鸟射性视网膜脉络膜病患者皮质类固醇、免疫抑制剂和生物疗法的评价。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI:10.1080/09273948.2025.2530139
Sofia Essadiq, Laurence Bouillet, Christophe Chiquet
{"title":"鸟射性视网膜脉络膜病患者皮质类固醇、免疫抑制剂和生物疗法的评价。","authors":"Sofia Essadiq, Laurence Bouillet, Christophe Chiquet","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2530139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the therapeutic response to corticosteroids (CS), conventional immunosuppressants (IS) and biotherapies in patients with birdshot retinochoroidopathy (BSCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>retrospective observational monocentric cohort study of 44 patients (87 eyes) with BSCR. We evaluated the therapeutic response between 4 and 12 months for venous vasculitis, capillary leakage, choroiditis and macular edema for the different therapeutic lines in each treated eye, a total of 225 evaluations. We defined responses as complete, partial, absent or quiescent according to a global inflammation score and according to the different inflammatory targets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Corticosteroids showed significant efficacy in choroiditis and vasculitis with 70% and 63% complete responses in these two criteria respectively, whereas their efficacy in capillary leakage was less evident with 38% lack of response. Conventional IS achieved a complete response in 54% of cases of choroiditis and 48% of cases of vasculitis, while their efficacy was less evident in macular edema, with partial or no response in 60% of cases. Anti-TNFα are fully effective in 41% of cases of choroiditis and in 50% of cases of venous vasculitis. Their efficacy in macular edema was very modest, with 77% of trials showing partial or no response. Anti-IL-6 drug was particularly effective in macular edema with complete resolution in 100% of cases, whereas in choroiditis there was no response in 100% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS, IS and anti-TNF-α drugs were effective to varying degrees for all inflammatory targets, whereas TCZ was ineffective for choroiditis and moderately effective for retinal vasculitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1719-1731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Corticosteroids, Immunosuppressants and Biotherapies in Patients with Birdshot Retinochoroidopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Essadiq, Laurence Bouillet, Christophe Chiquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273948.2025.2530139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the therapeutic response to corticosteroids (CS), conventional immunosuppressants (IS) and biotherapies in patients with birdshot retinochoroidopathy (BSCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>retrospective observational monocentric cohort study of 44 patients (87 eyes) with BSCR. We evaluated the therapeutic response between 4 and 12 months for venous vasculitis, capillary leakage, choroiditis and macular edema for the different therapeutic lines in each treated eye, a total of 225 evaluations. We defined responses as complete, partial, absent or quiescent according to a global inflammation score and according to the different inflammatory targets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Corticosteroids showed significant efficacy in choroiditis and vasculitis with 70% and 63% complete responses in these two criteria respectively, whereas their efficacy in capillary leakage was less evident with 38% lack of response. Conventional IS achieved a complete response in 54% of cases of choroiditis and 48% of cases of vasculitis, while their efficacy was less evident in macular edema, with partial or no response in 60% of cases. Anti-TNFα are fully effective in 41% of cases of choroiditis and in 50% of cases of venous vasculitis. Their efficacy in macular edema was very modest, with 77% of trials showing partial or no response. Anti-IL-6 drug was particularly effective in macular edema with complete resolution in 100% of cases, whereas in choroiditis there was no response in 100% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS, IS and anti-TNF-α drugs were effective to varying degrees for all inflammatory targets, whereas TCZ was ineffective for choroiditis and moderately effective for retinal vasculitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1719-1731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2530139\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2530139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价鸟状视网膜脉络膜病(BSCR)患者对皮质类固醇(CS)、常规免疫抑制剂(IS)和生物疗法的治疗效果。方法:回顾性观察单中心队列研究44例(87眼)BSCR患者。我们评估了每只治疗眼的静脉血管炎、毛细血管渗漏、脉络膜炎和黄斑水肿在4至12个月内的治疗效果,共225次评估。根据整体炎症评分和不同的炎症靶点,我们将反应定义为完全、部分、缺失或静止。结果:糖皮质激素对脉络膜炎和血管炎的疗效显著,两项指标的完全缓解率分别为70%和63%,而对毛细血管渗漏的疗效不明显,缺乏缓解率为38%。传统IS在54%的脉络膜炎病例和48%的血管炎病例中获得完全缓解,而其对黄斑水肿的疗效不太明显,60%的病例部分或无缓解。抗tnf α在41%的脉络膜炎病例和50%的静脉血管炎病例中完全有效。它们对黄斑水肿的疗效非常温和,77%的试验显示部分或无反应。抗il -6药物对黄斑水肿特别有效,100%的病例完全消退,而对脉络膜炎没有100%的反应。结论:CS、IS和抗tnf -α药物对所有炎症靶点均有不同程度的疗效,而TCZ对脉络膜炎无效,对视网膜血管炎有中等疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Corticosteroids, Immunosuppressants and Biotherapies in Patients with Birdshot Retinochoroidopathy.

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic response to corticosteroids (CS), conventional immunosuppressants (IS) and biotherapies in patients with birdshot retinochoroidopathy (BSCR).

Methods: retrospective observational monocentric cohort study of 44 patients (87 eyes) with BSCR. We evaluated the therapeutic response between 4 and 12 months for venous vasculitis, capillary leakage, choroiditis and macular edema for the different therapeutic lines in each treated eye, a total of 225 evaluations. We defined responses as complete, partial, absent or quiescent according to a global inflammation score and according to the different inflammatory targets.

Results: Corticosteroids showed significant efficacy in choroiditis and vasculitis with 70% and 63% complete responses in these two criteria respectively, whereas their efficacy in capillary leakage was less evident with 38% lack of response. Conventional IS achieved a complete response in 54% of cases of choroiditis and 48% of cases of vasculitis, while their efficacy was less evident in macular edema, with partial or no response in 60% of cases. Anti-TNFα are fully effective in 41% of cases of choroiditis and in 50% of cases of venous vasculitis. Their efficacy in macular edema was very modest, with 77% of trials showing partial or no response. Anti-IL-6 drug was particularly effective in macular edema with complete resolution in 100% of cases, whereas in choroiditis there was no response in 100% of cases.

Conclusion: CS, IS and anti-TNF-α drugs were effective to varying degrees for all inflammatory targets, whereas TCZ was ineffective for choroiditis and moderately effective for retinal vasculitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信