快速喷气机飞行员头部和躯干运动的真实飞行观察。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Rene Lingscheid, Kirsten Albracht, Fabian Goell, Roland Nuesse, Robert Rein, Bjoern Braunstein
{"title":"快速喷气机飞行员头部和躯干运动的真实飞行观察。","authors":"Rene Lingscheid, Kirsten Albracht, Fabian Goell, Roland Nuesse, Robert Rein, Bjoern Braunstein","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6631.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military fast jet pilots face significant physical challenges, including high Gz accelerations during dynamic maneuvers. The objectives of this study were threefold: 1) to record pilot movements during real flights, 2) to quantify head and trunk movements under standardized Gz conditions and during basic fighter maneuvers (BFMs), and 3) to categorize compensatory strategies used to mitigate physical strain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 Eurofighter pilots (mean age: 28.2 ± 1.4 yr, all men) with >500 h EF2000 flight experience participated in the study. Video footage collected during the execution of a standardized mission card, including predetermined head movements and jet parameters (5, 7, 9 Gz), and free basic fighter maneuvers were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During scripted high-Gz maneuvers, 38.5% of pilots prepositioned their head for the up-max movement at 9 Gz. During check six, coping strategies were applied in 35.7% (5 Gz), 30.8% (7 Gz), and 33.3% (9 Gz) of the flights. During basic fighter maneuvers, an average of 63.6 ± 32.1 head movements per session and 27.2 ± 13.7 per set were performed by the pilots. It was observed that end-range movements (e.g., check six) were associated with a greater usage of coping strategies. The most commonly included strategies were the use of support points such as canopy rails.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This real-flight study reveals frequent use of anticipatory head positioning and compensatory strategies under high Gz loads, especially during end-range movements. These behaviors appear to serve the purpose of reducing cervical strain and injury risk. The findings underscore the necessity for targeted training and the optimization of ergonomic design in pilot equipment. Lingscheid R, Albracht K, Goell F, Nuesse R, Rein R, Braunstein B. Real-flight observations of head and trunk movements of fast jet pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(9):810-818.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"96 9","pages":"810-818"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Flight Observations of Head and Trunk Movements of Fast Jet Pilots.\",\"authors\":\"Rene Lingscheid, Kirsten Albracht, Fabian Goell, Roland Nuesse, Robert Rein, Bjoern Braunstein\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/AMHP.6631.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Military fast jet pilots face significant physical challenges, including high Gz accelerations during dynamic maneuvers. The objectives of this study were threefold: 1) to record pilot movements during real flights, 2) to quantify head and trunk movements under standardized Gz conditions and during basic fighter maneuvers (BFMs), and 3) to categorize compensatory strategies used to mitigate physical strain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 Eurofighter pilots (mean age: 28.2 ± 1.4 yr, all men) with >500 h EF2000 flight experience participated in the study. Video footage collected during the execution of a standardized mission card, including predetermined head movements and jet parameters (5, 7, 9 Gz), and free basic fighter maneuvers were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During scripted high-Gz maneuvers, 38.5% of pilots prepositioned their head for the up-max movement at 9 Gz. During check six, coping strategies were applied in 35.7% (5 Gz), 30.8% (7 Gz), and 33.3% (9 Gz) of the flights. During basic fighter maneuvers, an average of 63.6 ± 32.1 head movements per session and 27.2 ± 13.7 per set were performed by the pilots. It was observed that end-range movements (e.g., check six) were associated with a greater usage of coping strategies. The most commonly included strategies were the use of support points such as canopy rails.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This real-flight study reveals frequent use of anticipatory head positioning and compensatory strategies under high Gz loads, especially during end-range movements. These behaviors appear to serve the purpose of reducing cervical strain and injury risk. The findings underscore the necessity for targeted training and the optimization of ergonomic design in pilot equipment. Lingscheid R, Albracht K, Goell F, Nuesse R, Rein R, Braunstein B. Real-flight observations of head and trunk movements of fast jet pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(9):810-818.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"volume\":\"96 9\",\"pages\":\"810-818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6631.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6631.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:军用快速喷气式飞机飞行员面临着重大的身体挑战,包括在动态机动过程中的高Gz加速度。本研究的目的有三个:1)记录飞行员在真实飞行中的动作,2)量化标准化Gz条件下和基本战斗机机动(BFMs)期间的头部和躯干运动,以及3)分类用于减轻身体紧张的补偿策略。方法:共有20名欧洲战斗机飞行员(平均年龄:28.2±1.4岁,均为男性)参加了这项研究,他们的EF2000飞行经验为bbb500 h。在执行标准化任务卡期间收集的视频片段,包括预定的头部运动和喷气参数(5,7,9 Gz),以及自由基本战斗机机动进行了分析。结果:在脚本高Gz机动中,38.5%的飞行员在9gz时将头部预先定位为最大运动。在检查六中,有35.7% (5 Gz)、30.8% (7 Gz)和33.3% (9 Gz)的航班采取了应对策略。在战斗机基本机动中,飞行员每节平均头部动作63.6±32.1次,每组平均头部动作27.2±13.7次。据观察,末端动作(例如,6号棋)与更多地使用应对策略有关。最常见的策略是使用支撑点,如天篷栏杆。讨论:这项真实飞行研究揭示了在高Gz负荷下,特别是在末端运动中,频繁使用预期头部定位和补偿策略。这些行为似乎有助于减少颈椎劳损和损伤风险。研究结果强调了有针对性的培训和优化飞行员设备的人体工程学设计的必要性。Lingscheid R, Albracht K, Goell F, Nuesse R, Rein R, Braunstein B.快速喷气式飞机驾驶员头部和躯干运动的真实飞行观察。航空航天Med Hum Perform. 2025;96(9): 810 - 818。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-Flight Observations of Head and Trunk Movements of Fast Jet Pilots.

Introduction: Military fast jet pilots face significant physical challenges, including high Gz accelerations during dynamic maneuvers. The objectives of this study were threefold: 1) to record pilot movements during real flights, 2) to quantify head and trunk movements under standardized Gz conditions and during basic fighter maneuvers (BFMs), and 3) to categorize compensatory strategies used to mitigate physical strain.

Methods: A total of 20 Eurofighter pilots (mean age: 28.2 ± 1.4 yr, all men) with >500 h EF2000 flight experience participated in the study. Video footage collected during the execution of a standardized mission card, including predetermined head movements and jet parameters (5, 7, 9 Gz), and free basic fighter maneuvers were analyzed.

Results: During scripted high-Gz maneuvers, 38.5% of pilots prepositioned their head for the up-max movement at 9 Gz. During check six, coping strategies were applied in 35.7% (5 Gz), 30.8% (7 Gz), and 33.3% (9 Gz) of the flights. During basic fighter maneuvers, an average of 63.6 ± 32.1 head movements per session and 27.2 ± 13.7 per set were performed by the pilots. It was observed that end-range movements (e.g., check six) were associated with a greater usage of coping strategies. The most commonly included strategies were the use of support points such as canopy rails.

Discussion: This real-flight study reveals frequent use of anticipatory head positioning and compensatory strategies under high Gz loads, especially during end-range movements. These behaviors appear to serve the purpose of reducing cervical strain and injury risk. The findings underscore the necessity for targeted training and the optimization of ergonomic design in pilot equipment. Lingscheid R, Albracht K, Goell F, Nuesse R, Rein R, Braunstein B. Real-flight observations of head and trunk movements of fast jet pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(9):810-818.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信