{"title":"松针发电的技术经济与可持续性比较研究","authors":"Madhuka Roy , Sayon Chakravarty , Brij Kishore , Krishnendu Kundu","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) was conducted for a hypothetically scaled up system (1.5 ton per day) to compare these three pathways based on energy input, biofuel yield, and economic viability. The energy input for a 1.5 ton per day (TPD) biogas plant with physicochemical pretreatment and co-digestion was 2369 kW h/ton, generating 586 m<sup>3</sup> of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) daily. The 1.5 TPD pyrolysis plant working at 577 °C yields 405 kg bio-oil and 585 kg biochar with a total energy input of 7846 kW h per ton of feedstock. The 1.5 TPD torrefaction plant, at 350 °C for 60 min, generates 829 kg of briquettes requiring input energy of 8814 kW h per ton of biomass. Economic analysis indicates that anaerobic digestion achieved a profit of INR 115.28 lakh per annum with a production cost of INR 30/m<sup>3</sup>, and a payback period of 1.29 years, while pyrolysis and torrefaction exhibited profits of INR 51.64 lakh and INR 26.83 lakh yearly, with a production cost of INR 62.56/kg and INR 13.33/kg having corresponding payback in 1.45 and 2.92 years, respectively. Profitability metrics and cost distribution highlight that feedstock cost, energy consumption, and product market prices significantly influence profitability. Among the three pathways, anaerobic digestion is the most economically viable option, with a Return on Investment (ROI) of 68.56 %. This study emphasizes the need of TEA for commercial scalability based on the data of lab scale and bench scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 108359"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on pine needle-based energy generation: Perspectives on techno-economics and sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Madhuka Roy , Sayon Chakravarty , Brij Kishore , Krishnendu Kundu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) was conducted for a hypothetically scaled up system (1.5 ton per day) to compare these three pathways based on energy input, biofuel yield, and economic viability. The energy input for a 1.5 ton per day (TPD) biogas plant with physicochemical pretreatment and co-digestion was 2369 kW h/ton, generating 586 m<sup>3</sup> of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) daily. The 1.5 TPD pyrolysis plant working at 577 °C yields 405 kg bio-oil and 585 kg biochar with a total energy input of 7846 kW h per ton of feedstock. The 1.5 TPD torrefaction plant, at 350 °C for 60 min, generates 829 kg of briquettes requiring input energy of 8814 kW h per ton of biomass. Economic analysis indicates that anaerobic digestion achieved a profit of INR 115.28 lakh per annum with a production cost of INR 30/m<sup>3</sup>, and a payback period of 1.29 years, while pyrolysis and torrefaction exhibited profits of INR 51.64 lakh and INR 26.83 lakh yearly, with a production cost of INR 62.56/kg and INR 13.33/kg having corresponding payback in 1.45 and 2.92 years, respectively. Profitability metrics and cost distribution highlight that feedstock cost, energy consumption, and product market prices significantly influence profitability. Among the three pathways, anaerobic digestion is the most economically viable option, with a Return on Investment (ROI) of 68.56 %. This study emphasizes the need of TEA for commercial scalability based on the data of lab scale and bench scale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425007706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425007706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study on pine needle-based energy generation: Perspectives on techno-economics and sustainability
A comprehensive techno-economic analysis (TEA) was conducted for a hypothetically scaled up system (1.5 ton per day) to compare these three pathways based on energy input, biofuel yield, and economic viability. The energy input for a 1.5 ton per day (TPD) biogas plant with physicochemical pretreatment and co-digestion was 2369 kW h/ton, generating 586 m3 of methane (CH4) daily. The 1.5 TPD pyrolysis plant working at 577 °C yields 405 kg bio-oil and 585 kg biochar with a total energy input of 7846 kW h per ton of feedstock. The 1.5 TPD torrefaction plant, at 350 °C for 60 min, generates 829 kg of briquettes requiring input energy of 8814 kW h per ton of biomass. Economic analysis indicates that anaerobic digestion achieved a profit of INR 115.28 lakh per annum with a production cost of INR 30/m3, and a payback period of 1.29 years, while pyrolysis and torrefaction exhibited profits of INR 51.64 lakh and INR 26.83 lakh yearly, with a production cost of INR 62.56/kg and INR 13.33/kg having corresponding payback in 1.45 and 2.92 years, respectively. Profitability metrics and cost distribution highlight that feedstock cost, energy consumption, and product market prices significantly influence profitability. Among the three pathways, anaerobic digestion is the most economically viable option, with a Return on Investment (ROI) of 68.56 %. This study emphasizes the need of TEA for commercial scalability based on the data of lab scale and bench scale.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.