-昆虫食草动物军备竞赛的生物力学组成部分:切叶蚁的模型测试。","authors":"Olivia K Walthaus, Dilanka I Deegala, Raphael Delattre, David Labonte","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2025.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insects and plants have been locked in an evolutionary arms race spanning 350 million years. Insects evolved specialized tools to cut into plant tissue, and plants, to counter these attacks, developed diverse defence strategies. Much previous worked has focused on chemical defences. How can plants vary their mechanical properties to deter herbivores, and how can insects respond? We test a simple mechanical model that relates the force required to cut thin, leaf-like tissues to their mechanical properties and the geometry of the cutting tool. To remove the confounding effects of tool shape across size, we use leaf-cutter ant mandibles as a model system. Cutting forces were measured for pristine and worn mandibles that vary by one order of magnitude in size, using a custom-built fibre-optic set-up and homogeneous pseudoleaves as well as a set of plant tissues as model substrates. The results substantially support the model, enabling quantitative predictions. Fracture toughness is identified as a key mechanical defence trait for plants, cutting edge radius as the critical geometric property of the insect mandible and cutting edge wear consequently emerges as a key modulator of cutting forces, elevating it up to fivefold above a physical minimum. Thus, plants may be served by implementing strategies that maximize wear, whereas insects should seek to minimize it.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"22 230","pages":"20250091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical components of the plant-insect herbivore arms race: a model test in leaf-cutter ants.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia K Walthaus, Dilanka I Deegala, Raphael Delattre, David Labonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsif.2025.0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Insects and plants have been locked in an evolutionary arms race spanning 350 million years. Insects evolved specialized tools to cut into plant tissue, and plants, to counter these attacks, developed diverse defence strategies. Much previous worked has focused on chemical defences. How can plants vary their mechanical properties to deter herbivores, and how can insects respond? We test a simple mechanical model that relates the force required to cut thin, leaf-like tissues to their mechanical properties and the geometry of the cutting tool. To remove the confounding effects of tool shape across size, we use leaf-cutter ant mandibles as a model system. Cutting forces were measured for pristine and worn mandibles that vary by one order of magnitude in size, using a custom-built fibre-optic set-up and homogeneous pseudoleaves as well as a set of plant tissues as model substrates. The results substantially support the model, enabling quantitative predictions. Fracture toughness is identified as a key mechanical defence trait for plants, cutting edge radius as the critical geometric property of the insect mandible and cutting edge wear consequently emerges as a key modulator of cutting forces, elevating it up to fivefold above a physical minimum. Thus, plants may be served by implementing strategies that maximize wear, whereas insects should seek to minimize it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Royal Society Interface\",\"volume\":\"22 230\",\"pages\":\"20250091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419890/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Royal Society Interface\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2025.0091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2025.0091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

昆虫和植物已经陷入了一场长达3.5亿年的进化军备竞赛。昆虫进化出了专门的工具来切入植物组织,而植物为了对抗这些攻击,发展出了各种各样的防御策略。之前的很多工作都集中在化学防御上。植物是如何改变它们的机械特性来阻止食草动物的?昆虫又是如何做出反应的?我们测试了一个简单的机械模型,该模型将切割薄的叶状组织所需的力与它们的机械性能和切割工具的几何形状联系起来。为了消除工具形状在大小上的混淆效应,我们使用切叶蚁下颌骨作为模型系统。使用定制的光纤装置和均匀的假叶以及一组植物组织作为模型基质,测量原始和磨损的下颌骨的切削力,其大小变化为一个数量级。结果基本上支持该模型,使定量预测成为可能。断裂韧性被认为是植物的关键机械防御特性,切削刃半径是昆虫下颌骨的关键几何特性,因此切削刃磨损成为切削力的关键调节器,将其提升到物理最小值的五倍以上。因此,植物可以通过实施最大化磨损的策略来服务,而昆虫应该寻求最小化磨损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical components of the plant-insect herbivore arms race: a model test in leaf-cutter ants.

Insects and plants have been locked in an evolutionary arms race spanning 350 million years. Insects evolved specialized tools to cut into plant tissue, and plants, to counter these attacks, developed diverse defence strategies. Much previous worked has focused on chemical defences. How can plants vary their mechanical properties to deter herbivores, and how can insects respond? We test a simple mechanical model that relates the force required to cut thin, leaf-like tissues to their mechanical properties and the geometry of the cutting tool. To remove the confounding effects of tool shape across size, we use leaf-cutter ant mandibles as a model system. Cutting forces were measured for pristine and worn mandibles that vary by one order of magnitude in size, using a custom-built fibre-optic set-up and homogeneous pseudoleaves as well as a set of plant tissues as model substrates. The results substantially support the model, enabling quantitative predictions. Fracture toughness is identified as a key mechanical defence trait for plants, cutting edge radius as the critical geometric property of the insect mandible and cutting edge wear consequently emerges as a key modulator of cutting forces, elevating it up to fivefold above a physical minimum. Thus, plants may be served by implementing strategies that maximize wear, whereas insects should seek to minimize it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Journal of The Royal Society Interface 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信