俯卧位配合持续肠内营养对COVID-19非插管患者吸入性肺炎的影响

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Clinical Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1177/10547738251368972
Sari Winham, Michael LeGal, Jennifer Ernst, Ashley Foldes, Jasmine Cura, Courtney Fried
{"title":"俯卧位配合持续肠内营养对COVID-19非插管患者吸入性肺炎的影响","authors":"Sari Winham, Michael LeGal, Jennifer Ernst, Ashley Foldes, Jasmine Cura, Courtney Fried","doi":"10.1177/10547738251368972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a triad of therapies for patients: oxygen, nutrition, and patient positioning. In the progressive care units, patients were placed in a prone position while receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN) to optimize healing and oxygenation. The study aimed to identify the rate of aspiration pneumonia in non-ventilated COVID-19 patients placed in a prone position while receiving continuous EN. This was a single-group, descriptive retrospective study. The study was conducted at a two-time Magnet<sup>®</sup> designated academic medical and health science center in the Southwestern United States. The sample included 97 electronic health records (EHRs) of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, receiving continuous EN, and placed in a prone position from March 15, 2020 to June 1, 2022. Data were extracted from EHRs using ICD-10 codes, including patient demographics, EN frequency, gastric tube placement, patient positioning, and incidence of aspiration pneumonia. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> ≤ .05. Out of 97 patients, 8 (8.25%) developed aspiration pneumonia. The majority of patients (75%) had post-pyloric feeding tubes. All patients who developed aspiration pneumonia had post-pyloric tubes. Placing COVID-19 patients in a prone position while receiving continuous EN may be a safe practice. Diligent nursing assessment is crucial to minimize aspiration risk and optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Prone Positioning With Continuous Enteral Nutrition on Aspiration Pneumonia in Non-Intubated Patients With COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Sari Winham, Michael LeGal, Jennifer Ernst, Ashley Foldes, Jasmine Cura, Courtney Fried\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10547738251368972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a triad of therapies for patients: oxygen, nutrition, and patient positioning. In the progressive care units, patients were placed in a prone position while receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN) to optimize healing and oxygenation. The study aimed to identify the rate of aspiration pneumonia in non-ventilated COVID-19 patients placed in a prone position while receiving continuous EN. This was a single-group, descriptive retrospective study. The study was conducted at a two-time Magnet<sup>®</sup> designated academic medical and health science center in the Southwestern United States. The sample included 97 electronic health records (EHRs) of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, receiving continuous EN, and placed in a prone position from March 15, 2020 to June 1, 2022. Data were extracted from EHRs using ICD-10 codes, including patient demographics, EN frequency, gastric tube placement, patient positioning, and incidence of aspiration pneumonia. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> ≤ .05. Out of 97 patients, 8 (8.25%) developed aspiration pneumonia. The majority of patients (75%) had post-pyloric feeding tubes. All patients who developed aspiration pneumonia had post-pyloric tubes. Placing COVID-19 patients in a prone position while receiving continuous EN may be a safe practice. Diligent nursing assessment is crucial to minimize aspiration risk and optimize patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"393-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251368972\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251368972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行需要对患者进行三重治疗:氧气、营养和患者体位。在渐进护理病房,患者被放置在俯卧位,同时接受持续肠内营养(EN),以优化愈合和氧合。本研究旨在确定非通气的COVID-19患者俯卧位连续接受EN治疗时吸入性肺炎的发生率。这是一项单组、描述性回顾性研究。该研究是在美国西南部两次被Magnet®指定的学术医学和健康科学中心进行的。样本包括97例被诊断为COVID-19的患者的电子健康记录(EHRs),这些患者在2020年3月15日至2022年6月1日期间连续接受EN治疗,并处于俯卧位。使用ICD-10代码从电子病历中提取数据,包括患者人口统计学、EN频率、胃管放置、患者体位和吸入性肺炎的发生率。采用描述性统计和非参数检验。采用Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验和Fisher精确检验进行比较。p≤0.05有统计学意义。97例患者中,8例(8.25%)发生吸入性肺炎。大多数患者(75%)使用幽门后饲管。所有发生吸入性肺炎的患者都有幽门后管。将COVID-19患者置于俯卧位,同时接受持续EN可能是一种安全的做法。认真的护理评估对于减少误吸风险和优化患者预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Prone Positioning With Continuous Enteral Nutrition on Aspiration Pneumonia in Non-Intubated Patients With COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a triad of therapies for patients: oxygen, nutrition, and patient positioning. In the progressive care units, patients were placed in a prone position while receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN) to optimize healing and oxygenation. The study aimed to identify the rate of aspiration pneumonia in non-ventilated COVID-19 patients placed in a prone position while receiving continuous EN. This was a single-group, descriptive retrospective study. The study was conducted at a two-time Magnet® designated academic medical and health science center in the Southwestern United States. The sample included 97 electronic health records (EHRs) of patients diagnosed with COVID-19, receiving continuous EN, and placed in a prone position from March 15, 2020 to June 1, 2022. Data were extracted from EHRs using ICD-10 codes, including patient demographics, EN frequency, gastric tube placement, patient positioning, and incidence of aspiration pneumonia. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ .05. Out of 97 patients, 8 (8.25%) developed aspiration pneumonia. The majority of patients (75%) had post-pyloric feeding tubes. All patients who developed aspiration pneumonia had post-pyloric tubes. Placing COVID-19 patients in a prone position while receiving continuous EN may be a safe practice. Diligent nursing assessment is crucial to minimize aspiration risk and optimize patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信