低收入和中等收入国家1型糖尿病儿童和青少年护理模式:范围审查

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Brenda Bongaerts, Anna Leuwer, Fayola Sadiq, Benedikt Wolters, Yang Guo, Karina Tapinova, Omolola T Alade, Heidrun Janka, Juan Va Franco
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家1型糖尿病儿童和青少年护理模式:范围审查","authors":"Brenda Bongaerts, Anna Leuwer, Fayola Sadiq, Benedikt Wolters, Yang Guo, Karina Tapinova, Omolola T Alade, Heidrun Janka, Juan Va Franco","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD016214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to improve the outcomes of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), access to and quality of comprehensive acute and chronic care services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) must be improved.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify and summarise the characteristics of models of care for T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus from inception to 11 December 2023 without restrictions.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. We included all study types describing the implemented organisation (setting, healthcare facilities, financial resources) and delivery of T1DM care (treatment, self-management support, clinical monitoring) for the management of T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently screened and selected eligible studies, and charted relevant data from the included studies. The charted data were presented in a descriptive format.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included 40 studies that described models for T1DM care in 19 LMICs across the different WHO regions. African Region We identified models of care in Cameroon, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, largely supported by international initiatives like Changing Diabetes in Children (CDiC) and Life for a Child (LFAC). Models were implemented between 2004 and 2012, and aimed to enhance infrastructure and care delivery, including access to insulin, glucose monitoring supplies, and diabetes education for patients and caregivers. Multidisciplinary teams provided care across urban and rural settings, with some countries offering tele-support and diabetes camps. Financial and logistical barriers persisted despite governmental and humanitarian support. Region of the Americas We identified models of care in Brazil and Cuba, focusing on reducing complications, training human resources, and supporting psychosocial development. In Brazil, care was delivered at a secondary-level facility by a multidisciplinary team. In Cuba, care was provided by a tertiary-level childhood diabetes clinic. Both models emphasised diabetes education for patients and families, regular specialist consultations, and community awareness initiatives. Unique features included holiday camps in Cuba and internship programs for healthcare professionals in Brazil. Diabetes care in Brazil was free, with additional resources for those in need. South-East Asia Region We identified models of care in Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, with implementation between 2009 and 2015. These models aimed to improve access to care, self-management education, and awareness amongst healthcare workers and communities, particularly for children below the poverty line. Supported by initiatives such as CDiC, LFAC, and Action4Diabetes (A4D), the models delivered outpatient care through multidisciplinary teams, providing free insulin and supplies in most countries. Regular HbA1c monitoring, diabetes education, and psychological support were key components, along with community awareness initiatives in four countries. Financial barriers remained significant, particularly in Bangladesh and Thailand. European Region We identified models of care in Kazakhstan and Turkey, aiming to provide comprehensive diabetes care and improve patient well-being. In Kazakhstan, care included free insulin, glucose meters and test strips, and a monitoring system for hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis was in place. Turkey's National Childhood Diabetes Program, initiated from 1994 onwards, delivered care through multidisciplinary healthcare teams and included initiatives like the Diabetes at School Program to raise awareness. Financial barriers persisted in both countries concerning certain supplies and technologies. Eastern Mediterranean Region We identified a model of care in Morocco, implemented in 1986, that had expanded from a single tertiary-level facility to nine provincial secondary-level hospitals, covering a third of the country's young patients with T1DM. Care was delivered by multidisciplinary teams and included initial in-hospital treatment, followed by outpatient consultations every three months. Education in self-management was emphasised, with group sessions, holiday camps, and tailored resources for illiterate parents. A database system supported electronic data monitoring. Financial support was provided for low-income families through sponsors and associations, although insurance coverage was limited to insulin costs. Western Pacific Region We identified