测量ICD-11分离性身份障碍:国际分离性身份障碍问卷的跨文化验证

IF 4.5 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hong Wang Fung , Anson Kai Chun Chau , Colin A. Ross , Vedat Şar , Görkem Derin , Aslı Dila Akiş , Henry Tak Shing Chiu , Audrey Zatopek , Grace Wing Ka Ho
{"title":"测量ICD-11分离性身份障碍:国际分离性身份障碍问卷的跨文化验证","authors":"Hong Wang Fung ,&nbsp;Anson Kai Chun Chau ,&nbsp;Colin A. Ross ,&nbsp;Vedat Şar ,&nbsp;Görkem Derin ,&nbsp;Aslı Dila Akiş ,&nbsp;Henry Tak Shing Chiu ,&nbsp;Audrey Zatopek ,&nbsp;Grace Wing Ka Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, the ICD-11 has updated the diagnostic requirements for dissociative identity disorder (DID) and introduced partial DID as a new diagnosis. This study validated the first measure of DID and partial DID as defined in ICD-11. Two convenience samples of mental health service users (118 Chinese speakers and 115 English speakers) completed the International Dissociative Identity Disorder Questionnaire (IDIDQ), the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Taxon (DES-T), and the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI) in their respective language. The IDIDQ had good to excellent internal consistency (α =.861 to.892) and test-retest reliability (ICC =.682 to.854, p &lt; .001) in both samples. The 3-factor structure of DID (i.e., amnesia, dissociative identities, and switching), as proposed in ICD-11, was supported by our cross-cultural data, with configural, metric and scalar invariance established across the Chinese- and English-speaking samples. The IDIDQ reliably detected probable ICD-11 DID and partial DID (κ =.517 to.781, p &lt; .001) during a one-week test-retest period. The IDIDQ subscales were strongly correlated with the respective MDI subscales and the DES-T scores. The IDIDQ results had moderate to substantial agreement with the MDI Identity Dissociation subscale and the DES-T in both samples (κ =.514 to.741, p &lt; .001). This study provides first evidence showing the ICD-11 DID and partial DID can be reliably and validly measured using the IDIDQ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 104685"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring ICD-11 dissociative identity disorder: Cross-cultural validation of the international dissociative identity disorder questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Hong Wang Fung ,&nbsp;Anson Kai Chun Chau ,&nbsp;Colin A. Ross ,&nbsp;Vedat Şar ,&nbsp;Görkem Derin ,&nbsp;Aslı Dila Akiş ,&nbsp;Henry Tak Shing Chiu ,&nbsp;Audrey Zatopek ,&nbsp;Grace Wing Ka Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recently, the ICD-11 has updated the diagnostic requirements for dissociative identity disorder (DID) and introduced partial DID as a new diagnosis. This study validated the first measure of DID and partial DID as defined in ICD-11. Two convenience samples of mental health service users (118 Chinese speakers and 115 English speakers) completed the International Dissociative Identity Disorder Questionnaire (IDIDQ), the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Taxon (DES-T), and the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI) in their respective language. The IDIDQ had good to excellent internal consistency (α =.861 to.892) and test-retest reliability (ICC =.682 to.854, p &lt; .001) in both samples. The 3-factor structure of DID (i.e., amnesia, dissociative identities, and switching), as proposed in ICD-11, was supported by our cross-cultural data, with configural, metric and scalar invariance established across the Chinese- and English-speaking samples. The IDIDQ reliably detected probable ICD-11 DID and partial DID (κ =.517 to.781, p &lt; .001) during a one-week test-retest period. The IDIDQ subscales were strongly correlated with the respective MDI subscales and the DES-T scores. The IDIDQ results had moderate to substantial agreement with the MDI Identity Dissociation subscale and the DES-T in both samples (κ =.514 to.741, p &lt; .001). This study provides first evidence showing the ICD-11 DID and partial DID can be reliably and validly measured using the IDIDQ.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825003284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825003284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,ICD-11更新了分离性身份识别障碍(DID)的诊断要求,并将部分DID作为一种新的诊断。本研究验证了ICD-11中定义的DID和部分DID的第一种测量方法。两个便利样本(118名中文使用者和115名英文使用者)分别用各自的语言完成了国际分离性身份认同障碍问卷(IDIDQ)、分离体验量表-分类单元(DES-T)和多量表分离量表(MDI)。iddq具有良好至优异的内部一致性(α =.861 ~。892)和重测信度(ICC =.682至。854, p & lt; 。001)。我们的跨文化数据支持了ICD-11中提出的DID的三因素结构(即健忘症、分离身份和转换),在汉语和英语样本中建立了结构、度量和标量不变性。IDIDQ可靠地检测到可能的ICD-11 DID和部分DID (κ =.517 to)。781, p & lt; 。001)在为期一周的复试期间。iddq子量表与MDI子量表和DES-T评分呈强相关。iddq结果与两个样本的MDI身份解离亚量表和DES-T有中等到基本的一致(κ =.514至。741, p & lt; 措施)。本研究提供了第一个证据,表明ICD-11 DID和部分DID可以使用IDIDQ可靠有效地测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring ICD-11 dissociative identity disorder: Cross-cultural validation of the international dissociative identity disorder questionnaire
Recently, the ICD-11 has updated the diagnostic requirements for dissociative identity disorder (DID) and introduced partial DID as a new diagnosis. This study validated the first measure of DID and partial DID as defined in ICD-11. Two convenience samples of mental health service users (118 Chinese speakers and 115 English speakers) completed the International Dissociative Identity Disorder Questionnaire (IDIDQ), the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Taxon (DES-T), and the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI) in their respective language. The IDIDQ had good to excellent internal consistency (α =.861 to.892) and test-retest reliability (ICC =.682 to.854, p < .001) in both samples. The 3-factor structure of DID (i.e., amnesia, dissociative identities, and switching), as proposed in ICD-11, was supported by our cross-cultural data, with configural, metric and scalar invariance established across the Chinese- and English-speaking samples. The IDIDQ reliably detected probable ICD-11 DID and partial DID (κ =.517 to.781, p < .001) during a one-week test-retest period. The IDIDQ subscales were strongly correlated with the respective MDI subscales and the DES-T scores. The IDIDQ results had moderate to substantial agreement with the MDI Identity Dissociation subscale and the DES-T in both samples (κ =.514 to.741, p < .001). This study provides first evidence showing the ICD-11 DID and partial DID can be reliably and validly measured using the IDIDQ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信