家庭过程的测量:韩国人、韩裔中国人和韩裔美国人的心理测量特性和不变性测试。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Yoonsun Choi, Michael Park, Yishan Shen, Meng-Run Zhang, Kihyun Kim
{"title":"家庭过程的测量:韩国人、韩裔中国人和韩裔美国人的心理测量特性和不变性测试。","authors":"Yoonsun Choi, Michael Park, Yishan Shen, Meng-Run Zhang, Kihyun Kim","doi":"10.1037/dev0002074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using data from three interrelated studies of Korean adolescents in South Korea (<i>N</i> = 524; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.98), China (<i>N</i> = 267; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.24), and the United States (<i>N</i> = 408; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.76), this study tested the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of multiple measures of family process, including those originally developed for subgroups of Asian Americans and commonly used Western measures. The results showed excellent psychometric properties of the scales in each group and supported metric and scalar invariances, at least partial for some, of the examined measures, providing cross-culturally comparable instruments for diverse Korean communities across the United States and majority countries. The findings also showed nuanced cultural variations despite similar conceptualizations of the constructs across groups. The study compared the means of the family process measures and examined the associations among these measures and with youth adjustments. The results from these urban samples in three different sociopolitical and economic contexts may reflect a complex interplay of culture and minority status in shaping the family process and its impact on youth development, illustrating how the modern Korean family process is flexible and responsive to local contexts. The findings of this study present useful instruments and warrant additional research on the antecedents, mechanisms, and implications of the family process to maximize youth potential in respective contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measures of family process: Psychometric properties and invariance testing across South Koreans, Korean Chinese, and Korean Americans.\",\"authors\":\"Yoonsun Choi, Michael Park, Yishan Shen, Meng-Run Zhang, Kihyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0002074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using data from three interrelated studies of Korean adolescents in South Korea (<i>N</i> = 524; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.98), China (<i>N</i> = 267; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 15.24), and the United States (<i>N</i> = 408; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 14.76), this study tested the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of multiple measures of family process, including those originally developed for subgroups of Asian Americans and commonly used Western measures. The results showed excellent psychometric properties of the scales in each group and supported metric and scalar invariances, at least partial for some, of the examined measures, providing cross-culturally comparable instruments for diverse Korean communities across the United States and majority countries. The findings also showed nuanced cultural variations despite similar conceptualizations of the constructs across groups. The study compared the means of the family process measures and examined the associations among these measures and with youth adjustments. The results from these urban samples in three different sociopolitical and economic contexts may reflect a complex interplay of culture and minority status in shaping the family process and its impact on youth development, illustrating how the modern Korean family process is flexible and responsive to local contexts. The findings of this study present useful instruments and warrant additional research on the antecedents, mechanisms, and implications of the family process to maximize youth potential in respective contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用来自韩国(N = 524; Mage = 14.98)、中国(N = 267; Mage = 15.24)和美国(N = 408; Mage = 14.76)三个相关研究的数据,本研究测试了家庭过程的多种测量方法的心理测量特性和测量不变性,包括最初为亚裔美国人亚群开发的测量方法和常用的西方测量方法。结果显示,每个组的量表都具有出色的心理测量特性,并支持度量和标量不变性,至少部分支持所检查的措施,为美国和大多数国家的不同韩国社区提供跨文化可比的工具。研究结果还显示了细微的文化差异,尽管不同群体的概念相似。该研究比较了家庭过程措施的手段,并检查了这些措施之间的联系,并与青年调整。这些城市样本在三种不同的社会政治和经济背景下的结果可能反映了文化和少数民族地位在塑造家庭过程及其对青年发展的影响方面的复杂相互作用,说明了现代韩国家庭过程是如何灵活并对当地环境作出反应的。本研究的发现提供了有用的工具,并保证对家庭过程的前因、机制和影响进行进一步的研究,以在各自的背景下最大化青少年的潜力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measures of family process: Psychometric properties and invariance testing across South Koreans, Korean Chinese, and Korean Americans.

Using data from three interrelated studies of Korean adolescents in South Korea (N = 524; Mage = 14.98), China (N = 267; Mage = 15.24), and the United States (N = 408; Mage = 14.76), this study tested the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of multiple measures of family process, including those originally developed for subgroups of Asian Americans and commonly used Western measures. The results showed excellent psychometric properties of the scales in each group and supported metric and scalar invariances, at least partial for some, of the examined measures, providing cross-culturally comparable instruments for diverse Korean communities across the United States and majority countries. The findings also showed nuanced cultural variations despite similar conceptualizations of the constructs across groups. The study compared the means of the family process measures and examined the associations among these measures and with youth adjustments. The results from these urban samples in three different sociopolitical and economic contexts may reflect a complex interplay of culture and minority status in shaping the family process and its impact on youth development, illustrating how the modern Korean family process is flexible and responsive to local contexts. The findings of this study present useful instruments and warrant additional research on the antecedents, mechanisms, and implications of the family process to maximize youth potential in respective contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信