Matthew Owrey, George Sun, Marc Torjman, Kevin J Min
{"title":"开颅术后高血压患者接受拉贝他洛尔和尼卡地平治疗的疗效差异。","authors":"Matthew Owrey, George Sun, Marc Torjman, Kevin J Min","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative hypertension (APH) is encountered in patients following craniotomy and is associated with major complications. This retrospective cohort study evaluates 30-day survival for patients who received labetalol, nicardipine, or both drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 and older who underwent craniotomy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2023 were included in the study. Analyses were performed comparing (1) labetalol cohort versus nicardipine cohort, (2) labetalol cohort versus both cohort, and (3) nicardipine cohort versus both cohort. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), arrhythmia, and intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The labetalol cohort had improved 30-day survival compared with the nicardipine cohort (HR: 0.49, P<0.0001) or both (HR: 0.67, P<0.0001). The nicardipine cohort had worse survival compared with both cohorts (HR: 1.28, P<0.0001). The labetalol cohort had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with nicardipine (RR: 0.89, P=0.001) and both cohorts (RR: 0.90, P<0.001). The labetalol cohort had less congestive heart failure than the nicardipine cohort (RR: 0.66, P<0.0001), and the nicardipine cohort had more CHF than the cohort that received both drugs (RR: 1.21, P=0.018). There was no difference in STEMI, NSTEMI, or readmissions across cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Labetalol for APH after craniotomy is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine or combination. A combination of these drugs is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":"37 4","pages":"398-403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Outcomes for Patients Receiving Labetalol and Nicardipine for Hypertension After Craniotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Owrey, George Sun, Marc Torjman, Kevin J Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative hypertension (APH) is encountered in patients following craniotomy and is associated with major complications. This retrospective cohort study evaluates 30-day survival for patients who received labetalol, nicardipine, or both drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 18 and older who underwent craniotomy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2023 were included in the study. Analyses were performed comparing (1) labetalol cohort versus nicardipine cohort, (2) labetalol cohort versus both cohort, and (3) nicardipine cohort versus both cohort. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), arrhythmia, and intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The labetalol cohort had improved 30-day survival compared with the nicardipine cohort (HR: 0.49, P<0.0001) or both (HR: 0.67, P<0.0001). The nicardipine cohort had worse survival compared with both cohorts (HR: 1.28, P<0.0001). The labetalol cohort had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with nicardipine (RR: 0.89, P=0.001) and both cohorts (RR: 0.90, P<0.001). The labetalol cohort had less congestive heart failure than the nicardipine cohort (RR: 0.66, P<0.0001), and the nicardipine cohort had more CHF than the cohort that received both drugs (RR: 1.21, P=0.018). There was no difference in STEMI, NSTEMI, or readmissions across cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Labetalol for APH after craniotomy is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine or combination. A combination of these drugs is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"398-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in Outcomes for Patients Receiving Labetalol and Nicardipine for Hypertension After Craniotomy.
Background: Acute postoperative hypertension (APH) is encountered in patients following craniotomy and is associated with major complications. This retrospective cohort study evaluates 30-day survival for patients who received labetalol, nicardipine, or both drugs.
Methods: Patients 18 and older who underwent craniotomy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2023 were included in the study. Analyses were performed comparing (1) labetalol cohort versus nicardipine cohort, (2) labetalol cohort versus both cohort, and (3) nicardipine cohort versus both cohort. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), arrhythmia, and intracranial hemorrhage.
Results: The labetalol cohort had improved 30-day survival compared with the nicardipine cohort (HR: 0.49, P<0.0001) or both (HR: 0.67, P<0.0001). The nicardipine cohort had worse survival compared with both cohorts (HR: 1.28, P<0.0001). The labetalol cohort had a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with nicardipine (RR: 0.89, P=0.001) and both cohorts (RR: 0.90, P<0.001). The labetalol cohort had less congestive heart failure than the nicardipine cohort (RR: 0.66, P<0.0001), and the nicardipine cohort had more CHF than the cohort that received both drugs (RR: 1.21, P=0.018). There was no difference in STEMI, NSTEMI, or readmissions across cohorts.
Conclusions: Labetalol for APH after craniotomy is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine or combination. A combination of these drugs is associated with improved survival compared with nicardipine alone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies.
JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.