{"title":"β-受体阻滞剂与心肌梗死后患者的临床结局:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenxing Yang, Xuehong Sun, Yushu Zhang, Zhi Lu, Zhilong Shu, Kui Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00228-025-03919-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>While current clinical guidelines generally advocate for beta-blocker therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), conflicting findings have surfaced through large-scale observational studies and meta-analyses. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational studies to quantify the long-term therapeutic impact of beta-blocker across heterogeneous AMI populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2000 to 2025 that examine the link between beta-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes (last search update: March 1, 2025). We used the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to evaluate the effect of beta-blocker therapy on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, or major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in AMI patients. Our analysis stratified these effects by study type, ejection fraction (EF), sample size, follow-up duration, and patient characteristics including primary coronary revascularization, ST-segment elevation status, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis incorporated 34 observational studies covering 233,303 AMI patients. Our results showed beta-blockers reduced all-cause (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82) and cardiac mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.89) in post-AMI patients, with no significant effect on MACE. In these patients, post-PCI and STEMI patients, beta-blockers lowered all-cause mortality but not MACE risk. Subgroup analysis revealed that beta-blockers decreased all-cause death in post-AMI patients with diabetes and COPD, but not in those with hypertension and AF. Stratified by EF, beta-blockers were beneficial for all-cause death (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.93), cardiac death (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.92), and MACE (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.96) in post-AMI patients with reduced EF and only decreased all-cause death in those with preserved EF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis suggests beta-blockers may offer long-term clinical benefits to AMI patients, particularly those with reduced EF. However, this is not conclusive for AMI patients with comorbidities or preserved EF.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"β-blocker and clinical outcomes in patients after myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wenxing Yang, Xuehong Sun, Yushu Zhang, Zhi Lu, Zhilong Shu, Kui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00228-025-03919-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>While current clinical guidelines generally advocate for beta-blocker therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), conflicting findings have surfaced through large-scale observational studies and meta-analyses. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational studies to quantify the long-term therapeutic impact of beta-blocker across heterogeneous AMI populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2000 to 2025 that examine the link between beta-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes (last search update: March 1, 2025). We used the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to evaluate the effect of beta-blocker therapy on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, or major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in AMI patients. Our analysis stratified these effects by study type, ejection fraction (EF), sample size, follow-up duration, and patient characteristics including primary coronary revascularization, ST-segment elevation status, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis incorporated 34 observational studies covering 233,303 AMI patients. Our results showed beta-blockers reduced all-cause (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82) and cardiac mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.89) in post-AMI patients, with no significant effect on MACE. In these patients, post-PCI and STEMI patients, beta-blockers lowered all-cause mortality but not MACE risk. Subgroup analysis revealed that beta-blockers decreased all-cause death in post-AMI patients with diabetes and COPD, but not in those with hypertension and AF. Stratified by EF, beta-blockers were beneficial for all-cause death (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.93), cardiac death (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.92), and MACE (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.96) in post-AMI patients with reduced EF and only decreased all-cause death in those with preserved EF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our meta-analysis suggests beta-blockers may offer long-term clinical benefits to AMI patients, particularly those with reduced EF. However, this is not conclusive for AMI patients with comorbidities or preserved EF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03919-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03919-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:虽然目前的临床指南普遍提倡急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的β受体阻滞剂治疗,但通过大规模观察性研究和荟萃分析,矛盾的发现浮出水面。我们对已发表的观察性研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化β受体阻滞剂对异质AMI人群的长期治疗影响。方法:我们对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库进行了综合检索,检索2000年至2025年发表的有关β受体阻滞剂治疗与临床结果之间关系的文章(最后一次检索更新:2025年3月1日)。我们使用比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(95% CI)来评估-受体阻滞剂治疗对AMI患者全因死亡率、心源性死亡或主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的影响。我们的分析根据研究类型、射血分数(EF)、样本量、随访时间和患者特征(包括原发性冠状动脉血运重建术、st段抬高状态和合并症)对这些影响进行了分层。结果:本荟萃分析纳入34项观察性研究,涵盖233,303例AMI患者。我们的结果显示-受体阻滞剂降低了ami后患者的全因死亡率(OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82)和心脏死亡率(OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.89),对MACE无显著影响。在这些患者中,pci术后和STEMI患者,受体阻滞剂降低了全因死亡率,但没有降低MACE风险。亚组分析显示-受体阻滞剂降低ami后合并糖尿病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的全因死亡率,但对合并高血压和房颤的患者没有作用。按EF分层,-受体阻滞剂对ami后EF减少的患者的全因死亡率(OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.93)、心源性死亡(OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.92)和MACE (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.96)有利,仅对保留EF的患者的全因死亡率有利。结论:我们的荟萃分析表明-受体阻滞剂可能为AMI患者提供长期临床益处,特别是那些EF降低的患者。然而,对于合并合并症或保留EF的AMI患者,这并不是决定性的。
β-blocker and clinical outcomes in patients after myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background and objective: While current clinical guidelines generally advocate for beta-blocker therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), conflicting findings have surfaced through large-scale observational studies and meta-analyses. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational studies to quantify the long-term therapeutic impact of beta-blocker across heterogeneous AMI populations.
Methods: We conducted comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for articles published from 2000 to 2025 that examine the link between beta-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes (last search update: March 1, 2025). We used the odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to evaluate the effect of beta-blocker therapy on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, or major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in AMI patients. Our analysis stratified these effects by study type, ejection fraction (EF), sample size, follow-up duration, and patient characteristics including primary coronary revascularization, ST-segment elevation status, and comorbidities.
Results: This meta-analysis incorporated 34 observational studies covering 233,303 AMI patients. Our results showed beta-blockers reduced all-cause (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82) and cardiac mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.89) in post-AMI patients, with no significant effect on MACE. In these patients, post-PCI and STEMI patients, beta-blockers lowered all-cause mortality but not MACE risk. Subgroup analysis revealed that beta-blockers decreased all-cause death in post-AMI patients with diabetes and COPD, but not in those with hypertension and AF. Stratified by EF, beta-blockers were beneficial for all-cause death (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60-0.93), cardiac death (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.56-0.92), and MACE (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.96) in post-AMI patients with reduced EF and only decreased all-cause death in those with preserved EF.
Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests beta-blockers may offer long-term clinical benefits to AMI patients, particularly those with reduced EF. However, this is not conclusive for AMI patients with comorbidities or preserved EF.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed.
Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor.
Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves
-a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or
-methods that are original in some basic sense, or
-a highly unexpected outcome, or
-conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.