Elena Solfaroli Camillocci, Davide Ciucci, Claudia Polito, Salvatore Donatiello, Antonio Napolitano, Damiano Palmieri, Luigi Rinaldi, Andrea Apollonio, Maria Felicia Villani, Milena Pizzoferro, Claudio Altini, Maria Carmen Garganese, Vittorio Cannatà
{"title":"优化肾小球滤过率估算:一种提高准确性和效率的简化方法。","authors":"Elena Solfaroli Camillocci, Davide Ciucci, Claudia Polito, Salvatore Donatiello, Antonio Napolitano, Damiano Palmieri, Luigi Rinaldi, Andrea Apollonio, Maria Felicia Villani, Milena Pizzoferro, Claudio Altini, Maria Carmen Garganese, Vittorio Cannatà","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.125.270100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a key measure of renal function, typically estimated using creatinine-based equations. More precise clearance measurements are obtained with radiotracers, such as [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), and blood samples over several hours. However, standard plasma clearance methods require labor-intensive plasma preparation, limiting efficiency in clinical practice. This study proposes a simplified approach to GFR estimation by directly measuring radioactivity in whole blood and applying a correction factor based on hematocrit, eliminating the need for blood centrifugation and reducing calibration steps. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty-seven adults and children undergoing GFR assessment with [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-DTPA were included in the study. GFR was estimated using both the standard plasma-based method and a whole-blood approach, which directly measured radioactivity in whole blood and applied a correction factor based on hematocrit. The γ-counter's response linearity and reproducibility were assessed to validate the correction factor. Comparisons between plasma-based and whole blood-derived GFRs were performed using linear regression and deviation analysis. <b>Results:</b> The γ-counter demonstrated a detection efficiency of 50.5% in the activity range of 30-150 kBq, confirming its reliability for whole-blood measurements. The proposed whole-blood method yielded GFRs that were highly correlated with the plasma-based approach, with an average deviation of 4%. Significant deviations (>15%) were observed in only 2 of 67 cases. The whole-blood method eliminated the need for plasma separation, reduced processing time, and maintained measurement accuracy. <b>Conclusion:</b> The proposed whole-blood approach provides a reliable alternative to standard plasma-based GFR estimation, simplifying sample preparation and reducing clinical workload. This method enhances efficiency in nuclear medicine while preserving measurement accuracy, making it a viable option for routine renal function assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation: A Simplified Method for Improved Accuracy and Efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Solfaroli Camillocci, Davide Ciucci, Claudia Polito, Salvatore Donatiello, Antonio Napolitano, Damiano Palmieri, Luigi Rinaldi, Andrea Apollonio, Maria Felicia Villani, Milena Pizzoferro, Claudio Altini, Maria Carmen Garganese, Vittorio Cannatà\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnmt.125.270100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a key measure of renal function, typically estimated using creatinine-based equations. More precise clearance measurements are obtained with radiotracers, such as [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), and blood samples over several hours. However, standard plasma clearance methods require labor-intensive plasma preparation, limiting efficiency in clinical practice. This study proposes a simplified approach to GFR estimation by directly measuring radioactivity in whole blood and applying a correction factor based on hematocrit, eliminating the need for blood centrifugation and reducing calibration steps. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty-seven adults and children undergoing GFR assessment with [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-DTPA were included in the study. GFR was estimated using both the standard plasma-based method and a whole-blood approach, which directly measured radioactivity in whole blood and applied a correction factor based on hematocrit. The γ-counter's response linearity and reproducibility were assessed to validate the correction factor. Comparisons between plasma-based and whole blood-derived GFRs were performed using linear regression and deviation analysis. <b>Results:</b> The γ-counter demonstrated a detection efficiency of 50.5% in the activity range of 30-150 kBq, confirming its reliability for whole-blood measurements. The proposed whole-blood method yielded GFRs that were highly correlated with the plasma-based approach, with an average deviation of 4%. Significant deviations (>15%) were observed in only 2 of 67 cases. The whole-blood method eliminated the need for plasma separation, reduced processing time, and maintained measurement accuracy. <b>Conclusion:</b> The proposed whole-blood approach provides a reliable alternative to standard plasma-based GFR estimation, simplifying sample preparation and reducing clinical workload. This method enhances efficiency in nuclear medicine while preserving measurement accuracy, making it a viable option for routine renal function assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.270100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.270100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation: A Simplified Method for Improved Accuracy and Efficiency.
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a key measure of renal function, typically estimated using creatinine-based equations. More precise clearance measurements are obtained with radiotracers, such as [99mTc]Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), and blood samples over several hours. However, standard plasma clearance methods require labor-intensive plasma preparation, limiting efficiency in clinical practice. This study proposes a simplified approach to GFR estimation by directly measuring radioactivity in whole blood and applying a correction factor based on hematocrit, eliminating the need for blood centrifugation and reducing calibration steps. Methods: Sixty-seven adults and children undergoing GFR assessment with [99mTc]Tc-DTPA were included in the study. GFR was estimated using both the standard plasma-based method and a whole-blood approach, which directly measured radioactivity in whole blood and applied a correction factor based on hematocrit. The γ-counter's response linearity and reproducibility were assessed to validate the correction factor. Comparisons between plasma-based and whole blood-derived GFRs were performed using linear regression and deviation analysis. Results: The γ-counter demonstrated a detection efficiency of 50.5% in the activity range of 30-150 kBq, confirming its reliability for whole-blood measurements. The proposed whole-blood method yielded GFRs that were highly correlated with the plasma-based approach, with an average deviation of 4%. Significant deviations (>15%) were observed in only 2 of 67 cases. The whole-blood method eliminated the need for plasma separation, reduced processing time, and maintained measurement accuracy. Conclusion: The proposed whole-blood approach provides a reliable alternative to standard plasma-based GFR estimation, simplifying sample preparation and reducing clinical workload. This method enhances efficiency in nuclear medicine while preserving measurement accuracy, making it a viable option for routine renal function assessment.