Janak Parmar , Paolo Delle Site , Dilum Dissanayake
{"title":"采用共享电动交通的障碍和解决方案:一种综合模糊- mcdm方法","authors":"Janak Parmar , Paolo Delle Site , Dilum Dissanayake","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents an integrated fuzzy-MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) framework to identify and prioritise barriers to the adoption of Electric Vehicle Sharing Services (EVSS), and to rank the most effective policy solutions. The fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) is employed to determine the relative weights of barriers, while the fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), enhanced with Bonferroni mean operators, is used to rank policy solutions. A case study from the United Kingdom is used to validate the proposed framework. Findings highlight behavioural barriers (e.g., habits, perceived cost) as most critical, followed by policy and infrastructural barriers. Key policy solutions include strategic financial investments, optimal station locations, improved infrastructure, and public awareness campaigns. By simultaneously addressing multiple barriers and solutions trade-offs, the study underscores need for a coherent national framework and supportive policies, offering critical insights to promote shared electric mobility and sustainable urban transport. The main contribution of this study lies in offering a robust, adaptable decision-support framework for policymakers to systematically address EVSS adoption challenges. The study facilitates prioritising interventions and optimising resource allocation, thereby supporting the transition towards sustainable urban mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101502"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and solutions for adopting shared electric mobility: An integrated fuzzy-MCDM approach\",\"authors\":\"Janak Parmar , Paolo Delle Site , Dilum Dissanayake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents an integrated fuzzy-MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) framework to identify and prioritise barriers to the adoption of Electric Vehicle Sharing Services (EVSS), and to rank the most effective policy solutions. The fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) is employed to determine the relative weights of barriers, while the fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), enhanced with Bonferroni mean operators, is used to rank policy solutions. A case study from the United Kingdom is used to validate the proposed framework. Findings highlight behavioural barriers (e.g., habits, perceived cost) as most critical, followed by policy and infrastructural barriers. Key policy solutions include strategic financial investments, optimal station locations, improved infrastructure, and public awareness campaigns. By simultaneously addressing multiple barriers and solutions trade-offs, the study underscores need for a coherent national framework and supportive policies, offering critical insights to promote shared electric mobility and sustainable urban transport. The main contribution of this study lies in offering a robust, adaptable decision-support framework for policymakers to systematically address EVSS adoption challenges. The study facilitates prioritising interventions and optimising resource allocation, thereby supporting the transition towards sustainable urban mobility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525002172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525002172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Barriers and solutions for adopting shared electric mobility: An integrated fuzzy-MCDM approach
This paper presents an integrated fuzzy-MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) framework to identify and prioritise barriers to the adoption of Electric Vehicle Sharing Services (EVSS), and to rank the most effective policy solutions. The fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) is employed to determine the relative weights of barriers, while the fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo), enhanced with Bonferroni mean operators, is used to rank policy solutions. A case study from the United Kingdom is used to validate the proposed framework. Findings highlight behavioural barriers (e.g., habits, perceived cost) as most critical, followed by policy and infrastructural barriers. Key policy solutions include strategic financial investments, optimal station locations, improved infrastructure, and public awareness campaigns. By simultaneously addressing multiple barriers and solutions trade-offs, the study underscores need for a coherent national framework and supportive policies, offering critical insights to promote shared electric mobility and sustainable urban transport. The main contribution of this study lies in offering a robust, adaptable decision-support framework for policymakers to systematically address EVSS adoption challenges. The study facilitates prioritising interventions and optimising resource allocation, thereby supporting the transition towards sustainable urban mobility.
期刊介绍:
Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector