验证水烟成瘾,渴望,和预期量表:探索性因素分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Sandrella Bou Malhab, Hala Sacre, Chadia Haddad, Pierre Khalifeh, Elissa Daher, Pascale Salameh
{"title":"验证水烟成瘾,渴望,和预期量表:探索性因素分析。","authors":"Sandrella Bou Malhab, Hala Sacre, Chadia Haddad, Pierre Khalifeh, Elissa Daher, Pascale Salameh","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Waterpipe smoking is increasingly becoming a public health threat due to its appealing features and misperceptions of its harmful effects. Tools assessing waterpipe addiction are essential for understanding waterpipe smokers' behaviors and designing effective smoking cessation plans. This study aimed to develop and validate the Waterpipe Addiction, Craving, and Anticipation Scale (WACAS) and describe the specific patterns and multidimensional aspects of waterpipe smoking behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted to develop the WACAS based on previously published smoking assessment tools. Snowball sampling was used to recruit 107 waterpipe smokers. Several procedures were performed to examine the scale's validity, including construct and convergent validity. Known-group validity was examined using trend analysis, while path analysis was conducted to confirm the theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WACAS showed high construct validity (generating 6 factors) and internal consistency, with excellent convergent and known-group validity. It could distinguish between various behavioral expressions of waterpipe smoking, that is, addiction, craving, and anticipation of smoking outcomes, which were initially conceptualized in the theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WACAS developed in this study is a comprehensive scale comprising 6 factors that distinguish between different behavioral expressions among waterpipe smokers. It captures a unique waterpipe-specific mode of craving explained by anticipation of outcomes and addictive behaviors, confirming the theoretical framework. The scale demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Nevertheless, further refinement and external validation are recommended to establish WACAS as a robust tool for a broad-scope evaluation of waterpipe smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the Waterpipe Addiction, Craving, and Anticipation Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sandrella Bou Malhab, Hala Sacre, Chadia Haddad, Pierre Khalifeh, Elissa Daher, Pascale Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Waterpipe smoking is increasingly becoming a public health threat due to its appealing features and misperceptions of its harmful effects. Tools assessing waterpipe addiction are essential for understanding waterpipe smokers' behaviors and designing effective smoking cessation plans. This study aimed to develop and validate the Waterpipe Addiction, Craving, and Anticipation Scale (WACAS) and describe the specific patterns and multidimensional aspects of waterpipe smoking behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted to develop the WACAS based on previously published smoking assessment tools. Snowball sampling was used to recruit 107 waterpipe smokers. Several procedures were performed to examine the scale's validity, including construct and convergent validity. Known-group validity was examined using trend analysis, while path analysis was conducted to confirm the theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WACAS showed high construct validity (generating 6 factors) and internal consistency, with excellent convergent and known-group validity. It could distinguish between various behavioral expressions of waterpipe smoking, that is, addiction, craving, and anticipation of smoking outcomes, which were initially conceptualized in the theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WACAS developed in this study is a comprehensive scale comprising 6 factors that distinguish between different behavioral expressions among waterpipe smokers. It captures a unique waterpipe-specific mode of craving explained by anticipation of outcomes and addictive behaviors, confirming the theoretical framework. The scale demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Nevertheless, further refinement and external validation are recommended to establish WACAS as a robust tool for a broad-scope evaluation of waterpipe smoking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001577\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:水烟因其吸引人的特点和对其有害影响的误解而日益成为公共健康威胁。评估水烟成瘾的工具对于理解水烟吸烟者的行为和设计有效的戒烟计划是必不可少的。本研究旨在开发和验证水烟成瘾、渴望和预期量表(WACAS),并描述水烟吸烟行为的具体模式和多维方面。方法:采用一项横断面研究,在先前发表的吸烟评估工具的基础上开发WACAS。采用滚雪球抽样方法招募了107名水烟吸烟者。本研究采用数种方法来检验量表的效度,包括建构效度和收敛效度。采用趋势分析检验已知组效度,采用通径分析验证理论框架。结果:WACAS具有较高的构念效度(产生6个因子)和内部一致性,具有良好的收敛效度和已知组效度。它可以区分水烟吸烟的各种行为表达,即成瘾、渴望和对吸烟结果的预期,这些在理论框架中是最初概念化的。结论:本研究开发的WACAS是一个包含6个因素的综合量表,可以区分水烟吸烟者的不同行为表现。它捕捉到了一种独特的、由预期结果和成瘾行为解释的、特定于水管的渴望模式,证实了理论框架。量表具有较强的效度和信度。然而,建议进一步完善和外部验证,以建立WACAS作为广泛评估水烟吸烟的强大工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating the Waterpipe Addiction, Craving, and Anticipation Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis.

Objectives: Waterpipe smoking is increasingly becoming a public health threat due to its appealing features and misperceptions of its harmful effects. Tools assessing waterpipe addiction are essential for understanding waterpipe smokers' behaviors and designing effective smoking cessation plans. This study aimed to develop and validate the Waterpipe Addiction, Craving, and Anticipation Scale (WACAS) and describe the specific patterns and multidimensional aspects of waterpipe smoking behavior.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to develop the WACAS based on previously published smoking assessment tools. Snowball sampling was used to recruit 107 waterpipe smokers. Several procedures were performed to examine the scale's validity, including construct and convergent validity. Known-group validity was examined using trend analysis, while path analysis was conducted to confirm the theoretical framework.

Results: The WACAS showed high construct validity (generating 6 factors) and internal consistency, with excellent convergent and known-group validity. It could distinguish between various behavioral expressions of waterpipe smoking, that is, addiction, craving, and anticipation of smoking outcomes, which were initially conceptualized in the theoretical framework.

Conclusions: The WACAS developed in this study is a comprehensive scale comprising 6 factors that distinguish between different behavioral expressions among waterpipe smokers. It captures a unique waterpipe-specific mode of craving explained by anticipation of outcomes and addictive behaviors, confirming the theoretical framework. The scale demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Nevertheless, further refinement and external validation are recommended to establish WACAS as a robust tool for a broad-scope evaluation of waterpipe smoking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信