models of care for Cambodia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Laos, supported by the A4D program. T1DM care included free insulin, glucose meters, HbA1c testing, and emergency funds, with care delivered through tertiary and secondary-level facilities, except in Vietnam where a single tertiary-level clinic provided care. Multidisciplinary teams were present in Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, but not in Laos. Screening for diabetes complications varied, with the most comprehensive screening offered in Cambodia and Laos. Ongoing diabetes training for healthcare workers, and electronic patient databases were integral to the model of care. Financial barriers persisted in Laos, where certain screening assessments required out-of-pocket payment.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>In many countries included in this review, substantial improvements in T1DM care have been made, particularly through international partnerships. However, the sustainability, consistency, and comprehensiveness of care remain a consistent challenge for further improving life expectancy and quality of life for children and adolescents with T1DM.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>World Health Organization (WHO) REGISTRATION: Registration: OSF, via doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JZ65G.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"9 ","pages":"CD016214"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models of care for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Brenda Bongaerts, Anna Leuwer, Fayola Sadiq, Benedikt Wolters, Yang Guo, Karina Tapinova, Omolola T Alade, Heidrun Janka, Juan Va Franco\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.CD016214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In order to improve the outcomes of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), access to and quality of comprehensive acute and chronic care services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) must be improved.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify and summarise the characteristics of models of care for T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus from inception to 11 December 2023 without restrictions.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. We included all study types describing the implemented organisation (setting, healthcare facilities, financial resources) and delivery of T1DM care (treatment, self-management support, clinical monitoring) for the management of T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Two review authors independently screened and selected eligible studies, and charted relevant data from the included studies. The charted data were presented in a descriptive format.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included 40 studies that described models for T1DM care in 19 LMICs across the different WHO regions. African Region We identified models of care in Cameroon, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, largely supported by international initiatives like Changing Diabetes in Children (CDiC) and Life for a Child (LFAC). Models were implemented between 2004 and 2012, and aimed to enhance infrastructure and care delivery, including access to insulin, glucose monitoring supplies, and diabetes education for patients and caregivers. Multidisciplinary teams provided care across urban and rural settings, with some countries offering tele-support and diabetes camps. Financial and logistical barriers persisted despite governmental and humanitarian support. Region of the Americas We identified models of care in Brazil and Cuba, focusing on reducing complications, training human resources, and supporting psychosocial development. In Brazil, care was delivered at a secondary-level facility by a multidisciplinary team. In Cuba, care was provided by a tertiary-level childhood diabetes clinic. Both models emphasised diabetes education for patients and families, regular specialist consultations, and community awareness initiatives. Unique features included holiday camps in Cuba and internship programs for healthcare professionals in Brazil. Diabetes care in Brazil was free, with additional resources for those in need. South-East Asia Region We identified models of care in Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, with implementation between 2009 and 2015. These models aimed to improve access to care, self-management education, and awareness amongst healthcare workers and communities, particularly for children below the poverty line. Supported by initiatives such as CDiC, LFAC, and Action4Diabetes (A4D), the models delivered outpatient care through multidisciplinary teams, providing free insulin and supplies in most countries. Regular HbA1c monitoring, diabetes education, and psychological support were key components, along with community awareness initiatives in four countries. Financial barriers remained significant, particularly in Bangladesh and Thailand. European Region We identified models of care in Kazakhstan and Turkey, aiming to provide comprehensive