经皮肾镜取石术中5类体外碎石装置的疗效和安全性比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Wenzhuo Zhang, Ziyu Ye, Shoule Wang, Baorong Feng, Wen Zhong
{"title":"经皮肾镜取石术中5类体外碎石装置的疗效和安全性比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenzhuo Zhang, Ziyu Ye, Shoule Wang, Baorong Feng, Wen Zhong","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of five categories of intracorporeal lithotripsy devices in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Pneumatic lithotripters, ultrasonic lithotripters, double-probe dual-energy lithotripters, single-probe dual-energy (SPDE) lithotripters and lasers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A network meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were utilised to search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to 10 August 2024. Surface under cumulative ranking area technique was used to rank interventions. Outcomes of interest included baseline characteristics, stone-free rate (SFR), complications, operative time and fragmentation time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen RCTs comprising 1516 procedures were included. No statistically significant difference was found in complications after using the devices. SPDE lithotripters (ratio of ratios (RR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.11 to 3.28)) and lasers (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.84) were associated with significantly higher SFR than pneumatic lithotripters. SPDE lithotripters significantly outperformed in decreasing operation time and fragmentation time. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, lasers and SPDE lithotripters performed better in SFR. In addition, SPDE lithotripters exhibited superior performance in terms of few complications and shortest fragmentation time and operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All five categories of devices were found to be equally safe for PCNL. SPDE lithotripters and lasers had higher efficacy. Moreover, SPDE lithotripters exhibited the shortest fragmentation time and operative time. These findings suggest that SPDE lithotripters have potential to be next-generation efficient lithotripsy devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 7","pages":"884-895"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Five Categories of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Control Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Wenzhuo Zhang, Ziyu Ye, Shoule Wang, Baorong Feng, Wen Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of five categories of intracorporeal lithotripsy devices in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Pneumatic lithotripters, ultrasonic lithotripters, double-probe dual-energy lithotripters, single-probe dual-energy (SPDE) lithotripters and lasers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A network meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were utilised to search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to 10 August 2024. Surface under cumulative ranking area technique was used to rank interventions. Outcomes of interest included baseline characteristics, stone-free rate (SFR), complications, operative time and fragmentation time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen RCTs comprising 1516 procedures were included. No statistically significant difference was found in complications after using the devices. SPDE lithotripters (ratio of ratios (RR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.11 to 3.28)) and lasers (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.84) were associated with significantly higher SFR than pneumatic lithotripters. SPDE lithotripters significantly outperformed in decreasing operation time and fragmentation time. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, lasers and SPDE lithotripters performed better in SFR. In addition, SPDE lithotripters exhibited superior performance in terms of few complications and shortest fragmentation time and operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All five categories of devices were found to be equally safe for PCNL. SPDE lithotripters and lasers had higher efficacy. Moreover, SPDE lithotripters exhibited the shortest fragmentation time and operative time. These findings suggest that SPDE lithotripters have potential to be next-generation efficient lithotripsy devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"volume\":\"78 7\",\"pages\":\"884-895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257807.117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨气动碎石机、超声碎石机、双探头双能碎石机、单探头双能碎石机、激光碎石机在经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中的有效性和安全性。方法:根据系统评价和元分析指南的首选报告项目进行网络元分析。利用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane检索截至2024年8月10日的随机对照试验(rct)。采用面下累积排序面积法对干预措施进行排序。结果包括基线特征、无结石率(SFR)、并发症、手术时间和碎片化时间。结果:纳入14项随机对照试验,共1516例手术。两组患者术后并发症发生率无统计学差异。SPDE碎石机(比值比(RR) = 1.90, 95%可信区间(CI) =(1.11 ~ 3.28))和激光碎石机(RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.09 ~ 2.84)与SFR显著高于气动碎石机相关。SPDE碎石机在缩短操作时间和破碎时间方面具有明显的优势。从累积排序曲线下表面(SUCRA)值来看,激光碎石机和SPDE碎石机在SFR中表现更好。此外,SPDE碎石机在并发症少、碎裂时间短、手术时间短等方面表现优越。结论:所有五类器械对PCNL都是同样安全的。SPDE碎石机和激光具有更高的效能。SPDE碎石机破碎时间最短,操作时间最短。这些发现表明SPDE碎石机有潜力成为下一代高效的碎石机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Five Categories of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy Devices in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Control Trials.

Objectives: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of five categories of intracorporeal lithotripsy devices in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Pneumatic lithotripters, ultrasonic lithotripters, double-probe dual-energy lithotripters, single-probe dual-energy (SPDE) lithotripters and lasers.

Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were utilised to search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to 10 August 2024. Surface under cumulative ranking area technique was used to rank interventions. Outcomes of interest included baseline characteristics, stone-free rate (SFR), complications, operative time and fragmentation time.

Results: Fourteen RCTs comprising 1516 procedures were included. No statistically significant difference was found in complications after using the devices. SPDE lithotripters (ratio of ratios (RR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.11 to 3.28)) and lasers (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.84) were associated with significantly higher SFR than pneumatic lithotripters. SPDE lithotripters significantly outperformed in decreasing operation time and fragmentation time. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, lasers and SPDE lithotripters performed better in SFR. In addition, SPDE lithotripters exhibited superior performance in terms of few complications and shortest fragmentation time and operative time.

Conclusions: All five categories of devices were found to be equally safe for PCNL. SPDE lithotripters and lasers had higher efficacy. Moreover, SPDE lithotripters exhibited the shortest fragmentation time and operative time. These findings suggest that SPDE lithotripters have potential to be next-generation efficient lithotripsy devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信