高速、高威胁情景下飞行员的认知参与特征分析。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Matthew D'Alessandro, Ryan Mackie, Tom Berger, Carl Ott, Christopher Sullivan, James Barnett, Ian Curry
{"title":"高速、高威胁情景下飞行员的认知参与特征分析。","authors":"Matthew D'Alessandro, Ryan Mackie, Tom Berger, Carl Ott, Christopher Sullivan, James Barnett, Ian Curry","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6664.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated pilot cognitive engagement patterns across diverse flight conditions using electroencephalography (EEG)-based measurements in a high-fidelity rotary-wing simulation environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 8 experienced U.S. Army test pilots completed 24 flights across 3 distinct route designs using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Vertical Motion Simulator, with airspeeds ranging from 120 to 240 kn. Analysis focused on EEG Beta/(Alpha + Theta) ratios as indicators of changing cognitive engagement over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed distinct cognitive engagement patterns across routes: highly variable individual responses in routes with changing navigation demands, more consistent cognitive engagement in systematic route designs, and intermediate variability in mixed-demand routes. Airspeed effects on cognitive engagement became particularly pronounced above 200 kn, though these effects varied significantly by route and individual pilot. Temporal analysis demonstrated evolving patterns of cognitive adaptation, with routes eliciting different progression patterns over extended flight periods. Regression analysis showed that EEG Beta/(Alpha+Theta) values increased significantly during all three routes, with mean increases ranging from 0.0051-0.0146.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide quantifiable metrics for optimizing route design, developing personalized training approaches, and implementing real-time monitoring systems for enhanced aviation safety and performance. D'Alessandro M, Mackie R, Berger T, Ott C, Sullivan C, Barnett J III, Curry I. Cognitive engagement profiling of pilots in high-speed, high-threat scenarios. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(9):819-828.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"96 9","pages":"819-828"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Engagement Profiling of Pilots in High-Speed, High-Threat Scenarios.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D'Alessandro, Ryan Mackie, Tom Berger, Carl Ott, Christopher Sullivan, James Barnett, Ian Curry\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/AMHP.6664.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated pilot cognitive engagement patterns across diverse flight conditions using electroencephalography (EEG)-based measurements in a high-fidelity rotary-wing simulation environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 8 experienced U.S. Army test pilots completed 24 flights across 3 distinct route designs using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Vertical Motion Simulator, with airspeeds ranging from 120 to 240 kn. Analysis focused on EEG Beta/(Alpha + Theta) ratios as indicators of changing cognitive engagement over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed distinct cognitive engagement patterns across routes: highly variable individual responses in routes with changing navigation demands, more consistent cognitive engagement in systematic route designs, and intermediate variability in mixed-demand routes. Airspeed effects on cognitive engagement became particularly pronounced above 200 kn, though these effects varied significantly by route and individual pilot. Temporal analysis demonstrated evolving patterns of cognitive adaptation, with routes eliciting different progression patterns over extended flight periods. Regression analysis showed that EEG Beta/(Alpha+Theta) values increased significantly during all three routes, with mean increases ranging from 0.0051-0.0146.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide quantifiable metrics for optimizing route design, developing personalized training approaches, and implementing real-time monitoring systems for enhanced aviation safety and performance. D'Alessandro M, Mackie R, Berger T, Ott C, Sullivan C, Barnett J III, Curry I. Cognitive engagement profiling of pilots in high-speed, high-threat scenarios. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(9):819-828.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"volume\":\"96 9\",\"pages\":\"819-828\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6664.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6664.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在高保真的旋翼模拟环境中,利用基于脑电图(EEG)的测量,调查了飞行员在不同飞行条件下的认知参与模式。方法:共有8名经验丰富的美国陆军试飞员使用美国国家航空航天局埃姆斯垂直运动模拟器完成了3条不同路线设计的24次飞行,空速范围从120到240千牛。分析的重点是脑电图β /(α + θ)比率作为随时间变化的认知参与的指标。结果:分析揭示了不同路线的不同认知参与模式:在导航需求变化的路线上,个体反应高度可变;在系统路线设计中,认知参与更加一致;在混合需求路线上,认知参与具有中等可变性。空速对认知参与的影响在200千牛顿以上尤为明显,尽管这些影响因航线和飞行员个体而有显著差异。时间分析显示了认知适应的进化模式,随着飞行时间的延长,航线会引发不同的发展模式。回归分析显示,3种治疗方式下脑电β /(Alpha+Theta)值均显著升高,平均升高幅度在0.0051 ~ 0.0146之间。讨论:这些发现为优化航线设计、开发个性化培训方法和实施实时监控系统提供了可量化的指标,以提高航空安全和性能。李建军,李建军,李建军,李建军。基于认知参与的飞行员认知参与特征分析。航空航天Med Hum Perform. 2025;96(9): 819 - 828。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Engagement Profiling of Pilots in High-Speed, High-Threat Scenarios.

Introduction: This study investigated pilot cognitive engagement patterns across diverse flight conditions using electroencephalography (EEG)-based measurements in a high-fidelity rotary-wing simulation environment.

Methods: A total of 8 experienced U.S. Army test pilots completed 24 flights across 3 distinct route designs using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Vertical Motion Simulator, with airspeeds ranging from 120 to 240 kn. Analysis focused on EEG Beta/(Alpha + Theta) ratios as indicators of changing cognitive engagement over time.

Results: Analyses revealed distinct cognitive engagement patterns across routes: highly variable individual responses in routes with changing navigation demands, more consistent cognitive engagement in systematic route designs, and intermediate variability in mixed-demand routes. Airspeed effects on cognitive engagement became particularly pronounced above 200 kn, though these effects varied significantly by route and individual pilot. Temporal analysis demonstrated evolving patterns of cognitive adaptation, with routes eliciting different progression patterns over extended flight periods. Regression analysis showed that EEG Beta/(Alpha+Theta) values increased significantly during all three routes, with mean increases ranging from 0.0051-0.0146.

Discussion: These findings provide quantifiable metrics for optimizing route design, developing personalized training approaches, and implementing real-time monitoring systems for enhanced aviation safety and performance. D'Alessandro M, Mackie R, Berger T, Ott C, Sullivan C, Barnett J III, Curry I. Cognitive engagement profiling of pilots in high-speed, high-threat scenarios. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(9):819-828.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信