diabetes care and improve patient well-being. In Kazakhstan, care included free insulin, glucose meters and test strips, and a monitoring system for hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis was in place. Turkey's National Childhood Diabetes Program, initiated from 1994 onwards, delivered care through multidisciplinary healthcare teams and included initiatives like the Diabetes at School Program to raise awareness. Financial barriers persisted in both countries concerning certain supplies and technologies. Eastern Mediterranean Region We identified a model of care in Morocco, implemented in 1986, that had expanded from a single tertiary-level facility to nine provincial secondary-level hospitals, covering a third of the country's young patients with T1DM. Care was delivered by multidisciplinary teams and included initial in-hospital treatment, followed by outpatient consultations every three months. Education in self-management was emphasised, with group sessions, holiday camps, and tailored resources for illiterate parents. A database system supported electronic data monitoring. Financial support was provided for low-income families through sponsors and associations, although insurance coverage was limited to insulin costs. Western Pacific Region We identified models of care for Cambodia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Laos, supported by the A4D program. T1DM care included free insulin, glucose meters, HbA1c testing, and emergency funds, with care delivered through tertiary and secondary-level facilities, except in Vietnam where a single tertiary-level clinic provided care. Multidisciplinary teams were present in Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, but not in Laos. Screening for diabetes complications varied, with the most comprehensive screening offered in Cambodia and Laos. Ongoing diabetes training for healthcare workers, and electronic patient databases were integral to the model of care. Financial barriers persisted in Laos, where certain screening assessments required out-of-pocket payment.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>In many countries included in this review, substantial improvements in T1DM care have been made, particularly through international partnerships. However, the sustainability, consistency, and comprehensiveness of care remain a consistent challenge for further improving life expectancy and quality of life for children and adolescents with T1DM.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>World Health Organization (WHO) REGISTRATION: Registration: OSF, via doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JZ65G.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"CD016214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421716/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016214\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了改善患有1型糖尿病(T1DM)的儿童和青少年的预后,必须改善中低收入国家(LMIC)急性和慢性综合护理服务的可及性和质量。目的:确定和总结低收入和中等收入国家儿童和青少年T1DM护理模式的特点。检索方法:检索MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)和世界卫生组织(WHO)全球索引Medicus自成立至2023年12月11日的文献,无任何限制。选择标准:我们按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导方针进行了范围审查。我们纳入了描述LMIC儿童和青少年T1DM管理的实施组织(环境、医疗设施、财政资源)和T1DM护理(治疗、自我管理支持、临床监测)提供的所有研究类型。资料收集和分析:两位综述作者独立筛选和选择符合条件的研究,并从纳入的研究中绘制相关数据图表。图表数据以描述性格式呈现。主要结果:我们纳入了40项研究,这些研究描述了世卫组织不同区域19个低收入国家的T1DM护理模式。我们确定了喀麦隆、肯尼亚、卢旺达、坦桑尼亚和乌干达的护理模式,这些模式在很大程度上得到了诸如改变儿童糖尿病(CDiC)和儿童生命(LFAC)等国际倡议的支持。这些模式在2004年至2012年期间实施,旨在加强基础设施和医疗服务,包括获得胰岛素、血糖监测用品以及对患者和护理人员的糖尿病教育。多学科小组在城市和农村环境中提供护理,一些国家还提供远程支持和糖尿病营地。尽管有政府和人道主义援助,财政和后勤障碍仍然存在。我们确定了巴西和古巴的护理模式,重点是减少并发症、培训人力资源和支持社会心理发展。在巴西,由一个多学科小组在二级设施提供护理。在古巴,护理由三级儿童糖尿病诊所提供。这两种模式都强调了对患者和家庭的糖尿病教育、定期专家咨询和社区意识倡议。独特的功能包括古巴的度假营地和巴西的医疗保健专业人员实习计划。巴西的糖尿病治疗是免费的,并为有需要的人提供额外的资源。我们确定了2009年至2015年间在孟加拉国、印度、缅甸、斯里兰卡和泰国实施的护理模式。这些模式旨在改善保健工作者和社区,特别是贫困线以下儿童获得保健、自我管理教育和认识的机会。在CDiC、LFAC和Action4Diabetes (A4D)等倡议的支持下,这些模型通过多学科团队提供门诊服务,在大多数国家提供免费胰岛素和用品。常规HbA1c监测、糖尿病教育和心理支持是关键组成部分,同时还有四个国家的社区意识活动。财政障碍仍然很大,特别是在孟加拉国和泰国。我们确定了哈萨克斯坦和土耳其的护理模式,旨在提供全面的糖尿病护理并改善患者的福祉。在哈萨克斯坦,治疗包括免费胰岛素、血糖仪和试纸,并建立了低血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒监测系统。土耳其从1994年起启动了国家儿童糖尿病方案,通过多学科医疗团队提供护理,并包括提高认识的学校糖尿病方案等倡议。两国在某些供应品和技术方面仍然存在财政壁垒。我们确定了1986年在摩洛哥实施的一种护理模式,该模式已从单一的三级医院扩展到9个省级二级医院,覆盖了该国三分之一的T1DM年轻患者。护理由多学科小组提供,包括最初的住院治疗,随后每三个月进行一次门诊会诊。自我管理方面的教育得到了强调,包括小组会议、假日营地和为不识字的父母量身定制的资源。数据库系统支持电子数据监测。通过赞助者和协会向低收入家庭提供财政支助,但保险范围仅限于胰岛素费用。在A4D项目的支持下,我们确定了柬埔寨、马来西亚、越南和老挝的护理模式。 T1DM治疗包括免费胰岛素、血糖仪、糖化血红蛋白检测和应急基金,通过三级和二级设施提供治疗,越南除外,那里只有一个三级诊所提供治疗。柬埔寨、马来西亚和越南有多学科小组,但老挝没有。对糖尿病并发症的筛查各不相同,柬埔寨和老挝提供了最全面的筛查。对卫生保健工作者的持续糖尿病培训和电子患者数据库是护理模式的组成部分。在老挝,财政障碍仍然存在,某些筛选评估需要自掏腰包。作者的结论:在本综述中包括的许多国家,特别是通过国际伙伴关系,T1DM治疗已经取得了实质性的改善。然而,护理的可持续性、一致性和全面性仍然是进一步提高T1DM儿童和青少年预期寿命和生活质量的一贯挑战。供资:世界卫生组织(卫生组织)注册:注册:OSF,通过doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JZ65G。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models of care for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Background: In order to improve the outcomes of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), access to and quality of comprehensive acute and chronic care services in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) must be improved.

