开颅术后高血压患者接受拉贝他洛尔和尼卡地平治疗的疗效差异。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Matthew Owrey, George Sun, Marc Torjman, Kevin J Min
{"title":"开颅术后高血压患者接受拉贝他洛尔和尼卡地平治疗的疗效差异。","authors":"Matthew Owrey, George Sun, Marc Torjman, Kevin J Min","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative hypertension (APH) is encountered in patients following craniotomy and is associated with major complications. This retrospective cohort study evaluates 30-day survival for patients who received labetalol, nicardipine, or both drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 and older who underwent craniotomy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2023 were included in the study. Analyses were performed comparing (1) labetalol cohort versus nicardipine cohort, (2) labetalol cohort versus both cohort, and (3) nicardipine cohort versus both cohort. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), arrhythmia, and intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The labetalol cohort had improved 30-day survival compared with the nicardipine cohort (HR: 0.49, P<0.0001) or both (HR: 0.67, P<0.0001). The nicardipine cohort had worse survival compared with both cohorts (HR: 1.28, P<0.0001). The labetalol cohort had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with nicardipine (RR: 0.89, P=0.001) and both cohorts (RR: 0.90, P<0.001). The labetalol cohort had less congestive heart failure than the nicardipine cohort (RR: 0.66, P<0.0001), and the nicardipine cohort had more CHF than the cohort that received both drugs (RR: 1.21, P=0.018). There was no difference in STEMI, NSTEMI, or readmissions across cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Labetalol for APH after craniotomy is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine or combination. A combination of these drugs is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":"37 4","pages":"398-403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Outcomes for Patients Receiving Labetalol and Nicardipine for Hypertension After Craniotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Owrey, George Sun, Marc Torjman, Kevin J Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative hypertension (APH) is encountered in patients following craniotomy and is associated with major complications. This retrospective cohort study evaluates 30-day survival for patients who received labetalol, nicardipine, or both drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 and older who underwent craniotomy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2023 were included in the study. Analyses were performed comparing (1) labetalol cohort versus nicardipine cohort, (2) labetalol cohort versus both cohort, and (3) nicardipine cohort versus both cohort. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), arrhythmia, and intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The labetalol cohort had improved 30-day survival compared with the nicardipine cohort (HR: 0.49, P<0.0001) or both (HR: 0.67, P<0.0001). The nicardipine cohort had worse survival compared with both cohorts (HR: 1.28, P<0.0001). The labetalol cohort had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with nicardipine (RR: 0.89, P=0.001) and both cohorts (RR: 0.90, P<0.001). The labetalol cohort had less congestive heart failure than the nicardipine cohort (RR: 0.66, P<0.0001), and the nicardipine cohort had more CHF than the cohort that received both drugs (RR: 1.21, P=0.018). There was no difference in STEMI, NSTEMI, or readmissions across cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Labetalol for APH after craniotomy is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine or combination. A combination of these drugs is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"398-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性术后高血压(APH)是开颅术后患者常见的并发症。这项回顾性队列研究评估了接受拉贝他洛尔、尼卡地平或两种药物治疗的患者的30天生存率。方法:选取2010年1月1日至2023年1月1日期间接受开颅手术的18岁及以上患者。分析比较(1)拉贝他洛尔队列与尼卡地平队列,(2)拉贝他洛尔队列与两个队列,(3)尼卡地平队列与两个队列。主要终点为30天生存率。次要结局包括30天再入院、st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)、心律失常和颅内出血。结果:与尼卡地平组相比,拉贝他洛尔组的30天生存率提高(HR: 0.49, p)。结论:与尼卡地平或联合使用拉贝他洛尔组相比,拉贝他洛尔治疗开颅术后APH可提高生存率。与单独使用尼卡地平相比,联合使用这些药物可提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Outcomes for Patients Receiving Labetalol and Nicardipine for Hypertension After Craniotomy.

Background: Acute postoperative hypertension (APH) is encountered in patients following craniotomy and is associated with major complications. This retrospective cohort study evaluates 30-day survival for patients who received labetalol, nicardipine, or both drugs.

Methods: Patients 18 and older who underwent craniotomy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2023 were included in the study. Analyses were performed comparing (1) labetalol cohort versus nicardipine cohort, (2) labetalol cohort versus both cohort, and (3) nicardipine cohort versus both cohort. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), arrhythmia, and intracranial hemorrhage.

Results: The labetalol cohort had improved 30-day survival compared with the nicardipine cohort (HR: 0.49, P<0.0001) or both (HR: 0.67, P<0.0001). The nicardipine cohort had worse survival compared with both cohorts (HR: 1.28, P<0.0001). The labetalol cohort had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with nicardipine (RR: 0.89, P=0.001) and both cohorts (RR: 0.90, P<0.001). The labetalol cohort had less congestive heart failure than the nicardipine cohort (RR: 0.66, P<0.0001), and the nicardipine cohort had more CHF than the cohort that received both drugs (RR: 1.21, P=0.018). There was no difference in STEMI, NSTEMI, or readmissions across cohorts.

Conclusions: Labetalol for APH after craniotomy is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine or combination. A combination of these drugs is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信