Chang Yanan, Liu Ting, Cao Wei Li, Xu Yaxin, Chen Hong
{"title":"术中腹腔热化疗加手术治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Chang Yanan, Liu Ting, Cao Wei Li, Xu Yaxin, Chen Hong","doi":"10.1177/03000605251372415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p<i> < </i>0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p<i> < </i>0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 9","pages":"3000605251372415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Chang Yanan, Liu Ting, Cao Wei Li, Xu Yaxin, Chen Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03000605251372415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p<i> < </i>0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p<i> < </i>0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"53 9\",\"pages\":\"3000605251372415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251372415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251372415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p < 0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p < 0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.
期刊介绍:
_Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis.
As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible.
Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence.
Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements.
Print ISSN: 0300-0605