Objectives: To identify and summarise the characteristics of models of care for T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.

Search methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus from inception to 11 December 2023 without restrictions.

Selection criteria: We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. We included all study types describing the implemented organisation (setting, healthcare facilities, financial resources) and delivery of T1DM care (treatment, self-management support, clinical monitoring) for the management of T1DM in children and adolescents in LMIC.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened and selected eligible studies, and charted relevant data from the included studies. The charted data were presented in a descriptive format.

Main results: We included 40 studies that described models for T1DM care in 19 LMICs across the different WHO regions. African Region We identified models of care in Cameroon, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda, largely supported by international initiatives like Changing Diabetes in Children (CDiC) and Life for a Child (LFAC). Models were implemented between 2004 and 2012, and aimed to enhance infrastructure and care delivery, including access to insulin, glucose monitoring supplies, and diabetes education for patients and caregivers. Multidisciplinary teams provided care across urban and rural settings, with some countries offering tele-support and diabetes camps. Financial and logistical barriers persisted despite governmental and humanitarian support. Region of the Americas We identified models of care in Brazil and Cuba, focusing on reducing complications, training human resources, and supporting psychosocial development. In Brazil, care was delivered at a secondary-level facility by a multidisciplinary team. In Cuba, care was provided by a tertiary-level childhood diabetes clinic. Both models emphasised diabetes education for patients and families, regular specialist consultations, and community awareness initiatives. Unique features included holiday camps in Cuba and internship programs for healthcare professionals in Brazil. Diabetes care in Brazil was free, with additional resources for those in need. South-East Asia Region We identified models of care in Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, with implementation between 2009 and 2015. These models aimed to improve access to care, self-management education, and awareness amongst healthcare workers and communities, particularly for children below the poverty line. Supported by initiatives such as CDiC, LFAC, and Action4Diabetes (A4D), the models delivered outpatient care through multidisciplinary teams, providing free insulin and supplies in most countries. Regular HbA1c monitoring, diabetes education, and psychological support were key components, along with community awareness initiatives in four countries. Financial barriers remained significant, particularly in Bangladesh and Thailand. European Region We identified models of care in Kazakhstan and Turkey, aiming to provide comprehensive diabetes care and improve patient well-being. In Kazakhstan, care included free insulin, glucose meters and test strips, and a monitoring system for hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis was in place. Turkey's National Childhood Diabetes Program, initiated from 1994 onwards, delivered care through multidisciplinary healthcare teams and included initiatives like the Diabetes at School Program to raise awareness. Financial barriers persisted in both countries concerning certain supplies and technologies. Eastern Mediterranean Region We identified a model of care in Morocco, implemented in 1986, that had expanded from a single tertiary-level facility to nine provincial secondary-level hospitals, covering a third of the country's young patients with T1DM. Care was delivered by multidisciplinary teams and included initial in-hospital treatment, followed by outpatient consultations every three months. Education in self-management was emphasised, with group sessions, holiday camps, and tailored resources for illiterate parents. A database system supported electronic data monitoring. Financial support was provided for low-income families through sponsors and associations, although insurance coverage was limited to insulin costs. Western Pacific Region We identified models of care for Cambodia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Laos, supported by the A4D program. T1DM care included free insulin, glucose meters, HbA1c testing, and emergency funds, with care delivered through tertiary and secondary-level facilities, except in Vietnam where a single tertiary-level clinic provided care. Multidisciplinary teams were present in Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, but not in Laos. Screening for diabetes complications varied, with the most comprehensive screening offered in Cambodia and Laos. Ongoing diabetes training for healthcare workers, and electronic patient databases were integral to the model of care. Financial barriers persisted in Laos, where certain screening assessments required out-of-pocket payment.

Authors' conclusions: In many countries included in this review, substantial improvements in T1DM care have been made, particularly through international partnerships. However, the sustainability, consistency, and comprehensiveness of care remain a consistent challenge for further improving life expectancy and quality of life for children and adolescents with T1DM.

Funding: World Health Organization (WHO) REGISTRATION: Registration: OSF, via doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JZ65G.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信