Sebastian Marx, Joaquín Fernández, Mario Gerlach, Steve Schallhorn, Wolfgang Sickenberger
{"title":"衍射多焦人工晶状体虚拟植入对光现象感知的评价。","authors":"Sebastian Marx, Joaquín Fernández, Mario Gerlach, Steve Schallhorn, Wolfgang Sickenberger","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250707-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the difference in objective and subjective photic phenomena following virtual implantation of three different presbyopia-correcting diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at JENVIS Research Germany. A prospective cross-over and double-masked trial design was used. Seventy-four healthy individuals without cataract (age: 18 to 50 years) were enrolled. All participants assessed photic phenomena with three diffractive IOL designs by virtual implantation using the VirtIOL device (10Lens S.L.U), which allows participants to view through the IOL imaged at the iris plane as if it were implanted: IOL A (Tecnis Synergy ZFR00V; J&J Vision), IOL B (AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00; Alcon Laboratories, Inc), and IOL C (AT ELANA 841P; Carl Zeiss Meditec). The size of the starburst and annular light pattern was measured in degrees, and participants were asked about their preference in terms of quality of night vision when comparing by pairs the IOLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The starburst pattern size was significantly larger with IOL A (5.54 ± 0.62º) compared to the IOLs B (3.82 ± 0.90º, <i>P</i> < .001) and C (3.65 ± 0.57º, <i>P</i> < .001). However, there were no significant differences between IOLs B and C (<i>P</i> = .078). Regarding the induced annular light pattern, no significant differences were found between IOLs (<i>P</i> > .05). In a pairwise short-term comparison of the IOLs using a simulated night scene with a glare source, participant preference was in favor of IOL C (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IOL A had objectively a significantly larger starburst pattern than the other two. In a short-term comparison, the new trifocal IOL C was significantly preferred in a night driving scene.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"e968-e974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Perception of Photic Phenomena Through Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Designs by Its Virtual Implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Marx, Joaquín Fernández, Mario Gerlach, Steve Schallhorn, Wolfgang Sickenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250707-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the difference in objective and subjective photic phenomena following virtual implantation of three different presbyopia-correcting diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at JENVIS Research Germany. A prospective cross-over and double-masked trial design was used. Seventy-four healthy individuals without cataract (age: 18 to 50 years) were enrolled. All participants assessed photic phenomena with three diffractive IOL designs by virtual implantation using the VirtIOL device (10Lens S.L.U), which allows participants to view through the IOL imaged at the iris plane as if it were implanted: IOL A (Tecnis Synergy ZFR00V; J&J Vision), IOL B (AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00; Alcon Laboratories, Inc), and IOL C (AT ELANA 841P; Carl Zeiss Meditec). The size of the starburst and annular light pattern was measured in degrees, and participants were asked about their preference in terms of quality of night vision when comparing by pairs the IOLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The starburst pattern size was significantly larger with IOL A (5.54 ± 0.62º) compared to the IOLs B (3.82 ± 0.90º, <i>P</i> < .001) and C (3.65 ± 0.57º, <i>P</i> < .001). However, there were no significant differences between IOLs B and C (<i>P</i> = .078). Regarding the induced annular light pattern, no significant differences were found between IOLs (<i>P</i> > .05). In a pairwise short-term comparison of the IOLs using a simulated night scene with a glare source, participant preference was in favor of IOL C (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IOL A had objectively a significantly larger starburst pattern than the other two. In a short-term comparison, the new trifocal IOL C was significantly preferred in a night driving scene.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"e968-e974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250707-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250707-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:分析三种不同衍射型老花眼人工晶状体(IOL)虚拟植入术后主客观光现象的差异。方法:研究在德国JENVIS研究所进行。采用前瞻性交叉和双盲试验设计。74名无白内障的健康个体(年龄:18 - 50岁)被纳入研究。所有参与者通过使用VirtIOL设备(10Lens S.L.U)虚拟植入三种衍射IOL设计来评估光现象,该设备允许参与者通过虹膜平面成像的IOL进行观察,就像它被植入一样:IOL A (Tecnis Synergy ZFR00V; J&J Vision), IOL B (AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00;爱尔康实验室公司)和IOL C (at ELANA 841P;卡尔蔡司Meditec)。星爆和环形光模式的大小以程度来衡量,并且参与者被问及他们在对iol进行比较时对夜视质量的偏好。结果:人工晶状体A(5.54±0.62º)比人工晶状体B(3.82±0.90º,P < 0.001)和人工晶状体C(3.65±0.57º,P < 0.001)明显增大。然而,人工晶状体B和C之间无显著差异(P = 0.078)。两组人工晶状体的诱导环形光形态差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在使用具有眩光源的模拟夜景对IOL进行的配对短期比较中,参与者偏好IOL C (P < 0.001)。结论:人工晶状体A的星爆型明显大于其他两种。在短期比较中,新的三焦人工晶状体在夜间驾驶场景中明显更好。
Evaluation of Perception of Photic Phenomena Through Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Designs by Its Virtual Implantation.
Purpose: To analyze the difference in objective and subjective photic phenomena following virtual implantation of three different presbyopia-correcting diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) designs.
Methods: The study was conducted at JENVIS Research Germany. A prospective cross-over and double-masked trial design was used. Seventy-four healthy individuals without cataract (age: 18 to 50 years) were enrolled. All participants assessed photic phenomena with three diffractive IOL designs by virtual implantation using the VirtIOL device (10Lens S.L.U), which allows participants to view through the IOL imaged at the iris plane as if it were implanted: IOL A (Tecnis Synergy ZFR00V; J&J Vision), IOL B (AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00; Alcon Laboratories, Inc), and IOL C (AT ELANA 841P; Carl Zeiss Meditec). The size of the starburst and annular light pattern was measured in degrees, and participants were asked about their preference in terms of quality of night vision when comparing by pairs the IOLs.
Results: The starburst pattern size was significantly larger with IOL A (5.54 ± 0.62º) compared to the IOLs B (3.82 ± 0.90º, P < .001) and C (3.65 ± 0.57º, P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between IOLs B and C (P = .078). Regarding the induced annular light pattern, no significant differences were found between IOLs (P > .05). In a pairwise short-term comparison of the IOLs using a simulated night scene with a glare source, participant preference was in favor of IOL C (P < .001).
Conclusions: IOL A had objectively a significantly larger starburst pattern than the other two. In a short-term comparison, the new trifocal IOL C was significantly preferred in a night driving scene.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.