根据PSMA- rads 2.0标准,Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT对模糊性病变的观察者间和观察者内一致。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Khanim Niftaliyeva, Selin Kesim, Nuh Filizoglu, Zeynep Ceren Balaban Genc, Salih Ozguven, Feyza Cagliyan, Tunc Ones, Fuat Dede, Halil Turgut Turoglu, Tanju Yusuf Erdil
{"title":"根据PSMA- rads 2.0标准,Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT对模糊性病变的观察者间和观察者内一致。","authors":"Khanim Niftaliyeva, Selin Kesim, Nuh Filizoglu, Zeynep Ceren Balaban Genc, Salih Ozguven, Feyza Cagliyan, Tunc Ones, Fuat Dede, Halil Turgut Turoglu, Tanju Yusuf Erdil","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02103-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to systematically evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement regarding lesions with uncertain malignancy potential in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer patients, utilizing the PSMA-RADS 2.0 classification system, and to emphasize the malignancy evidence associated with these lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT images of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer via histopathology between December 2016 and November 2023. Seventy-six patients and 98 target lesions, classified with PSMA-RADS scores 3A-3D by an experienced nuclear medicine specialist, were included. Three observers (two experienced and one less experienced nuclear medicine physician) evaluated the lesions at two different time points, three months apart, in a blinded manner. Intra-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa, while inter-observer agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All observers demonstrated significant intra-observer agreement, with percentages ranging from 67.3 to 80.6% and kappa values between 0.62 and 0.76. The highest intra-observer agreement was noted for bone lesions, while non-regional lymph nodes exhibited the lowest agreement. For inter-observer assessments, moderate agreement was observed across all lesions (Fleiss k = 0.51), with the highest agreement in regional lymph nodes and the lowest in non-regional lymph nodes and bone lesions. Follow-up results indicated malignancy detection rates of 63.4% for 3A, 47% for 3B, 44.5% for 3C, and 41.4% for 3D scored lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PSMA-RADS classification system demonstrated substantial intra-observer agreement and moderate inter-observer agreement for lesions with uncertain malignancy potential, supporting its clinical applicability. However, notable variability and limitations in reporting bone lesions, non-regional lymph nodes, and lung lesions were observed among readers. The ambiguous nature and management of PSMA-RADS 3 lesions underscore the need for further research to enhance risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for equivocal lesions in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT according to PSMA-RADS 2.0 criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Khanim Niftaliyeva, Selin Kesim, Nuh Filizoglu, Zeynep Ceren Balaban Genc, Salih Ozguven, Feyza Cagliyan, Tunc Ones, Fuat Dede, Halil Turgut Turoglu, Tanju Yusuf Erdil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12149-025-02103-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to systematically evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement regarding lesions with uncertain malignancy potential in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer patients, utilizing the PSMA-RADS 2.0 classification system, and to emphasize the malignancy evidence associated with these lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT images of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer via histopathology between December 2016 and November 2023. Seventy-six patients and 98 target lesions, classified with PSMA-RADS scores 3A-3D by an experienced nuclear medicine specialist, were included. Three observers (two experienced and one less experienced nuclear medicine physician) evaluated the lesions at two different time points, three months apart, in a blinded manner. Intra-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa, while inter-observer agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All observers demonstrated significant intra-observer agreement, with percentages ranging from 67.3 to 80.6% and kappa values between 0.62 and 0.76. The highest intra-observer agreement was noted for bone lesions, while non-regional lymph nodes exhibited the lowest agreement. For inter-observer assessments, moderate agreement was observed across all lesions (Fleiss k = 0.51), with the highest agreement in regional lymph nodes and the lowest in non-regional lymph nodes and bone lesions. Follow-up results indicated malignancy detection rates of 63.4% for 3A, 47% for 3B, 44.5% for 3C, and 41.4% for 3D scored lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PSMA-RADS classification system demonstrated substantial intra-observer agreement and moderate inter-observer agreement for lesions with uncertain malignancy potential, supporting its clinical applicability. However, notable variability and limitations in reporting bone lesions, non-regional lymph nodes, and lung lesions were observed among readers. The ambiguous nature and management of PSMA-RADS 3 lesions underscore the need for further research to enhance risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02103-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02103-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在利用PSMA- rads 2.0分类系统,系统评价Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT对前列腺癌患者恶性潜能不确定病变的观察者间和观察者内一致性,并强调与这些病变相关的恶性证据。方法:回顾性分析2016年12月至2023年11月经组织病理学诊断为前列腺癌患者的Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT图像。76名患者和98个靶病变,由经验丰富的核医学专家按PSMA-RADS评分3A-3D进行分类。三名观察员(两名经验丰富的核医学医生和一名经验不足的核医学医生)以盲法在两个不同的时间点评估病变,间隔三个月。观察员内部协议使用Cohen的kappa进行评估,而观察员之间的协议使用Fleiss的kappa进行分析。结果:所有观察者都表现出显著的观察者内部一致性,百分比范围从67.3到80.6%,kappa值在0.62到0.76之间。观察者内部一致性最高的是骨病变,而非区域淋巴结表现出最低的一致性。对于观察者间评估,在所有病变中观察到中度一致性(Fleiss k = 0.51),区域淋巴结一致性最高,非区域淋巴结和骨病变一致性最低。随访结果显示,3A级病变的恶性检出率为63.4%,3B级为47%,3C级为44.5%,3D级病变为41.4%。结论:PSMA-RADS分类系统对潜在恶性肿瘤不确定的病变具有较高的观察者内一致性和中度的观察者间一致性,支持其临床适用性。然而,在报告骨骼病变、非区域淋巴结和肺部病变方面,读者中观察到显著的差异和局限性。PSMA-RADS 3病变的模糊性质和管理强调了进一步研究以加强风险分层的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for equivocal lesions in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT according to PSMA-RADS 2.0 criteria.

Objective: This study aims to systematically evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement regarding lesions with uncertain malignancy potential in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer patients, utilizing the PSMA-RADS 2.0 classification system, and to emphasize the malignancy evidence associated with these lesions.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT images of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer via histopathology between December 2016 and November 2023. Seventy-six patients and 98 target lesions, classified with PSMA-RADS scores 3A-3D by an experienced nuclear medicine specialist, were included. Three observers (two experienced and one less experienced nuclear medicine physician) evaluated the lesions at two different time points, three months apart, in a blinded manner. Intra-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa, while inter-observer agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa.

Results: All observers demonstrated significant intra-observer agreement, with percentages ranging from 67.3 to 80.6% and kappa values between 0.62 and 0.76. The highest intra-observer agreement was noted for bone lesions, while non-regional lymph nodes exhibited the lowest agreement. For inter-observer assessments, moderate agreement was observed across all lesions (Fleiss k = 0.51), with the highest agreement in regional lymph nodes and the lowest in non-regional lymph nodes and bone lesions. Follow-up results indicated malignancy detection rates of 63.4% for 3A, 47% for 3B, 44.5% for 3C, and 41.4% for 3D scored lesions.

Conclusions: The PSMA-RADS classification system demonstrated substantial intra-observer agreement and moderate inter-observer agreement for lesions with uncertain malignancy potential, supporting its clinical applicability. However, notable variability and limitations in reporting bone lesions, non-regional lymph nodes, and lung lesions were observed among readers. The ambiguous nature and management of PSMA-RADS 3 lesions underscore the need for further research to enhance risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信