市售BP180-NC16A酶联免疫吸附试验的皮肤病学临界值是否适用于口腔黏膜类天疱疮的诊断?初步研究的结果。

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Andrea Gabusi, Federica Filippi, Camilla Loi, Lucio Montebugnoli, Cosimo Misciali, Davide B Gissi, Federico Bardazzi
{"title":"市售BP180-NC16A酶联免疫吸附试验的皮肤病学临界值是否适用于口腔黏膜类天疱疮的诊断?初步研究的结果。","authors":"Andrea Gabusi, Federica Filippi, Camilla Loi, Lucio Montebugnoli, Cosimo Misciali, Davide B Gissi, Federico Bardazzi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05004-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for BP180-NC16A use different cutoff levels established for cutaneous bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, in oral mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP), circulating antibodies are reported to be less readily detectable than cutaneous BP and there is little evidence that these cut-off levels are suitable for OMMP. This study was performed to explore whether the available cutoff values of anti-BP180-NC16A ELISA used for cutaneous BP are equally effective when applied to OMMP or should benefit from an optimized cut-off value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-one patients with oral blistering diseases were divided into two groups based on the results of histological and direct immunofluorescence analyses: the OMMP group (N.=31) and the non-OMMP control group (N.=50). Antibodies against BP180-NC16A were evaluated using manufacturer's cutoff level (Euroimmun 20 U/mL). A preliminary cutoff specific for BP180 in OMMP was identified by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cutoff value of 20 U/mL showed low sensitivity (41.94%) but high specificity (94%). Using ROC curve analysis, a cutoff of 11 U/mL emerged as the optimal cutoff for BP180-OMMP (sensitivity: 70.97%; specificity: 88.7%). Using both cutoff values false-positives cases emerged (pemphigus vulgaris and oral lichen planus).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BP180-NC16A ELISA cutoff values designed for cutaneous BP may not be equally accurate when applied for the diagnosis of OMMP. The use of cut-off values specific for OMMP and a panel of several antigens specific for OMMP may improve the clinical utility of ELISAs; however, problems deriving from low specificity should be acknowledged.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are the dermatological cut-off values of commercially available ELISAs for BP180-NC16A appropriate when applied for diagnosis of oral mucous membrane pemphigoid?. Results of a preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Gabusi, Federica Filippi, Camilla Loi, Lucio Montebugnoli, Cosimo Misciali, Davide B Gissi, Federico Bardazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05004-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for BP180-NC16A use different cutoff levels established for cutaneous bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, in oral mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP), circulating antibodies are reported to be less readily detectable than cutaneous BP and there is little evidence that these cut-off levels are suitable for OMMP. This study was performed to explore whether the available cutoff values of anti-BP180-NC16A ELISA used for cutaneous BP are equally effective when applied to OMMP or should benefit from an optimized cut-off value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-one patients with oral blistering diseases were divided into two groups based on the results of histological and direct immunofluorescence analyses: the OMMP group (N.=31) and the non-OMMP control group (N.=50). Antibodies against BP180-NC16A were evaluated using manufacturer's cutoff level (Euroimmun 20 U/mL). A preliminary cutoff specific for BP180 in OMMP was identified by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cutoff value of 20 U/mL showed low sensitivity (41.94%) but high specificity (94%). Using ROC curve analysis, a cutoff of 11 U/mL emerged as the optimal cutoff for BP180-OMMP (sensitivity: 70.97%; specificity: 88.7%). Using both cutoff values false-positives cases emerged (pemphigus vulgaris and oral lichen planus).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BP180-NC16A ELISA cutoff values designed for cutaneous BP may not be equally accurate when applied for the diagnosis of OMMP. The use of cut-off values specific for OMMP and a panel of several antigens specific for OMMP may improve the clinical utility of ELISAs; however, problems deriving from low specificity should be acknowledged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05004-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.25.05004-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:BP180-NC16A酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)试剂盒使用不同的截止水平建立皮肤大疱性类天疱疮(BP)。然而,据报道,在口腔粘膜类天疱疮(OMMP)中,循环抗体比皮肤BP更不易检测到,并且几乎没有证据表明这些截止水平适用于OMMP。本研究旨在探讨抗bp180 - nc16a酶联免疫法用于皮肤血压的可用截止值是否在用于OMMP时同样有效,或者是否应该从优化的截止值中获益。方法:81例口腔起疱性疾病患者根据组织学和直接免疫荧光分析结果分为两组:OMMP组(31例)和非OMMP组(50例)。BP180-NC16A抗体采用制造商截止水平(euroimmune 20 U/mL)进行检测。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定了OMMP中BP180特异性的初步临界值。结果:截断值为20 U/mL敏感性低(41.94%),特异度高(94%)。通过ROC曲线分析,BP180-OMMP的最佳检测截止值为11 U/mL(灵敏度为70.97%,特异性为88.7%)。使用这两个临界值出现假阳性病例(寻常性天疱疮和口腔扁平苔藓)。结论:设计用于皮肤血压的BP180-NC16A ELISA截止值在用于OMMP诊断时可能不同样准确。使用OMMP特异性的截止值和一组OMMP特异性抗原可以提高elisa的临床效用;然而,低特异性引起的问题也应得到承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are the dermatological cut-off values of commercially available ELISAs for BP180-NC16A appropriate when applied for diagnosis of oral mucous membrane pemphigoid?. Results of a preliminary study.

Background: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for BP180-NC16A use different cutoff levels established for cutaneous bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, in oral mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP), circulating antibodies are reported to be less readily detectable than cutaneous BP and there is little evidence that these cut-off levels are suitable for OMMP. This study was performed to explore whether the available cutoff values of anti-BP180-NC16A ELISA used for cutaneous BP are equally effective when applied to OMMP or should benefit from an optimized cut-off value.

Methods: Eighty-one patients with oral blistering diseases were divided into two groups based on the results of histological and direct immunofluorescence analyses: the OMMP group (N.=31) and the non-OMMP control group (N.=50). Antibodies against BP180-NC16A were evaluated using manufacturer's cutoff level (Euroimmun 20 U/mL). A preliminary cutoff specific for BP180 in OMMP was identified by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: A cutoff value of 20 U/mL showed low sensitivity (41.94%) but high specificity (94%). Using ROC curve analysis, a cutoff of 11 U/mL emerged as the optimal cutoff for BP180-OMMP (sensitivity: 70.97%; specificity: 88.7%). Using both cutoff values false-positives cases emerged (pemphigus vulgaris and oral lichen planus).

Conclusions: The BP180-NC16A ELISA cutoff values designed for cutaneous BP may not be equally accurate when applied for the diagnosis of OMMP. The use of cut-off values specific for OMMP and a panel of several antigens specific for OMMP may improve the clinical utility of ELISAs; however, problems deriving from low specificity should be acknowledged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信