探讨胃充盈超声、胃镜检查及其联合应用在胃癌术前诊断中的比较效果

IF 2.5 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yanyan Ma , Danyang Song , Bo Wang , Qianshi Zhang , Zhanyu Wang , Mi Tian
{"title":"探讨胃充盈超声、胃镜检查及其联合应用在胃癌术前诊断中的比较效果","authors":"Yanyan Ma ,&nbsp;Danyang Song ,&nbsp;Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Qianshi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhanyu Wang ,&nbsp;Mi Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the comparative effectiveness of gastric filling ultrasound (GFUS), gastroscopy, and their combined use for preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was a single-center, retrospective, comparative analysis conducted. A total of 279 patients be suspected of having gastric cancer were included. All patients were conducted preoperative gastroscopy and full gastric ultrasound examinations. These subjects were categorized into a gastric cancer group (n = 135) and a control group (n = 144) based on the pathological diagnostic results from gastroscopy biopsy sample or intraoperative sample.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Gastric endoscopy demonstrates a sensitivity of 91.85 %, specificity of 94.44 %, and an overall accuracy of 93.19 %. Gastric full ultrasonography exhibits a sensitivity of 85.93 % and specificity of 92.36 %, and an overall accuracy of 89.25 %. Combined approach emerges as the most effective diagnostic strategy, boasting a sensitivity of 98.52 %, specificity of 98.61 %, and an outstanding overall accuracy of 98.57 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The integrated use of GFUS and gastroscopy offers superior diagnostic accuracy and efficiency compared to their individual use. Embracing the combined approach has the potential to enhance the diagnostic pathway for gastric cancer patients, contributing to improved clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. This approach may facilitate earlier detection and more accurate staging of gastric cancer, thereby enabling timely and personalized treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"18 4","pages":"Article 101941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the comparative effectiveness of gastric filling ultrasound, gastroscopy, and their combined use for diagnosing gastric cancer before surgery\",\"authors\":\"Yanyan Ma ,&nbsp;Danyang Song ,&nbsp;Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Qianshi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhanyu Wang ,&nbsp;Mi Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the comparative effectiveness of gastric filling ultrasound (GFUS), gastroscopy, and their combined use for preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was a single-center, retrospective, comparative analysis conducted. A total of 279 patients be suspected of having gastric cancer were included. All patients were conducted preoperative gastroscopy and full gastric ultrasound examinations. These subjects were categorized into a gastric cancer group (n = 135) and a control group (n = 144) based on the pathological diagnostic results from gastroscopy biopsy sample or intraoperative sample.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Gastric endoscopy demonstrates a sensitivity of 91.85 %, specificity of 94.44 %, and an overall accuracy of 93.19 %. Gastric full ultrasonography exhibits a sensitivity of 85.93 % and specificity of 92.36 %, and an overall accuracy of 89.25 %. Combined approach emerges as the most effective diagnostic strategy, boasting a sensitivity of 98.52 %, specificity of 98.61 %, and an outstanding overall accuracy of 98.57 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The integrated use of GFUS and gastroscopy offers superior diagnostic accuracy and efficiency compared to their individual use. Embracing the combined approach has the potential to enhance the diagnostic pathway for gastric cancer patients, contributing to improved clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. This approach may facilitate earlier detection and more accurate staging of gastric cancer, thereby enabling timely and personalized treatment strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850725006533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850725006533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的回顾性分析胃充盈超声(GFUS)与胃镜检查及其联合应用在胃癌术前诊断中的比较效果。方法采用单中心、回顾性、比较分析方法。共纳入279例疑似胃癌患者。术前均行胃镜检查及全胃超声检查。根据胃镜活检标本或术中标本病理诊断结果将患者分为胃癌组(n = 135)和对照组(n = 144)。结果胃镜检查的敏感性为91.85%,特异性为94.44%,总体准确率为93.19%。胃全超声检查灵敏度85.93%,特异度92.36%,总体准确率89.25%。联合方法是最有效的诊断策略,其灵敏度为98.52%,特异性为98.61%,总体准确率为98.57%。结论综合使用GFUS和胃镜检查比单独使用具有更高的诊断准确性和效率。采用联合方法有可能增强胃癌患者的诊断途径,有助于改善临床决策和患者预后。这种方法可以促进胃癌的早期发现和更准确的分期,从而实现及时和个性化的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the comparative effectiveness of gastric filling ultrasound, gastroscopy, and their combined use for diagnosing gastric cancer before surgery

Purpose

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the comparative effectiveness of gastric filling ultrasound (GFUS), gastroscopy, and their combined use for preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Methods

This study was a single-center, retrospective, comparative analysis conducted. A total of 279 patients be suspected of having gastric cancer were included. All patients were conducted preoperative gastroscopy and full gastric ultrasound examinations. These subjects were categorized into a gastric cancer group (n = 135) and a control group (n = 144) based on the pathological diagnostic results from gastroscopy biopsy sample or intraoperative sample.

Results

Gastric endoscopy demonstrates a sensitivity of 91.85 %, specificity of 94.44 %, and an overall accuracy of 93.19 %. Gastric full ultrasonography exhibits a sensitivity of 85.93 % and specificity of 92.36 %, and an overall accuracy of 89.25 %. Combined approach emerges as the most effective diagnostic strategy, boasting a sensitivity of 98.52 %, specificity of 98.61 %, and an outstanding overall accuracy of 98.57 %.

Conclusion

The integrated use of GFUS and gastroscopy offers superior diagnostic accuracy and efficiency compared to their individual use. Embracing the combined approach has the potential to enhance the diagnostic pathway for gastric cancer patients, contributing to improved clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. This approach may facilitate earlier detection and more accurate staging of gastric cancer, thereby enabling timely and personalized treatment strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信