广播、潜伏和联系:一项关于害怕错过、社交媒体参与和有问题的社交媒体使用的纵向面板研究

IF 8.3 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Cheng Chen , Xiao Zhang , Dennis Leung
{"title":"广播、潜伏和联系:一项关于害怕错过、社交媒体参与和有问题的社交媒体使用的纵向面板研究","authors":"Cheng Chen ,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang ,&nbsp;Dennis Leung","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fear of missing out (FoMO) has consistently been associated with problematic social media use in cross-sectional survey studies. Given that problematic social media use is not formed overnight, it remains unclear whether FoMO influences the development and escalation of problematic social media use over time. In addition, as FoMO often drives social media engagement, and certain types of engagement can lead to problematic use, this study examines whether different types of social media engagement—broadcasting, lurking, and connection—mediate the relationship between FoMO and problematic use. Using two-wave panel survey data (<em>N</em> = 447) from Hong Kong, we find that FoMO is positively related to problematic social media use in cross-sectional data, but it does not predict problematic behavior once it is established at Time 1. In addition, both social media broadcasting and connection positively mediate the relationship between FoMO and problematic use, even after controlling for prior levels of problematic use. In contrast, lurking mediates the relationship between FoMO and problematic social media use concurrently but not longitudinally. Theoretical implication for applying the Theory of Uses and Gratifications to understand the relationship between FoMO and unintended media use outcomes and practical implication for preventing FoMO-driven problematic social media use are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102323"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broadcasting, lurking, and connection: A longitudinal panel study of fear of missing out, social media engagement, and problematic social media use\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Chen ,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang ,&nbsp;Dennis Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fear of missing out (FoMO) has consistently been associated with problematic social media use in cross-sectional survey studies. Given that problematic social media use is not formed overnight, it remains unclear whether FoMO influences the development and escalation of problematic social media use over time. In addition, as FoMO often drives social media engagement, and certain types of engagement can lead to problematic use, this study examines whether different types of social media engagement—broadcasting, lurking, and connection—mediate the relationship between FoMO and problematic use. Using two-wave panel survey data (<em>N</em> = 447) from Hong Kong, we find that FoMO is positively related to problematic social media use in cross-sectional data, but it does not predict problematic behavior once it is established at Time 1. In addition, both social media broadcasting and connection positively mediate the relationship between FoMO and problematic use, even after controlling for prior levels of problematic use. In contrast, lurking mediates the relationship between FoMO and problematic social media use concurrently but not longitudinally. Theoretical implication for applying the Theory of Uses and Gratifications to understand the relationship between FoMO and unintended media use outcomes and practical implication for preventing FoMO-driven problematic social media use are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000851\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000851","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在横断面调查研究中,错失恐惧(FoMO)一直与有问题的社交媒体使用有关。鉴于有问题的社交媒体使用不是一夜之间形成的,目前尚不清楚FoMO是否会随着时间的推移影响有问题的社交媒体使用的发展和升级。此外,由于FoMO经常推动社交媒体参与,而某些类型的参与可能导致有问题的使用,本研究考察了不同类型的社交媒体参与——广播、潜伏和连接——是否介导了FoMO和有问题的使用之间的关系。使用来自香港的两波面板调查数据(N = 447),我们发现在横断面数据中,FoMO与有问题的社交媒体使用呈正相关,但一旦在时间1建立起来,它就不能预测有问题的行为。此外,社交媒体广播和社交连接都对FoMO和问题使用之间的关系起到了积极的中介作用,即使在控制了先前的问题使用水平之后也是如此。相比之下,潜伏在FoMO和有问题的社交媒体使用之间同时中介关系,但不是纵向中介。本文讨论了运用使用与满足理论理解FoMO与非预期媒体使用结果之间关系的理论意义,以及防止FoMO驱动的问题社交媒体使用的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Broadcasting, lurking, and connection: A longitudinal panel study of fear of missing out, social media engagement, and problematic social media use
Fear of missing out (FoMO) has consistently been associated with problematic social media use in cross-sectional survey studies. Given that problematic social media use is not formed overnight, it remains unclear whether FoMO influences the development and escalation of problematic social media use over time. In addition, as FoMO often drives social media engagement, and certain types of engagement can lead to problematic use, this study examines whether different types of social media engagement—broadcasting, lurking, and connection—mediate the relationship between FoMO and problematic use. Using two-wave panel survey data (N = 447) from Hong Kong, we find that FoMO is positively related to problematic social media use in cross-sectional data, but it does not predict problematic behavior once it is established at Time 1. In addition, both social media broadcasting and connection positively mediate the relationship between FoMO and problematic use, even after controlling for prior levels of problematic use. In contrast, lurking mediates the relationship between FoMO and problematic social media use concurrently but not longitudinally. Theoretical implication for applying the Theory of Uses and Gratifications to understand the relationship between FoMO and unintended media use outcomes and practical implication for preventing FoMO-driven problematic social media use are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信