{"title":"在以讲座为基础的大群体中,个人和团体的反思导致了相似的学习成功。","authors":"Clemens Höbaus, Ralf Schmidmaier","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02610-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to elucidate a possible effect of individual reflection (IR) or group reflection (GR) on short-term and long-term memory retention in a large group lecture-based environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quasi-experimental study 656 medical students were enrolled to compare the impact of IR and GR directly after the lectures and 2 months later. Students were divided into two groups and given two different lectures using IR or GR in a cross-over fashion. Memory retention was estimated using multiple-choice questions analyzed by Student's T‑test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Memory retention was similar using both reflection methods at baseline (p = 0.867; p = 0.971) and follow-up (p = 0.885; p = 0.945). Interestingly, both reflection methods fostered good memory retention over time. Students' self-assessment initially favored GR as more beneficial, an effect that faded over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reflection might be a promising tool to foster memory retention in large lecture cohorts without added benefit from social interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual and group reflection in lecture-based large groups lead to comparable learning success.\",\"authors\":\"Clemens Höbaus, Ralf Schmidmaier\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00508-025-02610-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to elucidate a possible effect of individual reflection (IR) or group reflection (GR) on short-term and long-term memory retention in a large group lecture-based environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quasi-experimental study 656 medical students were enrolled to compare the impact of IR and GR directly after the lectures and 2 months later. Students were divided into two groups and given two different lectures using IR or GR in a cross-over fashion. Memory retention was estimated using multiple-choice questions analyzed by Student's T‑test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Memory retention was similar using both reflection methods at baseline (p = 0.867; p = 0.971) and follow-up (p = 0.885; p = 0.945). Interestingly, both reflection methods fostered good memory retention over time. Students' self-assessment initially favored GR as more beneficial, an effect that faded over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reflection might be a promising tool to foster memory retention in large lecture cohorts without added benefit from social interaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02610-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02610-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Individual and group reflection in lecture-based large groups lead to comparable learning success.
Objective: The study aims to elucidate a possible effect of individual reflection (IR) or group reflection (GR) on short-term and long-term memory retention in a large group lecture-based environment.
Methods: In this quasi-experimental study 656 medical students were enrolled to compare the impact of IR and GR directly after the lectures and 2 months later. Students were divided into two groups and given two different lectures using IR or GR in a cross-over fashion. Memory retention was estimated using multiple-choice questions analyzed by Student's T‑test.
Results: Memory retention was similar using both reflection methods at baseline (p = 0.867; p = 0.971) and follow-up (p = 0.885; p = 0.945). Interestingly, both reflection methods fostered good memory retention over time. Students' self-assessment initially favored GR as more beneficial, an effect that faded over time.
Conclusion: Reflection might be a promising tool to foster memory retention in large lecture cohorts without added benefit from social interaction.
期刊介绍:
The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.