{"title":"葡萄牙阿拉达山Fraguinha水镜区生态系统服务:方法的比较分析","authors":"F. A. da Graça, M. E. F. Silva","doi":"10.1007/s13762-025-06518-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecosystem Services (ES) include all resources and services provided by ecosystems. Given the human impacts on ecosystems, it is essential to develop methods for evaluating and quantifying these services to ensure their sustainable management and protection. The primary aim of this study is a comparative analysis assessment of the Ecosystem Services in the Fraguinha Water Mirror area, located in the Arada Mountain, in Portugal. Additionally, it seeks to understand public interaction with these services, particularly in relation to a proposed river beach construction in the area. To reach these goals it was applied two methodologies based on the principles of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: direct field data collection and a population survey, an indirect method of data collection. The direct assessment of the Fraguinha study area shows a rich ecological landscape characterized by a heterogeneous set of ES. The Provisioning (54%) and Regulating (46%) services predominate, followed by Cultural (32%) and Supporting (21%) services. However, the result of indirect assessment shows that the public highlight the Cultural Services, suggesting the potential to expand recreational opportunities. The survey results show a weak correlation between the construction of the river beach and a significant increase in visitor numbers, and that there is a preference for keeping the area as natural as possible. Results reveal discrepancies between the two methodologies (direct and indirect methods) highlighting the need to develop an integrated ES assessment. Despite these differences, both methods suggest that the Fraguinha area has potential to improve its leisure and cultural offerings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"22 14","pages":"13947 - 13960"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-025-06518-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem services in the Fraguinha water mirror area, Arada Mountain, Portugal: a comparative analysis of methodologies\",\"authors\":\"F. A. da Graça, M. E. F. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-025-06518-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecosystem Services (ES) include all resources and services provided by ecosystems. Given the human impacts on ecosystems, it is essential to develop methods for evaluating and quantifying these services to ensure their sustainable management and protection. The primary aim of this study is a comparative analysis assessment of the Ecosystem Services in the Fraguinha Water Mirror area, located in the Arada Mountain, in Portugal. Additionally, it seeks to understand public interaction with these services, particularly in relation to a proposed river beach construction in the area. To reach these goals it was applied two methodologies based on the principles of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: direct field data collection and a population survey, an indirect method of data collection. The direct assessment of the Fraguinha study area shows a rich ecological landscape characterized by a heterogeneous set of ES. The Provisioning (54%) and Regulating (46%) services predominate, followed by Cultural (32%) and Supporting (21%) services. However, the result of indirect assessment shows that the public highlight the Cultural Services, suggesting the potential to expand recreational opportunities. The survey results show a weak correlation between the construction of the river beach and a significant increase in visitor numbers, and that there is a preference for keeping the area as natural as possible. Results reveal discrepancies between the two methodologies (direct and indirect methods) highlighting the need to develop an integrated ES assessment. Despite these differences, both methods suggest that the Fraguinha area has potential to improve its leisure and cultural offerings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"22 14\",\"pages\":\"13947 - 13960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13762-025-06518-x.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-025-06518-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-025-06518-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生态系统服务(ES)包括生态系统提供的所有资源和服务。鉴于人类对生态系统的影响,必须制定评估和量化这些服务的方法,以确保其可持续管理和保护。本研究的主要目的是对位于葡萄牙Arada山的Fraguinha Water Mirror地区的生态系统服务进行比较分析评估。此外,它还试图了解公众与这些服务的互动,特别是与该地区拟议的河滩建设有关。为了实现这些目标,采用了基于千年生态系统评估原则的两种方法:直接实地数据收集和人口调查,这是一种间接的数据收集方法。直接评价结果表明,研究区生态景观丰富,具有ES的异质性。供应(54%)和调节(46%)服务占主导地位,其次是文化(32%)和支持(21%)服务。然而,间接评估的结果显示,市民强调文化服务,这表明有潜力扩大娱乐机会。调查结果显示,河滩的建设与游客数量的显著增加之间存在微弱的相关性,人们更倾向于保持该地区尽可能的自然。结果揭示了两种方法(直接方法和间接方法)之间的差异,突出了开发综合ES评估的必要性。尽管存在这些差异,但这两种方法都表明,Fraguinha地区有潜力改善其休闲和文化产品。
Ecosystem services in the Fraguinha water mirror area, Arada Mountain, Portugal: a comparative analysis of methodologies
Ecosystem Services (ES) include all resources and services provided by ecosystems. Given the human impacts on ecosystems, it is essential to develop methods for evaluating and quantifying these services to ensure their sustainable management and protection. The primary aim of this study is a comparative analysis assessment of the Ecosystem Services in the Fraguinha Water Mirror area, located in the Arada Mountain, in Portugal. Additionally, it seeks to understand public interaction with these services, particularly in relation to a proposed river beach construction in the area. To reach these goals it was applied two methodologies based on the principles of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: direct field data collection and a population survey, an indirect method of data collection. The direct assessment of the Fraguinha study area shows a rich ecological landscape characterized by a heterogeneous set of ES. The Provisioning (54%) and Regulating (46%) services predominate, followed by Cultural (32%) and Supporting (21%) services. However, the result of indirect assessment shows that the public highlight the Cultural Services, suggesting the potential to expand recreational opportunities. The survey results show a weak correlation between the construction of the river beach and a significant increase in visitor numbers, and that there is a preference for keeping the area as natural as possible. Results reveal discrepancies between the two methodologies (direct and indirect methods) highlighting the need to develop an integrated ES assessment. Despite these differences, both methods suggest that the Fraguinha area has potential to improve its leisure and cultural offerings.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management.
A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made.
The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.