时间光谱复用数据中荧光团快速分析的相量和神经网络方法。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Biomedical Optics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1117/1.JBO.30.9.095001
Jonas Rottmann, Alexander Netaev, Nicolas Schierbaum, Manuel Ligges, Karsten Seidl
{"title":"时间光谱复用数据中荧光团快速分析的相量和神经网络方法。","authors":"Jonas Rottmann, Alexander Netaev, Nicolas Schierbaum, Manuel Ligges, Karsten Seidl","doi":"10.1117/1.JBO.30.9.095001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>The spatial and temporal distribution of fluorophore fractions in biological and environmental systems contains valuable information about the interactions and dynamics of these systems. To access this information, fluorophore fractions are commonly determined by means of their fluorescence emission spectrum (ES) or lifetime (LT). Combining both dimensions in temporal-spectral multiplexed data enables more accurate fraction determination while requiring advanced and fast analysis methods to handle the increased data complexity and size.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We introduce two methods, a phasor and a feedforward neural network (FNN) analysis, to extract fluorophore fractions from temporal-spectral data. These methods aim to handle the increased data complexity and size of temporal-spectral multiplexed data and therefore enable access to a more accurate and fast fraction determination.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>The phasor analysis determines the fraction in each dimension and combines them, whereas the FNN is trained using artificially mixed data. Both methods are compared with the reference method using linear combination-based curve fitting (FIT). The methods are tested in a two-component scenario of exogenous fluorophores with different ES and LT and in a three-component scenario of endogenous fluorophores with similar ES and different LT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this case, the phasor analysis showed the lowest absolute errors in the fraction determination (1.4% two-component, 4.7% three-component), outperforming the FNN (6.3%) and FIT (8.7%) analysis, which are both not able to recognize all fluorophores in the three-component scenario. The computational effort was reduced by roughly a factor of 6 (Phasor/FNN) compared with FIT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both methods demonstrate substantial advantages over common fitting, offering a faster and more accurate determination of fluorophore fractions. These advancements make temporal-spectral multiplexed data more accessible and practical, particularly for high-speed applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","volume":"30 9","pages":"095001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phasor and neural network approaches for rapid fluorophore fraction analysis in temporal-spectral multiplexed data.\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Rottmann, Alexander Netaev, Nicolas Schierbaum, Manuel Ligges, Karsten Seidl\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JBO.30.9.095001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>The spatial and temporal distribution of fluorophore fractions in biological and environmental systems contains valuable information about the interactions and dynamics of these systems. To access this information, fluorophore fractions are commonly determined by means of their fluorescence emission spectrum (ES) or lifetime (LT). Combining both dimensions in temporal-spectral multiplexed data enables more accurate fraction determination while requiring advanced and fast analysis methods to handle the increased data complexity and size.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We introduce two methods, a phasor and a feedforward neural network (FNN) analysis, to extract fluorophore fractions from temporal-spectral data. These methods aim to handle the increased data complexity and size of temporal-spectral multiplexed data and therefore enable access to a more accurate and fast fraction determination.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>The phasor analysis determines the fraction in each dimension and combines them, whereas the FNN is trained using artificially mixed data. Both methods are compared with the reference method using linear combination-based curve fitting (FIT). The methods are tested in a two-component scenario of exogenous fluorophores with different ES and LT and in a three-component scenario of endogenous fluorophores with similar ES and different LT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this case, the phasor analysis showed the lowest absolute errors in the fraction determination (1.4% two-component, 4.7% three-component), outperforming the FNN (6.3%) and FIT (8.7%) analysis, which are both not able to recognize all fluorophores in the three-component scenario. The computational effort was reduced by roughly a factor of 6 (Phasor/FNN) compared with FIT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both methods demonstrate substantial advantages over common fitting, offering a faster and more accurate determination of fluorophore fractions. These advancements make temporal-spectral multiplexed data more accessible and practical, particularly for high-speed applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Optics\",\"volume\":\"30 9\",\"pages\":\"095001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417092/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.30.9.095001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.30.9.095001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义:荧光团在生物和环境系统中的时空分布包含了这些系统相互作用和动力学的宝贵信息。为了获得这些信息,荧光团组分通常通过其荧光发射光谱(ES)或寿命(LT)来确定。结合时间光谱多路复用数据的两个维度可以更准确地确定分数,同时需要先进和快速的分析方法来处理增加的数据复杂性和大小。目的:采用相量分析和前馈神经网络(FNN)分析两种方法从时间光谱数据中提取荧光团。这些方法旨在处理增加的数据复杂性和时间谱复用数据的大小,从而能够获得更准确和快速的分数测定。方法:相量分析确定每个维度的分数并将它们组合起来,而FNN是使用人工混合数据训练的。将两种方法与基于线性组合的曲线拟合(FIT)的参考方法进行比较。在具有不同ES和LT的外源荧光团的双组分场景和具有相似ES和LT的内源荧光团的三组分场景中,对这些方法进行了测试。结果:在这种情况下,相量分析显示分数测定的绝对误差最低(双组分1.4%,三组分4.7%),优于FNN(6.3%)和FIT(8.7%)分析,两者都不能识别三组分场景中的所有荧光团。与FIT相比,计算工作量减少了大约6倍(相量/FNN)。结论:两种方法都比普通拟合具有明显的优势,可提供更快、更准确的荧光团组分测定。这些进步使时谱多路复用数据更容易获取和实用,特别是在高速应用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Phasor and neural network approaches for rapid fluorophore fraction analysis in temporal-spectral multiplexed data.

Phasor and neural network approaches for rapid fluorophore fraction analysis in temporal-spectral multiplexed data.

Phasor and neural network approaches for rapid fluorophore fraction analysis in temporal-spectral multiplexed data.

Phasor and neural network approaches for rapid fluorophore fraction analysis in temporal-spectral multiplexed data.

Significance: The spatial and temporal distribution of fluorophore fractions in biological and environmental systems contains valuable information about the interactions and dynamics of these systems. To access this information, fluorophore fractions are commonly determined by means of their fluorescence emission spectrum (ES) or lifetime (LT). Combining both dimensions in temporal-spectral multiplexed data enables more accurate fraction determination while requiring advanced and fast analysis methods to handle the increased data complexity and size.

Aim: We introduce two methods, a phasor and a feedforward neural network (FNN) analysis, to extract fluorophore fractions from temporal-spectral data. These methods aim to handle the increased data complexity and size of temporal-spectral multiplexed data and therefore enable access to a more accurate and fast fraction determination.

Approach: The phasor analysis determines the fraction in each dimension and combines them, whereas the FNN is trained using artificially mixed data. Both methods are compared with the reference method using linear combination-based curve fitting (FIT). The methods are tested in a two-component scenario of exogenous fluorophores with different ES and LT and in a three-component scenario of endogenous fluorophores with similar ES and different LT.

Results: In this case, the phasor analysis showed the lowest absolute errors in the fraction determination (1.4% two-component, 4.7% three-component), outperforming the FNN (6.3%) and FIT (8.7%) analysis, which are both not able to recognize all fluorophores in the three-component scenario. The computational effort was reduced by roughly a factor of 6 (Phasor/FNN) compared with FIT.

Conclusions: Both methods demonstrate substantial advantages over common fitting, offering a faster and more accurate determination of fluorophore fractions. These advancements make temporal-spectral multiplexed data more accessible and practical, particularly for high-speed applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
263
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Optics publishes peer-reviewed papers on the use of modern optical technology for improved health care and biomedical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信