以社区为基础的粮食获取组织技术援助的多种方法评估。

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shelly Palmer, Laura E Balis, Emily Shaw, Amy Yaroch
{"title":"以社区为基础的粮食获取组织技术援助的多种方法评估。","authors":"Shelly Palmer, Laura E Balis, Emily Shaw, Amy Yaroch","doi":"10.1177/15248399251363961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. foundations contribute billions of dollars each year to community-based organizations (CBOs). Showing the impact of the funding and return on investment within the communities served is beneficial to both funders and CBOs. However, often due to limited capacity for staff and resources, program evaluation can be challenging within CBOs, and technical assistance (TA) on implementing robust program evaluation and dissemination practices can build capacity. This study assessed the effectiveness and implementation of TA for evaluation and dissemination provided from June 2023 to July 2024 to UnitedHealthcare grantees implementing healthy food access interventions. The effectiveness of individual monthly TA meetings was qualitatively evaluated through post-TA interviews. TA implementation was evaluated through qualitative analysis by coding meeting notes according to the topics addressed: evaluation plan, evaluation measures, dissemination plan, and dissemination channels. A total of 41 individual TA meetings were conducted. Among the five interviewees, grantees mentioned changes to evaluation practices including developing an evaluation plan, refining surveys and cost-effectiveness analysis, and expanding data collection to include qualitative measures. There were fewer changes to dissemination practices, including expanding information in funder reports, adding one-pagers for referral partners, and creating internal quarterly reports. TA topics discussed included evaluation measures (n = 16 mentions), evaluation planning (n = 13), other content areas (n = 10), dissemination planning (n = 3), and dissemination strategies (n = 3). Findings illustrate that TA can positively impact grantees' practices, especially on program evaluation. Overall, the partnership between the funder, TA providers, and grantees preliminarily shows the benefit of TA to support robust program evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251363961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi Methods Assessment of Technical Assistance for Community-Based Food Access Organizations.\",\"authors\":\"Shelly Palmer, Laura E Balis, Emily Shaw, Amy Yaroch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399251363961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The U.S. foundations contribute billions of dollars each year to community-based organizations (CBOs). Showing the impact of the funding and return on investment within the communities served is beneficial to both funders and CBOs. However, often due to limited capacity for staff and resources, program evaluation can be challenging within CBOs, and technical assistance (TA) on implementing robust program evaluation and dissemination practices can build capacity. This study assessed the effectiveness and implementation of TA for evaluation and dissemination provided from June 2023 to July 2024 to UnitedHealthcare grantees implementing healthy food access interventions. The effectiveness of individual monthly TA meetings was qualitatively evaluated through post-TA interviews. TA implementation was evaluated through qualitative analysis by coding meeting notes according to the topics addressed: evaluation plan, evaluation measures, dissemination plan, and dissemination channels. A total of 41 individual TA meetings were conducted. Among the five interviewees, grantees mentioned changes to evaluation practices including developing an evaluation plan, refining surveys and cost-effectiveness analysis, and expanding data collection to include qualitative measures. There were fewer changes to dissemination practices, including expanding information in funder reports, adding one-pagers for referral partners, and creating internal quarterly reports. TA topics discussed included evaluation measures (n = 16 mentions), evaluation planning (n = 13), other content areas (n = 10), dissemination planning (n = 3), and dissemination strategies (n = 3). Findings illustrate that TA can positively impact grantees' practices, especially on program evaluation. Overall, the partnership between the funder, TA providers, and grantees preliminarily shows the benefit of TA to support robust program evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399251363961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251363961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251363961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的基金会每年向社区组织(cbo)捐赠数十亿美元。在所服务的社区中展示资金的影响和投资回报对资助者和cbo都是有益的。然而,通常由于工作人员和资源的能力有限,项目评估在cbo内部可能具有挑战性,而实施稳健的项目评估和传播实践的技术援助(TA)可以建立能力。本研究评估了从2023年6月至2024年7月向联合医疗保健受助人提供的健康食品获取干预措施的评估和传播TA的有效性和实施情况。每个月单独的助教会议的有效性通过助教后访谈进行定性评估。根据讨论的主题:评估计划、评估措施、传播计划、传播渠道,通过编码会议记录进行定性分析,评估TA的实施情况。共进行了41次个别助教会议。在五位受访者中,受助者提到了评估实践的变化,包括制定评估计划、改进调查和成本效益分析,以及扩大数据收集以包括定性措施。传播实践的变化较少,包括扩大资助者报告中的信息,为推荐合作伙伴增加一页纸,以及创建内部季度报告。讨论的TA主题包括评价措施(n = 16)、评价计划(n = 13)、其他内容领域(n = 10)、传播计划(n = 3)和传播策略(n = 3)。研究结果表明,助教可以积极地影响受助人的实践,特别是在项目评估方面。总的来说,资助者、技术评估提供者和受助人之间的伙伴关系初步显示了技术评估在支持稳健的项目评估方面的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi Methods Assessment of Technical Assistance for Community-Based Food Access Organizations.

The U.S. foundations contribute billions of dollars each year to community-based organizations (CBOs). Showing the impact of the funding and return on investment within the communities served is beneficial to both funders and CBOs. However, often due to limited capacity for staff and resources, program evaluation can be challenging within CBOs, and technical assistance (TA) on implementing robust program evaluation and dissemination practices can build capacity. This study assessed the effectiveness and implementation of TA for evaluation and dissemination provided from June 2023 to July 2024 to UnitedHealthcare grantees implementing healthy food access interventions. The effectiveness of individual monthly TA meetings was qualitatively evaluated through post-TA interviews. TA implementation was evaluated through qualitative analysis by coding meeting notes according to the topics addressed: evaluation plan, evaluation measures, dissemination plan, and dissemination channels. A total of 41 individual TA meetings were conducted. Among the five interviewees, grantees mentioned changes to evaluation practices including developing an evaluation plan, refining surveys and cost-effectiveness analysis, and expanding data collection to include qualitative measures. There were fewer changes to dissemination practices, including expanding information in funder reports, adding one-pagers for referral partners, and creating internal quarterly reports. TA topics discussed included evaluation measures (n = 16 mentions), evaluation planning (n = 13), other content areas (n = 10), dissemination planning (n = 3), and dissemination strategies (n = 3). Findings illustrate that TA can positively impact grantees' practices, especially on program evaluation. Overall, the partnership between the funder, TA providers, and grantees preliminarily shows the benefit of TA to support robust program evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信