Flávio Eduardo da Silva de Carvalho , Felipe de Oliveira Salle , Karen Apellanis Borges , Karine Batista Machado de Carvalho , Thales Quedi Furian , Carlos Tadeu Pippi Salle
{"title":"基于人工神经网络的家禽屠宰场胴体谴责预测","authors":"Flávio Eduardo da Silva de Carvalho , Felipe de Oliveira Salle , Karen Apellanis Borges , Karine Batista Machado de Carvalho , Thales Quedi Furian , Carlos Tadeu Pippi Salle","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Challenges related to carcass quality and high condemnation rates result in significant economic losses. Also, the rigorous inspection of broiler carcasses is essential to ensure sanitary standards and food safety in industrial poultry production. To enhance traditional inspection methods, this study evaluated the use of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict conditions and condemnations in broiler chickens. Data from 3370 flocks inspected at a poultry company in southern Brazil between 2019 and 2022 were analyzed and 16 output variables were modeled using NeuroShell Predictor software. Nine models (56.25 %) were classified as good or excellent, with the models for “partial and total condemnation” presenting coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) > 0.93 and correlation coefficients close to 0.96, reflecting strong predictive performance and consistency between the predicted and actual values. Conditions involving more complex visual diagnoses such as cachexia, ascites, and cellulitis resulted in less accurate models. These findings suggest that ANNs can be useful tools to support postmortem inspection, reducing economic losses and improving the efficiency and sustainability of the poultry production chain. Nonetheless, because the data were sourced from a single production system, model applicability is limited to this context. Further studies using external datasets from other companies are recommended to assess model generalization under different production conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105884"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carcass condemnation prediction using artificial neural networks in poultry slaughterhouses\",\"authors\":\"Flávio Eduardo da Silva de Carvalho , Felipe de Oliveira Salle , Karen Apellanis Borges , Karine Batista Machado de Carvalho , Thales Quedi Furian , Carlos Tadeu Pippi Salle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Challenges related to carcass quality and high condemnation rates result in significant economic losses. Also, the rigorous inspection of broiler carcasses is essential to ensure sanitary standards and food safety in industrial poultry production. To enhance traditional inspection methods, this study evaluated the use of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict conditions and condemnations in broiler chickens. Data from 3370 flocks inspected at a poultry company in southern Brazil between 2019 and 2022 were analyzed and 16 output variables were modeled using NeuroShell Predictor software. Nine models (56.25 %) were classified as good or excellent, with the models for “partial and total condemnation” presenting coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) > 0.93 and correlation coefficients close to 0.96, reflecting strong predictive performance and consistency between the predicted and actual values. Conditions involving more complex visual diagnoses such as cachexia, ascites, and cellulitis resulted in less accurate models. These findings suggest that ANNs can be useful tools to support postmortem inspection, reducing economic losses and improving the efficiency and sustainability of the poultry production chain. Nonetheless, because the data were sourced from a single production system, model applicability is limited to this context. Further studies using external datasets from other companies are recommended to assess model generalization under different production conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825003583\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825003583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carcass condemnation prediction using artificial neural networks in poultry slaughterhouses
Challenges related to carcass quality and high condemnation rates result in significant economic losses. Also, the rigorous inspection of broiler carcasses is essential to ensure sanitary standards and food safety in industrial poultry production. To enhance traditional inspection methods, this study evaluated the use of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict conditions and condemnations in broiler chickens. Data from 3370 flocks inspected at a poultry company in southern Brazil between 2019 and 2022 were analyzed and 16 output variables were modeled using NeuroShell Predictor software. Nine models (56.25 %) were classified as good or excellent, with the models for “partial and total condemnation” presenting coefficients of determination (R2) > 0.93 and correlation coefficients close to 0.96, reflecting strong predictive performance and consistency between the predicted and actual values. Conditions involving more complex visual diagnoses such as cachexia, ascites, and cellulitis resulted in less accurate models. These findings suggest that ANNs can be useful tools to support postmortem inspection, reducing economic losses and improving the efficiency and sustainability of the poultry production chain. Nonetheless, because the data were sourced from a single production system, model applicability is limited to this context. Further studies using external datasets from other companies are recommended to assess model generalization under different production conditions.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.