Jaidyn K. Charlton , Beth Visser , Angela MacIsaac , Aislin R. Mushquash
{"title":"黑暗,情绪化和回避:对黑暗四分人格和日常应对的深入纵向调查","authors":"Jaidyn K. Charlton , Beth Visser , Angela MacIsaac , Aislin R. Mushquash","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coping consists of both adaptive and maladaptive methods for dealing with stressors or their associated emotional responses. The Dark Tetrad describes a cluster of subclinical and socially aversive personality traits (psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and everyday sadism). Although research has examined how individuals higher in Dark Tetrad traits perceive and experience stress, there is a lack of research examining how they cope with stress. Of the minimal literature that does exist examining Dark Tetrad coping, there are noteworthy methodological limitations. The current study investigated associations between the Dark Tetrad and coping with daily stressors among undergraduate students (<em>n</em> = 359) using an intensive longitudinal (daily diary) design. Participants completed a survey each day for 14-days. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that individuals higher in psychopathy and everyday sadism endorsed more emotion-focused and avoidant coping, whereas, those higher in narcissism endorsed a combination of all types of coping. Machiavellianism was linked only with avoidant coping. Findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the preferred coping methods and stress responses of those with darker personalities within average daily contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dark, emotional, and avoidant: An intensive longitudinal investigation of the Dark Tetrad and daily coping\",\"authors\":\"Jaidyn K. Charlton , Beth Visser , Angela MacIsaac , Aislin R. Mushquash\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coping consists of both adaptive and maladaptive methods for dealing with stressors or their associated emotional responses. The Dark Tetrad describes a cluster of subclinical and socially aversive personality traits (psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and everyday sadism). Although research has examined how individuals higher in Dark Tetrad traits perceive and experience stress, there is a lack of research examining how they cope with stress. Of the minimal literature that does exist examining Dark Tetrad coping, there are noteworthy methodological limitations. The current study investigated associations between the Dark Tetrad and coping with daily stressors among undergraduate students (<em>n</em> = 359) using an intensive longitudinal (daily diary) design. Participants completed a survey each day for 14-days. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that individuals higher in psychopathy and everyday sadism endorsed more emotion-focused and avoidant coping, whereas, those higher in narcissism endorsed a combination of all types of coping. Machiavellianism was linked only with avoidant coping. Findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the preferred coping methods and stress responses of those with darker personalities within average daily contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dark, emotional, and avoidant: An intensive longitudinal investigation of the Dark Tetrad and daily coping
Coping consists of both adaptive and maladaptive methods for dealing with stressors or their associated emotional responses. The Dark Tetrad describes a cluster of subclinical and socially aversive personality traits (psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and everyday sadism). Although research has examined how individuals higher in Dark Tetrad traits perceive and experience stress, there is a lack of research examining how they cope with stress. Of the minimal literature that does exist examining Dark Tetrad coping, there are noteworthy methodological limitations. The current study investigated associations between the Dark Tetrad and coping with daily stressors among undergraduate students (n = 359) using an intensive longitudinal (daily diary) design. Participants completed a survey each day for 14-days. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that individuals higher in psychopathy and everyday sadism endorsed more emotion-focused and avoidant coping, whereas, those higher in narcissism endorsed a combination of all types of coping. Machiavellianism was linked only with avoidant coping. Findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the preferred coping methods and stress responses of those with darker personalities within average daily contexts.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.