术中腹腔热化疗加手术治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效和安全性。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI:10.1177/03000605251372415
Chang Yanan, Liu Ting, Cao Wei Li, Xu Yaxin, Chen Hong
{"title":"术中腹腔热化疗加手术治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Chang Yanan, Liu Ting, Cao Wei Li, Xu Yaxin, Chen Hong","doi":"10.1177/03000605251372415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p<i> < </i>0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p<i> < </i>0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 9","pages":"3000605251372415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Chang Yanan, Liu Ting, Cao Wei Li, Xu Yaxin, Chen Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03000605251372415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p<i> < </i>0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p<i> < </i>0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"53 9\",\"pages\":\"3000605251372415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421004/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251372415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251372415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价术中腹腔热疗化疗(HIPEC)治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性研究200例晚期卵巢癌患者,随机分为两组(研究登记号:11353)。关闭腹部后第一天,非HIPEC组进行常规治疗,HIPEC组进行HIPEC治疗。比较两组患者的手术结局、总生存期、无进展生存期、副作用、生活质量,分析影响总生存期和无进展生存期的危险因素。结果两组患者基本情况差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组患者手术至首次排气时间、术后住院时间、腹痛、出血、渗漏等血液指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05);然而,非hipec组出现肠梗阻和盆腔脓肿的症状更频繁(p < 0.05)。HIPEC、肿瘤大小、N分期、T分期、血管浸润为显著指标,HIPEC、肿瘤大小、血管浸润、N分期、T分期为独立预后因素。HIPEC组3年生存率(42%)高于非HIPEC组(21%)(p < 0.001)。HIPEC组的无进展生存曲线优于非HIPEC组(p 0.001), HIPEC组的复发率(25%)低于非HIPEC组(49%)(p 0.001)。结论HIPEC组可减少肠梗阻、盆腔脓肿等围手术期并发症的发生,总生存曲线和无进展生存曲线均优于HIPEC组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p < 0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p < 0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信