乔瓦尼·阿方索·博雷利,乔治·巴格利维和17世纪心跳的起源。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1152/advan.00131.2025
Diego Mombelli, Francesco Castagna, Ilaria Rivolta, Michele A Riva
{"title":"乔瓦尼·阿方索·博雷利,乔治·巴格利维和17世纪心跳的起源。","authors":"Diego Mombelli, Francesco Castagna, Ilaria Rivolta, Michele A Riva","doi":"10.1152/advan.00131.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Giovanni Alfonso Borelli (1608-1679) and Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1707) were prominent figures in early modern physiology who contributed significantly to the evolving debate on the origin of the heartbeat. Borelli, a leading exponent of iatromechanics, acknowledged the autonomous continuation of the heartbeat but attributed its initial impulse to a <i>facultas sensitiva</i> capable of perceiving internal imbalances. Baglivi advanced the discussion by proposing a fiber-based model of the body and offering experimental evidence of the heart's intrinsic contractile capacity. He classified body fibers into membranous and carneous types, locating the active force of contraction within the structure of the muscle itself. Although neither author wholly excluded the role of nerves, their work marked a pivotal moment in the conceptual shift toward intrinsic explanations of cardiac rhythm and laid the groundwork for future developments in cardiovascular physiology.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Borelli and Baglivi were pioneers in cardiac physiology in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. They both contributed to the gradual shift toward intrinsic explanations of the heartbeat, proposing that the heart possesses an autonomous capacity for contraction, laying the foundations for later myogenic models. Their experimental and theoretical work marked a turning point in early modern physiology, paving the way for subsequent research in cardiac function and the development of modern cardiovascular physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"968-975"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, Giorgio Baglivi, and the origin of the heartbeat in the seventeenth century.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Mombelli, Francesco Castagna, Ilaria Rivolta, Michele A Riva\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00131.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Giovanni Alfonso Borelli (1608-1679) and Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1707) were prominent figures in early modern physiology who contributed significantly to the evolving debate on the origin of the heartbeat. Borelli, a leading exponent of iatromechanics, acknowledged the autonomous continuation of the heartbeat but attributed its initial impulse to a <i>facultas sensitiva</i> capable of perceiving internal imbalances. Baglivi advanced the discussion by proposing a fiber-based model of the body and offering experimental evidence of the heart's intrinsic contractile capacity. He classified body fibers into membranous and carneous types, locating the active force of contraction within the structure of the muscle itself. Although neither author wholly excluded the role of nerves, their work marked a pivotal moment in the conceptual shift toward intrinsic explanations of cardiac rhythm and laid the groundwork for future developments in cardiovascular physiology.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Borelli and Baglivi were pioneers in cardiac physiology in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. They both contributed to the gradual shift toward intrinsic explanations of the heartbeat, proposing that the heart possesses an autonomous capacity for contraction, laying the foundations for later myogenic models. Their experimental and theoretical work marked a turning point in early modern physiology, paving the way for subsequent research in cardiac function and the development of modern cardiovascular physiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"968-975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00131.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00131.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乔瓦尼·阿方索·博雷利(1608-1679)和乔治·巴格利维(1668-1707)是早期现代生理学的杰出人物,他们对不断演变的关于心跳起源的辩论做出了重大贡献。博雷利,一个医疗力学的主要代表,承认心跳的自主延续,但将其最初的冲动归因于能够感知内部不平衡的“敏感性”。Baglivi提出了一种基于纤维的身体模型,并提供了心脏内在收缩能力的实验证据,从而推动了这一讨论。他把人体纤维分为膜性和卡尼性两类,把主动收缩的力量定位在肌肉本身的结构中。虽然两位作者都没有完全排除神经的作用,但他们的工作标志着向心律内在解释的概念转变的关键时刻,并为心血管生理学的未来发展奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, Giorgio Baglivi, and the origin of the heartbeat in the seventeenth century.

Giovanni Alfonso Borelli (1608-1679) and Giorgio Baglivi (1668-1707) were prominent figures in early modern physiology who contributed significantly to the evolving debate on the origin of the heartbeat. Borelli, a leading exponent of iatromechanics, acknowledged the autonomous continuation of the heartbeat but attributed its initial impulse to a facultas sensitiva capable of perceiving internal imbalances. Baglivi advanced the discussion by proposing a fiber-based model of the body and offering experimental evidence of the heart's intrinsic contractile capacity. He classified body fibers into membranous and carneous types, locating the active force of contraction within the structure of the muscle itself. Although neither author wholly excluded the role of nerves, their work marked a pivotal moment in the conceptual shift toward intrinsic explanations of cardiac rhythm and laid the groundwork for future developments in cardiovascular physiology.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Borelli and Baglivi were pioneers in cardiac physiology in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. They both contributed to the gradual shift toward intrinsic explanations of the heartbeat, proposing that the heart possesses an autonomous capacity for contraction, laying the foundations for later myogenic models. Their experimental and theoretical work marked a turning point in early modern physiology, paving the way for subsequent research in cardiac function and the development of modern cardiovascular physiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信