黑暗,情绪化和回避:对黑暗四分人格和日常应对的深入纵向调查

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jaidyn K. Charlton , Beth Visser , Angela MacIsaac , Aislin R. Mushquash
{"title":"黑暗,情绪化和回避:对黑暗四分人格和日常应对的深入纵向调查","authors":"Jaidyn K. Charlton ,&nbsp;Beth Visser ,&nbsp;Angela MacIsaac ,&nbsp;Aislin R. Mushquash","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coping consists of both adaptive and maladaptive methods for dealing with stressors or their associated emotional responses. The Dark Tetrad describes a cluster of subclinical and socially aversive personality traits (psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and everyday sadism). Although research has examined how individuals higher in Dark Tetrad traits perceive and experience stress, there is a lack of research examining how they cope with stress. Of the minimal literature that does exist examining Dark Tetrad coping, there are noteworthy methodological limitations. The current study investigated associations between the Dark Tetrad and coping with daily stressors among undergraduate students (<em>n</em> = 359) using an intensive longitudinal (daily diary) design. Participants completed a survey each day for 14-days. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that individuals higher in psychopathy and everyday sadism endorsed more emotion-focused and avoidant coping, whereas, those higher in narcissism endorsed a combination of all types of coping. Machiavellianism was linked only with avoidant coping. Findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the preferred coping methods and stress responses of those with darker personalities within average daily contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dark, emotional, and avoidant: An intensive longitudinal investigation of the Dark Tetrad and daily coping\",\"authors\":\"Jaidyn K. Charlton ,&nbsp;Beth Visser ,&nbsp;Angela MacIsaac ,&nbsp;Aislin R. Mushquash\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coping consists of both adaptive and maladaptive methods for dealing with stressors or their associated emotional responses. The Dark Tetrad describes a cluster of subclinical and socially aversive personality traits (psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and everyday sadism). Although research has examined how individuals higher in Dark Tetrad traits perceive and experience stress, there is a lack of research examining how they cope with stress. Of the minimal literature that does exist examining Dark Tetrad coping, there are noteworthy methodological limitations. The current study investigated associations between the Dark Tetrad and coping with daily stressors among undergraduate students (<em>n</em> = 359) using an intensive longitudinal (daily diary) design. Participants completed a survey each day for 14-days. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that individuals higher in psychopathy and everyday sadism endorsed more emotion-focused and avoidant coping, whereas, those higher in narcissism endorsed a combination of all types of coping. Machiavellianism was linked only with avoidant coping. Findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the preferred coping methods and stress responses of those with darker personalities within average daily contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应对包括应对压力源或其相关情绪反应的适应和不适应方法。黑暗四人格描述了一系列亚临床和社会厌恶的人格特征(精神病、自恋、马基雅维利主义和日常虐待狂)。尽管研究已经研究了黑暗四分体特征较高的个体如何感知和体验压力,但缺乏研究他们如何应对压力。在现存的研究黑暗四分体应对的最小文献中,有值得注意的方法局限性。目前的研究使用密集的纵向(每日日记)设计调查了大学生(n = 359)黑暗四分体与应对日常压力源之间的关系。参与者每天完成一份调查,持续14天。多水平回归分析显示,精神变态和日常虐待狂程度较高的个体更倾向于情绪聚焦型和回避型应对,而自恋程度较高的个体则倾向于所有应对类型的组合。马基雅维利主义只与回避性应对有关。研究结果可以告诉研究人员和临床医生,在日常生活中,性格黑暗的人更喜欢的应对方法和压力反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dark, emotional, and avoidant: An intensive longitudinal investigation of the Dark Tetrad and daily coping
Coping consists of both adaptive and maladaptive methods for dealing with stressors or their associated emotional responses. The Dark Tetrad describes a cluster of subclinical and socially aversive personality traits (psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and everyday sadism). Although research has examined how individuals higher in Dark Tetrad traits perceive and experience stress, there is a lack of research examining how they cope with stress. Of the minimal literature that does exist examining Dark Tetrad coping, there are noteworthy methodological limitations. The current study investigated associations between the Dark Tetrad and coping with daily stressors among undergraduate students (n = 359) using an intensive longitudinal (daily diary) design. Participants completed a survey each day for 14-days. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that individuals higher in psychopathy and everyday sadism endorsed more emotion-focused and avoidant coping, whereas, those higher in narcissism endorsed a combination of all types of coping. Machiavellianism was linked only with avoidant coping. Findings can inform researchers and clinicians in the preferred coping methods and stress responses of those with darker personalities within average daily contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信