跌倒后在家中保持独立:对痴呆症患者的MAINTAIN多组分干预的过程评估。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Leanne Greene, Louise M Allan, Alison Bingham, Ashima Sharma, Bethany Whale, Robert Barber, Christopher Fox, Victoria A Goodwin, Adam Lee Gordon, Abigail J Hall, Rowan H Harwood, Claire Hulme, Thomas Andrew Jackson, Rachel Litherland, Steve W Parry, Obi Ukoumunne, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer
{"title":"跌倒后在家中保持独立:对痴呆症患者的MAINTAIN多组分干预的过程评估。","authors":"Leanne Greene, Louise M Allan, Alison Bingham, Ashima Sharma, Bethany Whale, Robert Barber, Christopher Fox, Victoria A Goodwin, Adam Lee Gordon, Abigail J Hall, Rowan H Harwood, Claire Hulme, Thomas Andrew Jackson, Rachel Litherland, Steve W Parry, Obi Ukoumunne, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with dementia who have a fall can experience both physical and psychological effects, often leading to diminished independence. Falls impose economic costs on the healthcare system. Despite elevated fall risks in dementia populations, evidence supporting effective home-based interventions remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple-methods process evaluation within a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial informed by a realist approach. Settings included six UK sites/clusters (three intervention, three control). Fidelity checks on routine data collection and fidelity observations of intervention sessions, multidisciplinary team meetings and supervision sessions were undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with dementia, caregivers and intervention therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MAINTAIN intervention demonstrated high fidelity in home assessments and intervention delivery, with participants receiving a mean of 15 of the 22 available sessions with a range of 5-25 sessions. Qualitative findings revealed that regular home visits increased engagement and motivation. Multidisciplinary team support enhanced therapists' confidence, particularly with complex cases. While most participants achieved their functional goals and reported improved confidence, challenges included geographical disparities in service delivery, carer burden and varying effectiveness of referral pathways. Therapists' attitudes towards advanced dementia influenced intervention delivery. The paired approach, involving both the person living with dementia and their carer, supported activity engagement but occasionally added extra responsibilities for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAINTAIN was both feasible and acceptable. Future studies should consider standardising multidisciplinary support, incorporating targeted falls-related anxiety support and establishing sustainable post-intervention maintenance strategies. Protocol adaptations, such as video consultations, showed promise in addressing workforce constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining independence at home after a fall: a process evaluation of the MAINTAIN multicomponent intervention for people living with dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Leanne Greene, Louise M Allan, Alison Bingham, Ashima Sharma, Bethany Whale, Robert Barber, Christopher Fox, Victoria A Goodwin, Adam Lee Gordon, Abigail J Hall, Rowan H Harwood, Claire Hulme, Thomas Andrew Jackson, Rachel Litherland, Steve W Parry, Obi Ukoumunne, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with dementia who have a fall can experience both physical and psychological effects, often leading to diminished independence. Falls impose economic costs on the healthcare system. Despite elevated fall risks in dementia populations, evidence supporting effective home-based interventions remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple-methods process evaluation within a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial informed by a realist approach. Settings included six UK sites/clusters (three intervention, three control). Fidelity checks on routine data collection and fidelity observations of intervention sessions, multidisciplinary team meetings and supervision sessions were undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with dementia, caregivers and intervention therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MAINTAIN intervention demonstrated high fidelity in home assessments and intervention delivery, with participants receiving a mean of 15 of the 22 available sessions with a range of 5-25 sessions. Qualitative findings revealed that regular home visits increased engagement and motivation. Multidisciplinary team support enhanced therapists' confidence, particularly with complex cases. While most participants achieved their functional goals and reported improved confidence, challenges included geographical disparities in service delivery, carer burden and varying effectiveness of referral pathways. Therapists' attitudes towards advanced dementia influenced intervention delivery. The paired approach, involving both the person living with dementia and their carer, supported activity engagement but occasionally added extra responsibilities for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAINTAIN was both feasible and acceptable. Future studies should consider standardising multidisciplinary support, incorporating targeted falls-related anxiety support and establishing sustainable post-intervention maintenance strategies. Protocol adaptations, such as video consultations, showed promise in addressing workforce constraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"54 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421879/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf245\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跌倒的痴呆症患者会经历身体和心理上的影响,往往导致独立性下降。跌倒给医疗系统带来了经济成本。尽管痴呆症人群跌倒风险升高,但支持有效的家庭干预措施的证据仍然有限。方法:采用现实主义方法,在一项随机对照试验中进行多方法过程评估。设置包括六个英国站点/集群(三个干预,三个控制)。对日常数据收集进行保真检查,对干预会议、多学科小组会议和监督会议进行保真观察。研究人员对痴呆症患者、护理人员和干预治疗师进行了半结构化访谈。结果:维持干预在家庭评估和干预交付中表现出高保真度,参与者平均接受22个可用会话中的15个,范围为5-25个会话。定性调查结果显示,定期家访提高了参与度和积极性。多学科团队的支持增强了治疗师的信心,特别是对于复杂的病例。虽然大多数参与者实现了他们的职能目标,并报告信心有所提高,但挑战包括服务提供的地域差异、护理人员负担和转诊途径的不同有效性。治疗师对晚期痴呆的态度影响干预的实施。配对方法包括痴呆症患者和他们的照顾者,支持活动参与,但偶尔会增加照顾者的额外责任。结论:维持是可行且可接受的。未来的研究应考虑标准化多学科支持,纳入有针对性的跌倒相关焦虑支持,并建立可持续的干预后维持策略。协议调整,如视频咨询,在解决劳动力限制方面显示出希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Maintaining independence at home after a fall: a process evaluation of the MAINTAIN multicomponent intervention for people living with dementia.

Maintaining independence at home after a fall: a process evaluation of the MAINTAIN multicomponent intervention for people living with dementia.

Maintaining independence at home after a fall: a process evaluation of the MAINTAIN multicomponent intervention for people living with dementia.

Background: People with dementia who have a fall can experience both physical and psychological effects, often leading to diminished independence. Falls impose economic costs on the healthcare system. Despite elevated fall risks in dementia populations, evidence supporting effective home-based interventions remains limited.

Methods: Multiple-methods process evaluation within a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial informed by a realist approach. Settings included six UK sites/clusters (three intervention, three control). Fidelity checks on routine data collection and fidelity observations of intervention sessions, multidisciplinary team meetings and supervision sessions were undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with dementia, caregivers and intervention therapists.

Results: The MAINTAIN intervention demonstrated high fidelity in home assessments and intervention delivery, with participants receiving a mean of 15 of the 22 available sessions with a range of 5-25 sessions. Qualitative findings revealed that regular home visits increased engagement and motivation. Multidisciplinary team support enhanced therapists' confidence, particularly with complex cases. While most participants achieved their functional goals and reported improved confidence, challenges included geographical disparities in service delivery, carer burden and varying effectiveness of referral pathways. Therapists' attitudes towards advanced dementia influenced intervention delivery. The paired approach, involving both the person living with dementia and their carer, supported activity engagement but occasionally added extra responsibilities for caregivers.

Conclusions: MAINTAIN was both feasible and acceptable. Future studies should consider standardising multidisciplinary support, incorporating targeted falls-related anxiety support and establishing sustainable post-intervention maintenance strategies. Protocol adaptations, such as video consultations, showed promise in addressing workforce constraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信