猪粪与厨余油共消化的协同效应及动力学评价

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cuong Manh Duong , Thu Thi Hong Do , Teng-Teeh Lim
{"title":"猪粪与厨余油共消化的协同效应及动力学评价","authors":"Cuong Manh Duong ,&nbsp;Thu Thi Hong Do ,&nbsp;Teng-Teeh Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While different biomass sources were commonly used in biogas systems, the synergistic effect was controversial, and the variety of models and criteria made it difficult to determine a best-fit equation. In this study, the evaluation of synergistic benefits and kinetic parameters was performed in a batch study fed by swine manure (SM) and waste kitchen oil (WKO) with four treatments (M4 (4 g-VS<sub>SM</sub>/L), M4F1, M4F2, and F2 (2 g-VS<sub>WKO</sub>/L)) and the control. The addition of WKO significantly increased the biogas yield (up to 1527±131 mL/g-VS), compared to 827 ± 109 mL/g-VS of SM mono-digestion, due to the higher biogas potential of WKO than that of SM. However, the co-digestion performance index (CPI) and linear relationship indicated no synergistic benefit. The kinetic analysis showed that the oily material had a longer lag phase (up to 0.65 d) compared to SM, indicating the necessity of combining the two substrates for system optimization. Four kinetic models exhibited high accuracy, and the Cone equation showed a better result on the longer lag-phase treatment. The high correlations between the AIC and BIC (R<sup>2</sup>=1), or MAPE and RMSE (R<sup>2</sup>=0.997), demonstrated the consistency between those parameters. The study revealed the consistency of CPI and linear regression to determine synergistic benefits, and kinetic parameters to evaluate the simulated models in AD systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 107092"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic effect and kinetic evaluation of swine manure and waste kitchen oil co-digestion\",\"authors\":\"Cuong Manh Duong ,&nbsp;Thu Thi Hong Do ,&nbsp;Teng-Teeh Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While different biomass sources were commonly used in biogas systems, the synergistic effect was controversial, and the variety of models and criteria made it difficult to determine a best-fit equation. In this study, the evaluation of synergistic benefits and kinetic parameters was performed in a batch study fed by swine manure (SM) and waste kitchen oil (WKO) with four treatments (M4 (4 g-VS<sub>SM</sub>/L), M4F1, M4F2, and F2 (2 g-VS<sub>WKO</sub>/L)) and the control. The addition of WKO significantly increased the biogas yield (up to 1527±131 mL/g-VS), compared to 827 ± 109 mL/g-VS of SM mono-digestion, due to the higher biogas potential of WKO than that of SM. However, the co-digestion performance index (CPI) and linear relationship indicated no synergistic benefit. The kinetic analysis showed that the oily material had a longer lag phase (up to 0.65 d) compared to SM, indicating the necessity of combining the two substrates for system optimization. Four kinetic models exhibited high accuracy, and the Cone equation showed a better result on the longer lag-phase treatment. The high correlations between the AIC and BIC (R<sup>2</sup>=1), or MAPE and RMSE (R<sup>2</sup>=0.997), demonstrated the consistency between those parameters. The study revealed the consistency of CPI and linear regression to determine synergistic benefits, and kinetic parameters to evaluate the simulated models in AD systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Engineering\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025031470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025031470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然沼气系统中通常使用不同的生物质来源,但其协同效应存在争议,并且模型和标准的多样性使得难以确定最佳拟合方程。以猪粪(SM)和厨余废油(WKO)为原料,采用M4 (4 g-VSSM/L)、M4F1、M4F2和F2 (2 g-VSWKO/L) 4种处理和对照,对协同效应和动力学参数进行了评价。与SM单消化的827±109 mL/g-VS相比,WKO的添加显著提高了沼气产量(高达1527±131 mL/g-VS),这是由于WKO的沼气潜力高于SM。然而,共消化性能指数(CPI)和线性关系没有显示协同效益。动力学分析表明,与SM相比,油性材料具有更长的滞后期(高达0.65 d),这表明需要将两种基质结合起来进行系统优化。四种动力学模型均具有较高的精度,其中锥方程对较长滞后相处理效果较好。AIC与BIC (R2=1)、MAPE与RMSE (R2=0.997)的高度相关说明了这些参数之间的一致性。该研究揭示了CPI和线性回归的一致性,以确定协同效益,以及动力学参数来评估AD系统中的模拟模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergistic effect and kinetic evaluation of swine manure and waste kitchen oil co-digestion
While different biomass sources were commonly used in biogas systems, the synergistic effect was controversial, and the variety of models and criteria made it difficult to determine a best-fit equation. In this study, the evaluation of synergistic benefits and kinetic parameters was performed in a batch study fed by swine manure (SM) and waste kitchen oil (WKO) with four treatments (M4 (4 g-VSSM/L), M4F1, M4F2, and F2 (2 g-VSWKO/L)) and the control. The addition of WKO significantly increased the biogas yield (up to 1527±131 mL/g-VS), compared to 827 ± 109 mL/g-VS of SM mono-digestion, due to the higher biogas potential of WKO than that of SM. However, the co-digestion performance index (CPI) and linear relationship indicated no synergistic benefit. The kinetic analysis showed that the oily material had a longer lag phase (up to 0.65 d) compared to SM, indicating the necessity of combining the two substrates for system optimization. Four kinetic models exhibited high accuracy, and the Cone equation showed a better result on the longer lag-phase treatment. The high correlations between the AIC and BIC (R2=1), or MAPE and RMSE (R2=0.997), demonstrated the consistency between those parameters. The study revealed the consistency of CPI and linear regression to determine synergistic benefits, and kinetic parameters to evaluate the simulated models in AD systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信