骨科创伤中社会经济剥夺的测量：范围回顾。

IF 2.4 Q2 SURGERY

JBJS Reviews Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00087

Edith G Otalike, Andrew D Firth, Alanna Marson, Emil H Scheimitsch, Gagnier J Joel

{"title":"骨科创伤中社会经济剥夺的测量：范围回顾。","authors":"Edith G Otalike, Andrew D Firth, Alanna Marson, Emil H Scheimitsch, Gagnier J Joel","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"» There is wide variability in the measurement tools used to assess socioeconomic deprivation status (SDS) in orthopaedic trauma research, including single-item, multi-item, and area-based indices.» Area-based SDS measures are commonly used because they can be readily linked to geographic identifiers in administrative data; however, they are limited by ecological fallacy and may misclassify individual-level socioeconomic status.» The lack of standardization in SDS measurement limits comparability across studies, highlighting the need for core measurement domains to support equity-focused research.","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Socioeconomic Deprivation in Orthopaedic Trauma: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Edith G Otalike, Andrew D Firth, Alanna Marson, Emil H Scheimitsch, Gagnier J Joel\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"» There is wide variability in the measurement tools used to assess socioeconomic deprivation status (SDS) in orthopaedic trauma research, including single-item, multi-item, and area-based indices.» Area-based SDS measures are commonly used because they can be readily linked to geographic identifiers in administrative data; however, they are limited by ecological fallacy and may misclassify individual-level socioeconomic status.» The lack of standardization in SDS measurement limits comparability across studies, highlighting the need for core measurement domains to support equity-focused research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在骨科创伤研究中，用于评估社会经济剥夺状况（SDS）的测量工具存在很大的差异，包括单项目、多项目和基于区域的指标。*通常使用基于区域的SDS措施，因为它们可以很容易地与行政数据中的地理标识符联系起来；然而，它们受到生态谬误的限制，可能对个人层面的社会经济地位进行错误的分类。»SDS测量缺乏标准化限制了研究之间的可比性，强调了核心测量领域支持股票研究的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Measurement of Socioeconomic Deprivation in Orthopaedic Trauma: A Scoping Review.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Measurement of Socioeconomic Deprivation in Orthopaedic Trauma: A Scoping Review.

» There is wide variability in the measurement tools used to assess socioeconomic deprivation status (SDS) in orthopaedic trauma research, including single-item, multi-item, and area-based indices.» Area-based SDS measures are commonly used because they can be readily linked to geographic identifiers in administrative data; however, they are limited by ecological fallacy and may misclassify individual-level socioeconomic status.» The lack of standardization in SDS measurement limits comparability across studies, highlighting the need for core measurement domains to support equity-focused research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JBJS Reviews SURGERY-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

4.30%

发文量

132

期刊介绍： JBJS Reviews is an innovative review journal from the publishers of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. This continuously published online journal provides comprehensive, objective, and authoritative review articles written by recognized experts in the field. Edited by Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, and a distinguished Editorial Board, each issue of JBJS Reviews, updates the orthopaedic community on important topics in a concise, time-saving manner, providing expert insights into orthopaedic research and clinical experience. Comprehensive reviews, special features, and integrated CME provide orthopaedic surgeons with valuable perspectives on surgical practice and the latest advances in the field within twelve subspecialty areas: Basic Science, Education & Training, Elbow, Ethics, Foot & Ankle, Hand & Wrist, Hip, Infection, Knee, Oncology, Pediatrics, Pain Management, Rehabilitation, Shoulder, Spine, Sports Medicine, Trauma.