Guo-Hao Lin,April Martinez,Vincent Li,Eric Lee,Kang-Wei Tu,Richard Kao,Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"传统非再生牙周缺损治疗的长期稳定性。","authors":"Guo-Hao Lin,April Martinez,Vincent Li,Eric Lee,Kang-Wei Tu,Richard Kao,Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1111/prd.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nFurcation involvement (FI) in multi-rooted teeth poses significant challenges in periodontal therapy due to complex anatomy and difficulty in achieving effective maintenance. FI is associated with increased periodontal destruction, especially in sites with narrow furcation entrances and deep root concavities. These features hinder effective debridement and compromise the efficacy of periodontal treatments.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nThis narrative review examines non-regenerative treatment approaches for managing FI, focusing on clinical outcomes and failure rates associated with flap procedures, biologic root reshaping, root amputation, root separation, and root tunneling.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNon-regenerative procedures show variable outcomes. Reported failure rates include 20.1% for root amputation (range: 0%-61.1%), 18.8% for root separation (range: 2.9%-38%), and 20.9% for root tunneling (range: 7.1%-42.9%). These variations are influenced by factors such as FI severity, root morphology, and patient hygiene.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nEffective management of FI requires accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment selection, and individualized maintenance protocols. Long-term success is closely tied to case selection and the patient's commitment to ongoing periodontal maintenance care.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\r\nUnderstanding the therapeutic prognosis and limitations of non-regenerative approaches in FI cases is essential for optimizing long-term treatment outcomes. Clinicians should emphasize maintenance strategies and consider anatomical challenges when selecting treatment modalities.","PeriodicalId":19736,"journal":{"name":"Periodontology 2000","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term stability of conventional non-regenerative periodontal treatment for furcation defects.\",\"authors\":\"Guo-Hao Lin,April Martinez,Vincent Li,Eric Lee,Kang-Wei Tu,Richard Kao,Hom-Lay Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/prd.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nFurcation involvement (FI) in multi-rooted teeth poses significant challenges in periodontal therapy due to complex anatomy and difficulty in achieving effective maintenance. FI is associated with increased periodontal destruction, especially in sites with narrow furcation entrances and deep root concavities. These features hinder effective debridement and compromise the efficacy of periodontal treatments.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nThis narrative review examines non-regenerative treatment approaches for managing FI, focusing on clinical outcomes and failure rates associated with flap procedures, biologic root reshaping, root amputation, root separation, and root tunneling.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nNon-regenerative procedures show variable outcomes. Reported failure rates include 20.1% for root amputation (range: 0%-61.1%), 18.8% for root separation (range: 2.9%-38%), and 20.9% for root tunneling (range: 7.1%-42.9%). These variations are influenced by factors such as FI severity, root morphology, and patient hygiene.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nEffective management of FI requires accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment selection, and individualized maintenance protocols. Long-term success is closely tied to case selection and the patient's commitment to ongoing periodontal maintenance care.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\\r\\nUnderstanding the therapeutic prognosis and limitations of non-regenerative approaches in FI cases is essential for optimizing long-term treatment outcomes. Clinicians should emphasize maintenance strategies and consider anatomical challenges when selecting treatment modalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodontology 2000\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodontology 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.70007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodontology 2000","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.70007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term stability of conventional non-regenerative periodontal treatment for furcation defects.
BACKGROUND
Furcation involvement (FI) in multi-rooted teeth poses significant challenges in periodontal therapy due to complex anatomy and difficulty in achieving effective maintenance. FI is associated with increased periodontal destruction, especially in sites with narrow furcation entrances and deep root concavities. These features hinder effective debridement and compromise the efficacy of periodontal treatments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This narrative review examines non-regenerative treatment approaches for managing FI, focusing on clinical outcomes and failure rates associated with flap procedures, biologic root reshaping, root amputation, root separation, and root tunneling.
RESULTS
Non-regenerative procedures show variable outcomes. Reported failure rates include 20.1% for root amputation (range: 0%-61.1%), 18.8% for root separation (range: 2.9%-38%), and 20.9% for root tunneling (range: 7.1%-42.9%). These variations are influenced by factors such as FI severity, root morphology, and patient hygiene.
CONCLUSION
Effective management of FI requires accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment selection, and individualized maintenance protocols. Long-term success is closely tied to case selection and the patient's commitment to ongoing periodontal maintenance care.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Understanding the therapeutic prognosis and limitations of non-regenerative approaches in FI cases is essential for optimizing long-term treatment outcomes. Clinicians should emphasize maintenance strategies and consider anatomical challenges when selecting treatment modalities.
期刊介绍:
Periodontology 2000 is a series of monographs designed for periodontists and general practitioners interested in periodontics. The editorial board selects significant topics and distinguished scientists and clinicians for each monograph. Serving as a valuable supplement to existing periodontal journals, three monographs are published annually, contributing specialized insights to the field.