Amy Gorman , Mark Becker , Clair Baldock , Stephanie Moore , Alexander P. Golovanov
{"title":"研究螯合剂、表面活性剂和镁离子对LPS聚集体大小的影响,这些聚集体在鲎细胞裂解液检测中引起低内毒素回收率","authors":"Amy Gorman , Mark Becker , Clair Baldock , Stephanie Moore , Alexander P. Golovanov","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpb.2025.114861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To ensure safety, pharmaceuticals are rigorously tested for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination, as this can trigger severe immune reactions in patients. Low Endotoxin Recovery (LER), describing the masking of spiked LPS controls in Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assays, has been associated with the presence of chelating agents and surfactants in pharmaceutical formulations. The addition of excipients, such as Mg<sup>2+</sup>, have shown the ability to mitigate the effects of LER, however, inconsistencies in various studies regarding the influence of the excipients on LPS aggregate characteristics and LER occurrence hinder a clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying LER. In this study, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were employed to systematically assess the impact of chelating agents, surfactants, and divalent cations on the size and shape of LPS aggregates across various formulations. Our results indicate that surfactant-only formulations generally reduce LPS aggregate size, whereas chelating agent-only formulations do not. Notably, the smallest aggregates were observed when both chelating agents and surfactants were present, with the extent of size reduction being specific to the particular excipients used. Additionally, Mg<sup>2+</sup> generally inhibited the excipients’ capacity to decrease aggregate size, most effectively in phosphate-containing samples. Despite these variations in size, the overall aggregate shape remained largely unchanged in all formulations. These findings suggest that LPS aggregate size or shape does not distinguish formulations causing LER; instead, factors such as the characteristics of the LPS aggregate surface in different formulations should be explored in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12024,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 114861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the effects of chelating agents, surfactants and magnesium cations on the size of LPS aggregates in formulations causing low endotoxin recovery in limulus amebocyte lysate assays\",\"authors\":\"Amy Gorman , Mark Becker , Clair Baldock , Stephanie Moore , Alexander P. Golovanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpb.2025.114861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To ensure safety, pharmaceuticals are rigorously tested for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination, as this can trigger severe immune reactions in patients. Low Endotoxin Recovery (LER), describing the masking of spiked LPS controls in Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assays, has been associated with the presence of chelating agents and surfactants in pharmaceutical formulations. The addition of excipients, such as Mg<sup>2+</sup>, have shown the ability to mitigate the effects of LER, however, inconsistencies in various studies regarding the influence of the excipients on LPS aggregate characteristics and LER occurrence hinder a clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying LER. In this study, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were employed to systematically assess the impact of chelating agents, surfactants, and divalent cations on the size and shape of LPS aggregates across various formulations. Our results indicate that surfactant-only formulations generally reduce LPS aggregate size, whereas chelating agent-only formulations do not. Notably, the smallest aggregates were observed when both chelating agents and surfactants were present, with the extent of size reduction being specific to the particular excipients used. Additionally, Mg<sup>2+</sup> generally inhibited the excipients’ capacity to decrease aggregate size, most effectively in phosphate-containing samples. Despite these variations in size, the overall aggregate shape remained largely unchanged in all formulations. These findings suggest that LPS aggregate size or shape does not distinguish formulations causing LER; instead, factors such as the characteristics of the LPS aggregate surface in different formulations should be explored in the future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641125002383\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641125002383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the effects of chelating agents, surfactants and magnesium cations on the size of LPS aggregates in formulations causing low endotoxin recovery in limulus amebocyte lysate assays
To ensure safety, pharmaceuticals are rigorously tested for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination, as this can trigger severe immune reactions in patients. Low Endotoxin Recovery (LER), describing the masking of spiked LPS controls in Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assays, has been associated with the presence of chelating agents and surfactants in pharmaceutical formulations. The addition of excipients, such as Mg2+, have shown the ability to mitigate the effects of LER, however, inconsistencies in various studies regarding the influence of the excipients on LPS aggregate characteristics and LER occurrence hinder a clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying LER. In this study, dynamic light scattering (DLS) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) were employed to systematically assess the impact of chelating agents, surfactants, and divalent cations on the size and shape of LPS aggregates across various formulations. Our results indicate that surfactant-only formulations generally reduce LPS aggregate size, whereas chelating agent-only formulations do not. Notably, the smallest aggregates were observed when both chelating agents and surfactants were present, with the extent of size reduction being specific to the particular excipients used. Additionally, Mg2+ generally inhibited the excipients’ capacity to decrease aggregate size, most effectively in phosphate-containing samples. Despite these variations in size, the overall aggregate shape remained largely unchanged in all formulations. These findings suggest that LPS aggregate size or shape does not distinguish formulations causing LER; instead, factors such as the characteristics of the LPS aggregate surface in different formulations should be explored in the future.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics provides a medium for the publication of novel, innovative and hypothesis-driven research from the areas of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.
Topics covered include for example:
Design and development of drug delivery systems for pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals (small molecules, proteins, nucleic acids)
Aspects of manufacturing process design
Biomedical aspects of drug product design
Strategies and formulations for controlled drug transport across biological barriers
Physicochemical aspects of drug product development
Novel excipients for drug product design
Drug delivery and controlled release systems for systemic and local applications
Nanomaterials for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes
Advanced therapy medicinal products
Medical devices supporting a distinct pharmacological effect.