采用共享电动交通的障碍和解决方案:一种综合模糊- mcdm方法

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Janak Parmar , Paolo Delle Site , Dilum Dissanayake
{"title":"采用共享电动交通的障碍和解决方案:一种综合模糊- mcdm方法","authors":"Janak Parmar ,&nbsp;Paolo Delle Site ,&nbsp;Dilum Dissanayake","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents an integrated fuzzy-MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) framework to identify and prioritise barriers to the adoption of Electric Vehicle Sharing Services (EVSS), and to rank the most effective policy solutions. The fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) is employed to determine the relative weights of barriers, while the fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), enhanced with Bonferroni mean operators, is used to rank policy solutions. A case study from the United Kingdom is used to validate the proposed framework. Findings highlight behavioural barriers (e.g., habits, perceived cost) as most critical, followed by policy and infrastructural barriers. Key policy solutions include strategic financial investments, optimal station locations, improved infrastructure, and public awareness campaigns. By simultaneously addressing multiple barriers and solutions trade-offs, the study underscores need for a coherent national framework and supportive policies, offering critical insights to promote shared electric mobility and sustainable urban transport. The main contribution of this study lies in offering a robust, adaptable decision-support framework for policymakers to systematically address EVSS adoption challenges. The study facilitates prioritising interventions and optimising resource allocation, thereby supporting the transition towards sustainable urban mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101502"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and solutions for adopting shared electric mobility: An integrated fuzzy-MCDM approach\",\"authors\":\"Janak Parmar ,&nbsp;Paolo Delle Site ,&nbsp;Dilum Dissanayake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents an integrated fuzzy-MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) framework to identify and prioritise barriers to the adoption of Electric Vehicle Sharing Services (EVSS), and to rank the most effective policy solutions. The fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) is employed to determine the relative weights of barriers, while the fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), enhanced with Bonferroni mean operators, is used to rank policy solutions. A case study from the United Kingdom is used to validate the proposed framework. Findings highlight behavioural barriers (e.g., habits, perceived cost) as most critical, followed by policy and infrastructural barriers. Key policy solutions include strategic financial investments, optimal station locations, improved infrastructure, and public awareness campaigns. By simultaneously addressing multiple barriers and solutions trade-offs, the study underscores need for a coherent national framework and supportive policies, offering critical insights to promote shared electric mobility and sustainable urban transport. The main contribution of this study lies in offering a robust, adaptable decision-support framework for policymakers to systematically address EVSS adoption challenges. The study facilitates prioritising interventions and optimising resource allocation, thereby supporting the transition towards sustainable urban mobility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525002172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525002172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个集成的模糊- mcdm(多准则决策)框架,以识别和优先考虑采用电动汽车共享服务(EVSS)的障碍,并对最有效的政策解决方案进行排名。采用模糊最佳-最差法(BWM)确定障碍的相对权重,采用Bonferroni均值算子增强的模糊组合妥协解(CoCoSo)对策略方案进行排序。一个来自英国的案例研究被用来验证提议的框架。调查结果强调,行为障碍(如习惯、感知成本)是最关键的,其次是政策和基础设施障碍。关键的政策解决方案包括战略性金融投资、优化车站位置、改善基础设施和提高公众意识。通过同时解决多种障碍和解决方案的权衡,该研究强调需要一个连贯的国家框架和支持性政策,为促进共享电动交通和可持续城市交通提供重要见解。本研究的主要贡献在于为决策者提供了一个强大的、适应性强的决策支持框架,以系统地解决EVSS采用的挑战。该研究促进了干预措施的优先排序和资源分配的优化,从而支持向可持续城市交通的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and solutions for adopting shared electric mobility: An integrated fuzzy-MCDM approach
This paper presents an integrated fuzzy-MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) framework to identify and prioritise barriers to the adoption of Electric Vehicle Sharing Services (EVSS), and to rank the most effective policy solutions. The fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) is employed to determine the relative weights of barriers, while the fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), enhanced with Bonferroni mean operators, is used to rank policy solutions. A case study from the United Kingdom is used to validate the proposed framework. Findings highlight behavioural barriers (e.g., habits, perceived cost) as most critical, followed by policy and infrastructural barriers. Key policy solutions include strategic financial investments, optimal station locations, improved infrastructure, and public awareness campaigns. By simultaneously addressing multiple barriers and solutions trade-offs, the study underscores need for a coherent national framework and supportive policies, offering critical insights to promote shared electric mobility and sustainable urban transport. The main contribution of this study lies in offering a robust, adaptable decision-support framework for policymakers to systematically address EVSS adoption challenges. The study facilitates prioritising interventions and optimising resource allocation, thereby supporting the transition towards sustainable urban mobility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信