{"title":"用于模拟静电凝聚器关键过程的两相电流体力学数值模型:综述(特邀论文)","authors":"V.A. Chirkov, S.A. Vasilkov, P.A. Kostin, I.A. Elagin","doi":"10.1016/j.elstat.2025.104085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>This review article aims to describe and compare widely used numerical models for the computer simulation of key electrohydrodynamic processes occurring in </span>electrostatic<span><span> coalescers, as well as to present the main results obtained using these models. Both pairwise droplet interaction models and multi-droplet models are considered. The former are based on tracking the movement of the interfacial boundary and employ approaches such as the phase-field, conservative level-set, coupled level-set and volume of fluid, arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian, isoAdvector, and boundary element (or integral) methods. The latter rely on a macroscopic description of emulsion evolution via the population balance model or by solving the equations of motion for a collection of droplets. In addition, the review includes models based on the </span>molecular dynamics method. For each model, its capabilities, advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are described, along with the possible types of results obtained and corresponding examples.</span></div><div>The results obtained address issues such as the threshold transition from coalescence to non-coalescence in droplet-droplet and droplet-layer systems, partial coalescence and the regime map of non-coalescence, as well as the interrelation of results derived from different types of models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrostatics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical models of two-phase electrohydrodynamics for simulating key processes in electrostatic coalescers: a review (invited paper)\",\"authors\":\"V.A. Chirkov, S.A. Vasilkov, P.A. Kostin, I.A. Elagin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elstat.2025.104085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span>This review article aims to describe and compare widely used numerical models for the computer simulation of key electrohydrodynamic processes occurring in </span>electrostatic<span><span> coalescers, as well as to present the main results obtained using these models. Both pairwise droplet interaction models and multi-droplet models are considered. The former are based on tracking the movement of the interfacial boundary and employ approaches such as the phase-field, conservative level-set, coupled level-set and volume of fluid, arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian, isoAdvector, and boundary element (or integral) methods. The latter rely on a macroscopic description of emulsion evolution via the population balance model or by solving the equations of motion for a collection of droplets. In addition, the review includes models based on the </span>molecular dynamics method. For each model, its capabilities, advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are described, along with the possible types of results obtained and corresponding examples.</span></div><div>The results obtained address issues such as the threshold transition from coalescence to non-coalescence in droplet-droplet and droplet-layer systems, partial coalescence and the regime map of non-coalescence, as well as the interrelation of results derived from different types of models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electrostatics\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electrostatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304388625000579\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrostatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304388625000579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Numerical models of two-phase electrohydrodynamics for simulating key processes in electrostatic coalescers: a review (invited paper)
This review article aims to describe and compare widely used numerical models for the computer simulation of key electrohydrodynamic processes occurring in electrostatic coalescers, as well as to present the main results obtained using these models. Both pairwise droplet interaction models and multi-droplet models are considered. The former are based on tracking the movement of the interfacial boundary and employ approaches such as the phase-field, conservative level-set, coupled level-set and volume of fluid, arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian, isoAdvector, and boundary element (or integral) methods. The latter rely on a macroscopic description of emulsion evolution via the population balance model or by solving the equations of motion for a collection of droplets. In addition, the review includes models based on the molecular dynamics method. For each model, its capabilities, advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are described, along with the possible types of results obtained and corresponding examples.
The results obtained address issues such as the threshold transition from coalescence to non-coalescence in droplet-droplet and droplet-layer systems, partial coalescence and the regime map of non-coalescence, as well as the interrelation of results derived from different types of models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Electrostatics is the leading forum for publishing research findings that advance knowledge in the field of electrostatics. We invite submissions in the following areas:
Electrostatic charge separation processes.
Electrostatic manipulation of particles, droplets, and biological cells.
Electrostatically driven or controlled fluid flow.
Electrostatics in the gas phase.